Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Vikash K. Mansinghka | Vikash K Mansinghka | Adam N Sanborn | Thomas L Griffiths | Adam N. Sanborn | T. Griffiths
[1] A. Rose,et al. The Relative Sensitivities of Television Pickup Tubes, Photographic Film, and the Human Eye , 1942, Proceedings of the IRE.
[2] H. Vries. The quantum character of light and its bearing upon threshold of vision, the differential sensitivity and visual acuity of the eye , 1943 .
[3] F. Heider,et al. An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .
[4] W. E. Hick. The Threshold for Sudden Changes in the Velocity of a Seen Object , 1950, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[5] J. Knott. The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory , 1951 .
[6] W. W. Peterson,et al. The theory of signal detectability , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.
[7] J. M. Notterman,et al. Weber's Law and the Difference Threshold for the Velocity of a Seen Object , 1957, Science.
[8] A. Gemelli,et al. The influence of the subject's attitude in perception , 1958 .
[9] H. Laborit,et al. [Experimental study]. , 1958, Bulletin mensuel - Societe de medecine militaire francaise.
[10] G. Ekman. Weber's Law and Related Functions , 1959 .
[11] T. Natsoulas. Judgments of velocity and weight in a casual situation. , 1960, The American journal of psychology.
[12] W. Goldsmith,et al. Impact: the theory and physical behaviour of colliding solids. , 1960 .
[13] D. Boyle. A Contribution to the Study of Phenomenal Causation* , 1960 .
[14] T. Natsoulas. Principles of momentum and kinetic energy in the perception of causality. , 1961, The American journal of psychology.
[15] R. C. Oldfield. THE PERCEPTION OF CAUSALITY , 1963 .
[16] H. M. Jenkins,et al. JUDGMENT OF CONTINGENCY BETWEEN RESPONSES AND OUTCOMES. , 1965, Psychological monographs.
[17] D. M. Green,et al. Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .
[18] R. Rescorla. Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[19] N. Beasley. The extent of individual differences in the perception of causality. , 1968, Canadian journal of psychology.
[20] Beasley Na. The extent of individual differences in the perception of causality. , 1968 .
[21] H. Akaike,et al. Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .
[22] B. Shanon. Aristotelianism, Newtonianism and the Physics of the Layman , 1976, Perception.
[23] D. P. Andrews,et al. Acuity for spatial separation as a function of stimulus size , 1978, Vision Research.
[24] Hirotugu Akaike,et al. On the Likelihood of a Time Series Model , 1978 .
[25] S. Weir. The Perception of Motion: Michotte Revisited , 1978 .
[26] A. Caramazza,et al. Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.
[27] Andrea A. diSessa,et al. Unlearning Aristotelian Physics: A Study of Knowledge-Based Learning , 1982, Cogn. Sci..
[28] J T Todd,et al. Visual Perception of Relative Mass in Dynamic Events , 1982, Perception.
[29] S. Runeson. On visual perception of dynamic events , 1983 .
[30] H. Barlow. Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .
[31] M. McCloskey,et al. Intuitive physics: the straight-down belief and its origin. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[32] R. Shepard. Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.
[33] G. Miller,et al. The Cognitive Sciences , 1984 .
[34] A. Leslie. Spatiotemporal Continuity and the Perception of Causality in Infants , 1984, Perception.
[35] R. Shepard. Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.
[36] D. Proffitt,et al. Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[37] E. Spelke,et al. Object perception and object-directed reaching in infancy. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[38] R. Nosofsky. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[39] J. Jonides,et al. Intuitive reasoning about abstract and familiar physics problems , 1986, Memory & cognition.
[40] R. Shepard,et al. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.
[41] A. Leslie,et al. Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? , 1987, Cognition.
[42] W H Warren,et al. The Way the Ball Bounces: Visual and Auditory Perception of Elasticity and Control of the Bounce Pass , 1987, Perception.
[43] Johanna D. Moore,et al. The Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1988 .
[44] Leonard Talmy,et al. Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition , 1987, Cogn. Sci..
[45] Paul Thagard,et al. Explanatory Coherence and Belief Revision in Naive Physics , 1988 .
[46] P. White. Causal Processing: Origins and Development , 1988 .
[47] D. Proffitt,et al. Understanding natural dynamics. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[48] W. Geisler. Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations. , 1989, Psychological review.
[49] D R Proffitt,et al. Understanding collision dynamics. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[50] John R. Anderson. The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .
[51] John R. Anderson,et al. The Adaptive Nature of Human Categorization , 1991 .
[52] D. Gilden. On the origins of dynamical awareness. , 1991, Psychological review.
[53] H. Hecht,et al. Influence of animation on dynamical judgments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[54] D. Shanks,et al. Evidence for a Distinction between Judged and Perceived Causality , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[55] S. Runeson,et al. The indispensability of precollision kinematics in the visual perception of relative mass , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.
[56] L. Cohen,et al. How infants perceive a simple causal event , 1993 .
[57] N. Anderson,et al. An information integration approach to phenomenal causality , 1993, Memory & cognition.
[58] S. Lea,et al. Visual Perception of Intentional Motion , 1994, Perception.
[59] D. Proffitt,et al. Heuristic judgment of mass ratio in two-body collisions , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[60] S. Flynn. The Perception of Relative Mass in Physical Collisions , 1994 .
[61] S. Runeson. Support for the cue-heuristic model is based on suboptimal observer performance: Response to Gilden and Proffitt (1994) , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.
[62] R. Sekuler,et al. Sound alters visual motion perception , 1997, Nature.
[63] P. Cheng. From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. , 1997 .
[64] P. White,et al. Phenomenal causality: impressions of pulling in the visual perception of objects in motion. , 1997, The American journal of psychology.
[65] L. Cohen,et al. Precursors to infants' perception of the causality of a simple event , 1998 .
[66] Nir Vulkan. An Economist's Perspective on Probability Matching , 2000 .
[67] P. Juslin,et al. Visual perception of dynamic properties: cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence. , 2000, Psychological review.
[68] Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al. Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[69] Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al. Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.
[70] D. M. Jacobs,et al. Learning to perceive the relative mass of colliding balls: The effects of ratio scaling and feedback , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[71] S. Shimojo,et al. When Sound Affects Vision: Effects of Auditory Grouping on Visual Motion Perception , 2001, Psychological science.
[72] M. Hegarty,et al. Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[73] Steve Rothberg,et al. Measurement of contact time in short duration sports ball impacts: an experimental method and correlation with the perceptions of elite golfers , 2001 .
[74] Jeffrey S. Perry,et al. Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.
[75] F. Lacquaniti,et al. Does the brain model Newton's laws? , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.
[76] D. M. Jacobs,et al. Learning to visually perceive the relative mass of colliding balls in globally and locally constrained task ecologies. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[77] Refractor. Vision , 2000, The Lancet.
[78] Cara H. Cashon,et al. A constructivist model of infant cognition , 2002 .
[79] T. Hubbard,et al. A possible role of naïve impetus in Michotte's "launching effect": Evidence from representational momentum , 2002 .
[80] Edward H. Adelson,et al. Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[81] K. Nakayama,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article CAUSAL CAPTURE: Contextual Effects on the Perception of Collision Events , 2022 .
[82] David R. Anderson,et al. Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .
[83] N. Troje,et al. Audiovisual phenomenal causality , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.
[84] M. Peruggia. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (2nd ed.) , 2003 .
[85] Koen Lamberts,et al. An Exemplar Model For Perceptual Categorization Of Events , 2003 .
[86] E. Wagenmakers,et al. AIC model selection using Akaike weights , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[87] A. Yuille,et al. Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.
[88] B. Scholl,et al. Effects of grouping and attention on the perception of causality , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.
[89] K. Nakayama,et al. Illusory Causal Crescents: Misperceived Spatial Relations Due to Perceived Causality , 2004, Perception.
[90] Wilson S. Geisler,et al. Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search , 2005, Nature.
[91] Alan A. Stocker,et al. Sensory Adaptation within a Bayesian Framework for Perception , 2005, NIPS.
[92] S. Carey,et al. The perception of causality in infancy. , 2006, Acta psychologica.
[93] Clara Casco,et al. The psychophysical law of speed estimation in Michotte’s causal events , 2006, Vision Research.
[94] Eero P. Simoncelli,et al. Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.
[95] A. Cohen. Contributions of invariants, heuristics, and exemplars to the visual perception of relative mass. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[96] A. Yuille,et al. Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis? , 2022 .
[97] P. White. The causal asymmetry. , 2006, Psychological review.
[98] M. V. Velzen,et al. Self-organizing maps , 2007 .
[99] M. Kenward,et al. An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .
[100] G. V. van Orden,et al. The emergent coordination of cognitive function. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[101] F. Lacquaniti,et al. Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.
[102] S. Runeson,et al. Realism of Confidence, Modes of Apprehension, and Variable-Use in Visual Discrimination of Relative Mass , 2008 .
[103] Kenneth D. Forbus,et al. Learning Naïve Physics Models and Misconceptions , 2009 .
[104] P. Dayan,et al. Perceptual organization in the tilt illusion. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[105] Vikash K. Mansinghka,et al. A Bayesian framework for modeling intuitive dynamics , 2009 .
[106] P. White. Perception of forces exerted by objects in collision events. , 2009, Psychological review.
[107] A. Cohen,et al. Exploring mass perception with Markov chain Monte Carlo. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[108] Joshua B Tenenbaum,et al. Theory-based causal induction. , 2009, Psychological review.
[109] Kenneth D. Forbus,et al. Learning Naïve Physics Models by Analogical Generalization , 2009 .
[110] Adam N Sanborn,et al. Exemplar models as a mechanism for performing Bayesian inference , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[111] William H Warren,et al. Passive vs. active control of rhythmic ball bouncing: the role of visual information. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[112] A. Chatterjee,et al. Space and Time in Perceptual Causality , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[113] Adam N Sanborn,et al. Rational approximations to rational models: alternative algorithms for category learning. , 2010, Psychological review.
[114] J. Bennett,et al. Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding , 2010 .
[115] Jessica B. Hamrick. Internal physics models guide probabilistic judgments about object dynamics , 2011 .
[116] E. Brenner,et al. Misjudging where you felt a light switch in a dark room , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.
[117] Jonathan I. Flombaum,et al. Amodal Causal Capture in the Tunnel Effect , 2011, Perception.
[118] J. Degrieck,et al. Finite element modelling and experimental study of oblique soccer ball bounce , 2011, Journal of sports sciences.
[119] L. Rips. Causation From Perception , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[120] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. Noisy Newtons: Unifying process and dependency accounts of causal attribution , 2012, CogSci.
[121] Kevin A. Smith,et al. Sources of uncertainty in intuitive physics , 2012, CogSci.