Seismic assessment of a heavy-timber frame structure with ring-doweled moment-resisting connections

The performance of heavy-timber structures in earthquakes depends strongly on the inelastic behavior of the mechanical connections. Nevertheless, the nonlinear behavior of timber structures is only considered in the design phase indirectly through the use of an R-factor or a q-factor, which reduces the seismic elastic response spectrum. To improve the estimation of this, the seismic performance of a three-story building designed with ring-doweled moment resisting connections is analyzed here. Connections and members were designed to fulfill the seismic detailing requirements present in Eurocode 5 and Eurocode 8 for high ductility class structures. The performance of the structure is evaluated through a probabilistic approach, which accounts for uncertainties in mechanical properties of members and connections. Nonlinear static analyses and multi-record incremental dynamic analyses were performed to characterize the q-factor and develop fragility curves for different damage levels. The results indicate that the detailing requirements of Eurocode 5 and Eurocode 8 are sufficient to achieve the required performance, even though they also indicate that these requirements may be optimized to achieve more cost-effective connections and members. From the obtained fragility curves, it was verified that neglecting modeling uncertainties may lead to overestimation of the collapse capacity.

[1]  Yantao Li,et al.  Modeling Timber Moment Connection under Reversed Cyclic Loading , 2005 .

[2]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures , 1999 .

[3]  Brent B Welch,et al.  Practical Programming in Tcl and Tk , 1999 .

[4]  L. Lowes,et al.  A Beam-Column Joint Model for Simulating the Earthquake Response of Reinforced Concrete Frames , 2004 .

[5]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .

[6]  Roberto Tomasi,et al.  Ductile moment-resistant steel–timber connections , 2011 .

[7]  Dirk P. Kroese,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[8]  Michael Havbro Faber,et al.  Probabilistic modeling of timber structures , 2005 .

[9]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Reliability of woodframe residential construction subjected to earthquakes , 2007 .

[10]  Ario Ceccotti,et al.  Cyclic behaviour of typical metal connectors for cross-laminated (CLT) structures , 2015 .

[11]  Abdy Kermani,et al.  Structural Timber Design to Eurocode 5 , 2008 .

[12]  Claudio Amadio,et al.  A component approach for the hysteretic behaviour of connections in cross‐laminated wooden structures , 2013 .

[13]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings , 2009 .

[14]  B. Folz,et al.  Cyclic Analysis of Wood Shear Walls , 2001 .

[15]  Robert E. Bachman,et al.  Creating Fragility Functions for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2007 .

[16]  Chanakya Arya,et al.  Design in timber to BS 5268 , 2009 .

[17]  A. Jorissen,et al.  General notes on ductility in timber structures , 2011 .

[18]  John W. van de Lindt,et al.  Evolution of Predicted Seismic Performance for Wood-Frame Buildings , 2016 .

[19]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Consistent inelastic design spectra: Strength and displacement , 1994 .

[20]  A. J. Carr,et al.  The seismic behaviour of plywood sheathed shearwalls , 1986 .

[21]  John W. van de Lindt,et al.  Performance-Based Wind Engineering for Wood-Frame Buildings , 2009 .

[22]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra , 1999 .

[23]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design , 1994 .

[24]  Yue-Jun Yin,et al.  Seismic collapse risk of light-frame wood construction considering aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties , 2010 .

[25]  Andrea Lucchini,et al.  Intensity measures for the seismic response prediction of mid-rise buildings with hysteretic dampers , 2015 .

[26]  K. W. Johansen,et al.  Theory of Timber Connections , 1949 .

[27]  A. Vignoli,et al.  Timber structures in seismic regions RILEM state-of-the-art report , 1994 .

[28]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Probabilistic seismic response analysis of a 3-D reinforced concrete building , 2013 .

[29]  J. Baker,et al.  Correlation of Spectral Acceleration Values from NGA Ground Motion Models , 2008 .

[30]  Mohammad Noori,et al.  Equivalent linearization of generally pinching hysteretic, degrading systems , 1996 .

[31]  Nathan M. Newmark,et al.  A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics , 1959 .

[32]  Michael Fairhurst,et al.  Seismic reliability analysis of a timber steel hybrid system , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[33]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[34]  Andre R. Barbosa Simplified vector-valued probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and probabilistic seismic demand analysis : application to the 13-story NEHRP reinforced concrete frame-wall building design example , 2011 .

[35]  J. Carson Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method , 1982 .

[36]  Charles C. Thiel,et al.  Earthquake Spectra , 1984 .

[37]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Seismic analysis of woodframe structures. II: Model implementation and verification , 2004 .

[38]  Giorgio Monti,et al.  Intensity measures for the seismic response prediction of base-isolated buildings , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[39]  Greg Foliente,et al.  Hysteresis Modeling of Wood Joints and Structural Systems , 1995 .

[40]  Ario Ceccotti,et al.  A proposal for a standard procedure to establish the seismic behaviour factor q of timber buildings , 2010 .

[41]  Luís C. Neves,et al.  Application of Reliability-Based Robustness Assessment of Steel Moment Resisting Frame Structures under Post-Mainshock Cascading Events , 2014 .

[42]  P. Racher,et al.  Analysis of dowelled timber to timber moment-resisting joints , 2007 .

[43]  Luis Ibarra,et al.  Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration , 2005 .

[44]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Performance-Based Engineering of Wood Frame Housing: Fragility Analysis Methodology , 2002 .

[45]  Kyung Ho Lee,et al.  Fragility analysis of woodframe buildings considering combined snow and earthquake loading , 2006 .

[46]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[47]  Rafik Y. Itani,et al.  Finite Element Modeling of Wood Diaphragms , 1989 .

[48]  Naohito Kawai,et al.  SOFIE project – 3D shaking table test on a seven‐storey full‐scale cross‐laminated timber building , 2013 .

[49]  Michael H. Scott,et al.  Nonlinear Finite-Element Analysis Software Architecture Using Object Composition , 2010, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[50]  Michael Havbro Faber,et al.  Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering , 2011 .

[51]  Andrea Polastri Caratterizzazione del comportamento di giunti semirigidi per strutture lignee in zona sismica , 2010 .

[52]  Luca Pozza Ductility and behaviour factor of wood structural systems - Theoretical and experimental development of a high ductility wood-concrete shearwall system , 2013 .

[53]  Patrick Paultre,et al.  Ductility and overstrength in seismic design of reinforced concrete structures , 1994 .

[54]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[55]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis , 2015 .