Association-based Concealed Information Test: A Novel Reaction Time-Based Deception Detection Method

Submitted manuscript version. Published version available in Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (2017) 6, 283-294.

[1]  Giuseppe Sartori,et al.  The autobiographical IAT: a review , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[2]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  How to Accurately Detect Autobiographical Events , 2008, Psychological science.

[3]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Cheating the Lie Detector , 2009, Psychological science.

[4]  Y. Schul,et al.  If I imagine it, then it happened: The Implicit Truth Value of imaginary representations , 2014, Cognition.

[5]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[6]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  R. Ratcliff.  Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  C M Seifert,et al.  Using response time measures to assess "guilty knowledge". , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Leakage of information to innocent suspects , 2011 .

[12]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  What's on Your Mind? Recent Advances in Memory Detection Using the Concealed Information Test , 2014 .

[13]  J. A. Podlesny.  A paucity of operable case facts restricts applicability of the guilty knowledge technique in FBI criminal polygraph examinations , 2003 .

[14]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  ID‐Check: Online Concealed Information Test Reveals True Identity , 2016, Journal of forensic sciences.

[15]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Mihai Varga,et al.  When Interference Helps: Increasing Executive Load to Facilitate Deception Detection in the Concealed Information Test , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[17]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[18]  Jin-Sup Eom,et al.  Effects of Varying Numbers of Probes on RT-based CIT Accuracy , 2016, MUE 2016.

[19]  A. Schütz,et al.  What do fakers actually do to fake the IAT? An investigation of faking strategies under different faking conditions , 2013 .

[20]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Humans as Lie Detectors , 1980 .

[21]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  The role of motivation to avoid detection in reaction time-based concealed information detection. , 2016, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.

[22]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Detecting deception through reaction times , 2015 .

[23]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  RT-BASED MEMORY DETECTION: ITEM SALIENCY EFFECTS IN THE SINGLE-PROBE AND THE MULTIPLE-PROBE PROTOCOL , 2015 .

[24]  J. Peter Rosenfeld,et al.  Memory Detection: P300 in detecting concealed information , 2011 .

[25]  D. Wentura,et al.  Minimizing the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF) , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  K. Zou,et al.  Receiver-Operating Characteristic Analysis for Evaluating Diagnostic Tests and Predictive Models , 2007, Circulation.

[27]  Gershon Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Current Research and Potential Applications of the Concealed Information Test: An Overview , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[28]  Ewout H. Meijer,et al.  Deception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures: Conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[29]  K. Rothermund,et al.  Estimating the contributions of associations and recoding in the Implicit Association Test: the ReAL model for the IAT. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Memory detection 2 . 0 : The first web-based memory detection test , 2018 .

[31]  D. Lykken.  The GSR in the detection of guilt. , 1959 .

[32]  A. Petróczi,et al.  It is not just memory: propositional thinking influences performance on the autobiographical IAT. , 2014, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[33]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[34]  Daniël Lakens,et al.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[35]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Humans as lie detectors. , 1980, The Journal of communication.

[36]  M. Back,et al.  Reliability of Implicit Self–Esteem Measures Revisited , 2011 .

[37]  George Visu-Petra,et al.  Reaction Time‐based Detection of Concealed Information in Relation to Individual Differences in Executive Functioning , 2012 .

[38]  Mihai Varga,et al.  The RT-based Concealed Information Test: An Overview of Current Research and Future Perspectives☆ , 2014 .

[39]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[40]  A. Greenwald,et al.  The Brief Implicit Association Test. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[41]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Faking the IAT: Aided and Unaided Response Control on the Implicit Association Tests , 2005 .

[42]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Detecting concealed information with reaction times: Validity and comparison with the polygraph , 2010 .

[43]  Deryn Strange,et al.  Event familiarity influences memory detection using the aIAT , 2015, Memory.

[44]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Accuracy of Deception Judgments , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.