Efficient analysis of variability impact on interconnect lines and resistor networks

Continued technology scaling coupled with limited lithographic capabilities is a leading cause of increased design variability. In the nanometer regime lithography tools have failed to keep pace with Moore's Law and printed feature sizes are a small fraction of the wavelength of light used in current processes. Such sub-wavelength printing makes features highly susceptible to perturbations in the lithographic process conditions which leads to printed designs exhibiting increased variability. Such variability directly affects design behavior and performance in multiple ways. One of the areas of concern is power grid (PG) design, where lithographic errors may locally modify the wire widths. These variations, that may affect any and all wires in the grid, have a critical impact on the power distribution across the chip, introducing considerable current fluctuations which are a potential cause for electromigration effects. To analyze and account for the impact of these errors requires a complete extraction of the PG, which generates a large resistive network, potentially with several million elements, whose simulation is computationally challenging. This paper proposes a fast and accurate variability analysis of very large resistor networks, such as PG extracted netlists, that allows estimating the effects of multiple parameter settings in reasonable time. The proposed model can be easily combined with Litho/CMP simulators in order to boost much needed design-aware lithography.

[1]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[2]  Yici Cai,et al.  Fast Variational Analysis of On-Chip Power Grids by Stochastic Extended Krylov Subspace Method , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[3]  Jorge Fernandez Villena,et al.  SPARE - A Scalable Algorithm for Passive, Structure Preserving, Parameter-Aware Model Order Reduction , 2010, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[4]  Rajendran Panda,et al.  Stochastic variational analysis of large power grids considering intra-die correlations , 2006, 2006 43rd ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference.

[5]  Sani R. Nassif,et al.  Power grid analysis using random walks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[6]  Luís Miguel Silveira,et al.  Efficient Simulation of Power Grids , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[7]  Joost Rommes,et al.  Efficient Methods for Large Resistor Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[8]  J. Phillips,et al.  Poor man's TBR: a simple model reduction scheme , 2005 .

[9]  Sani R. Nassif,et al.  Fast power grid simulation , 2000, Proceedings 37th Design Automation Conference.

[10]  Peng Li,et al.  Statistical Sampling-Based Parametric Analysis of Power Grids , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[11]  Pei Sun,et al.  Efficient incremental analysis of on-chip power grid via sparse approximation , 2011, 2011 48th ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC).

[12]  Sani R. Nassif,et al.  Multigrid-like technique for power grid analysis , 2001, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design. ICCAD 2001. IEEE/ACM Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.01CH37281).

[13]  Martin D. F. Wong,et al.  Fast algorithms for IR drop analysis in large power grid , 2005, ICCAD-2005. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, 2005..

[14]  Rajendran Panda,et al.  Stochastic power grid analysis considering process variations , 2005, Design, Automation and Test in Europe.

[15]  Sani R. Nassif,et al.  Power grid analysis benchmarks , 2008, 2008 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference.

[16]  Sachin S. Sapatnekar,et al.  Incremental solution of power grids using random walks , 2010, 2010 15th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC).

[17]  Farid N. Najm,et al.  Analysis and verification of power grids considering process-induced leakage-current variations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[18]  Sani R. Nassif,et al.  Design-aware lithography , 2012, ISPD '12.

[19]  Joel R. Phillips,et al.  Poor man's TBR: a simple model reduction scheme , 2004 .

[20]  Roxana Ionutiu,et al.  SparseRC: Sparsity Preserving Model Reduction for RC Circuits With Many Terminals , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.