Differences in consumer intention to use on-demand automobile-related services in accordance with the degree of face-to-face interactions

It is important to examine the factors whereby consumers adopt on-demand services, particularly the factors related to consumer safety, to obtain the sustainable growth of on-demand services. Because consumers face physical risks as they confront service providers in person when using these on-demand services, unlike with traditional online services. This paper analyzed the effect of the level of face-to-face interaction between consumer and service provider with the adoption of on-demand services using an extended technology acceptance model. The result shows that the effects of the factors including perceived safety on adoption of on-demand services was different according to the type of on-demand services classified by the level of face-to-face interaction.

[1]  L. Chan,et al.  The adoption of new technology: the case of object-oriented computing in software companies , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[2]  Alan J. Dubinsky,et al.  A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e-commerce: A preliminary investigation , 2003 .

[3]  Fanny Schiel,et al.  The Phenomenon of the Sharing Economy in Germany: Consumer Motivations for Participating in Collaborative Consumption Schemes , 2015 .

[4]  A. D. Minin,et al.  How do companies organize nascent markets? The BlaBlaCar case in the inter-city shared mobility market , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[5]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[6]  Daeho Lee,et al.  Mobile Healthcare Applications and Gamification for Sustained Health Maintenance , 2017 .

[7]  Jean-Pierre Hubaux,et al.  PrivateRide: A Privacy-Enhanced Ride-Hailing Service , 2017, Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol..

[8]  Chanmi G. Hwang,et al.  Consumers' acceptance of wearable technology: Examining solar-powered clothing , 2014 .

[9]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[10]  Young-Man Kwon,et al.  Beacon-Based O2O Marketing for Financial Institutions , 2014 .

[11]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[12]  Munkee Choi,et al.  User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value , 2016, Telematics Informatics.

[13]  S. Sarin,et al.  Strategic Use of Bundling for Reducing Consumers’ Perceived Risk Associated with the Purchase of New High-Tech Products , 2003 .

[14]  Upender Subramanian,et al.  Strategic Surge Pricing and Forecast Communication on On-Demand Service Platforms , 2017 .

[15]  Junseok Hwang,et al.  Dividing network externality into the number of peers and users: Focusing on sociability and enjoyment in online games , 2018, Inf. Technol. People.

[16]  Xiao Chen,et al.  An Empirical Study on the Customer Channel Choice Behavior in the Overall Process of Shopping Under O2O Mode , 2016, Int. J. Web Portals.

[17]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Should On-Demand Ride Services Be Regulated? An Analysis of Chinese Government Policies , 2017 .

[18]  Jengchung V. Chen,et al.  Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[19]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[20]  S. Andaleeb An experimental investigation of satisfaction and commitment in marketing channels: The role of trust and dependence , 1996 .

[21]  Aaron Smith Shared, Collaborative and On Demand: The New Digital Economy , 2016 .

[22]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[23]  David C. Yen,et al.  The acceptance and diffusion of the innovative smart phone use: A case study of a delivery service company in logistics , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Raafat George Saadé,et al.  The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[25]  J. Drahokoupil,et al.  The Platform Economy and the Disruption of the Employment Relationship , 2016 .

[26]  C. Hoffmann,et al.  The role of privacy concerns in the sharing economy , 2017 .

[27]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[28]  Sean E. Mulholland,et al.  Ride-Sharing, Fatal Crashes, and Crime: Ride-Sharing, Fatal Crashes, and Crime , 2018 .

[29]  Tse-Ming Tsai,et al.  Pilot Study toward Realizing Social Effect in O2O Commerce Services , 2013, SocInfo.

[30]  Bernd W. Wirtz,et al.  Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis , 2010, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[31]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin,et al.  Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[33]  Kun Chang Lee,et al.  Transfer From Offline Trust to Key Online Perceptions: An Empirical Study , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[34]  Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy , 2017 .

[35]  Sung Youl Park,et al.  An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[36]  Felipe F. Dias,et al.  A behavioral choice model of the use of car-sharing and ride-sourcing services , 2017 .

[37]  Nitish Singh,et al.  Understanding international web site usage , 2006 .

[38]  J. Mattsson,et al.  Understanding Collaborative Consumption: Test of a Theoretical Model , 2017 .

[39]  Gabriele Pizzi,et al.  Shopping for fun or shopping to buy: Is it different online and offline? , 2014 .

[40]  C. Berger,et al.  SOME EXPLORATIONS IN INITIAL INTERACTION AND BEYOND: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[41]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[42]  Mohamed Khalifa,et al.  Explaining the adoption of transactional B2C mobile commerce , 2008, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[43]  S. Laforet,et al.  CONSUMERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ONLINE AND MOBILE BANKING IN CHINA , 2005 .

[44]  Gordon Burtch,et al.  Can You Gig it? An Empirical Examination of the Gig-Economy and Entrepreneurial Activity , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[45]  Xiaoling Zhu,et al.  Practical Secure Transaction for Privacy-Preserving Ride-Hailing Services , 2018, Secur. Commun. Networks.

[46]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[47]  Marie-José Huguet,et al.  Meeting points in ridesharing: A privacy-preserving approach , 2016, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[48]  Licen Indahwati Darsono Examining Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals , 2005 .

[49]  Inés Tomás,et al.  Leadership and employees' perceived safety behaviours in a nuclear power plant: A structural equation model , 2011 .

[50]  Timothy Paul Cronan,et al.  On the Test-Retest Reliability of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Scales , 1993 .

[51]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[52]  Jungwon Lee,et al.  What makes Internet users visit cyber stores again? key design factors for customer loyalty , 2000, CHI.

[53]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[54]  Valerio De Stefano The rise of the "just-in-time workforce": on-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the "gig-economy" , 2015 .

[55]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[56]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[57]  Chung-Hung Tsai Integrating Social Capital Theory, Social Cognitive Theory, and the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore a Behavioral Model of Telehealth Systems , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[58]  Jee-Won Kang,et al.  The information quality and source credibility matter in customers’ evaluation toward food O2O commerce , 2019, International Journal of Hospitality Management.

[59]  Jing Wang,et al.  An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model , 2018, Transportation.

[60]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[61]  K. Yap,et al.  Offline and online banking – where to draw the line when building trust in e‐banking? , 2010 .

[62]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[63]  Alex Rosenblat,et al.  Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers , 2016 .

[64]  Youchun Tang,et al.  Study on the Development of O2O E-commerce Platform of China from the Perspective of Offline Service Quality , 2014 .

[65]  E. Y. Kim,et al.  Modeling consumer adoption of mobile shopping for fashion products in Korea , 2009 .

[66]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[67]  C. Fullerton,et al.  Perceived Safety in Disaster Workers Following 9/11 , 2006, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[68]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Consumer Trust, Value, and Loyalty in Relational Exchanges , 2002 .

[69]  Lihua Huang,et al.  Role of trust transfer in E-commerce acceptance , 2008 .

[70]  Benjamin Edelman,et al.  Efficiencies and Regulatory Shortcuts: How Should We Regulate Companies like Airbnb and Uber? , 2015 .

[71]  Pin Luarn,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2017 .

[72]  Kirthi Kalyanam,et al.  Strategic Online and Offline Retail Pricing: A Review and Research Agenda , 2010 .

[73]  David Schleicher,et al.  Like Uber, But for Local Governmental Policy: The Future of Local Regulation of the 'Sharing Economy' , 2015 .

[74]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Customer Satisfaction with Commercial Airlines: The Role of Perceived Safety and Purpose of Travel , 2011 .

[75]  Sangjun Lee,et al.  Improving Accessibility and Security for Mobile Phone Shopping , 2006, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[76]  Zhao Jun,et al.  Investigation and Analysis of the Shenyang local O2O business model , 2014 .

[77]  Cristiano Codagnone,et al.  Scoping the Sharing Economy: Origins, Definitions, Impact and Regulatory Issues , 2016 .

[78]  Yu Cui,et al.  When should organizational change be implemented? The moderating effect of environmental dynamism between dynamic capabilities and new venture performance , 2013 .

[79]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[80]  Marcel J. T. Reinders,et al.  Wi-fi walkman: a wireless handheld that shares and recommends music on peer-to-peer networks , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[81]  Terry A. Taylor,et al.  On-Demand Service Platforms , 2017, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[82]  T. Bhatti,et al.  Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce , 2022 .

[83]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[84]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Information about information: a taxonomy of views , 2010 .

[85]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[86]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Understanding usability in mobile commerce , 2003, CACM.

[87]  Nicoletta Corrocher,et al.  The adoption of Web 2.0 services: An empirical investigation , 2011 .

[88]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[89]  Minjung Roh,et al.  Adoption of O2O food delivery services in South Korea: The moderating role of moral obligation in meal preparation , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[90]  Juan Sánchez-Fernández,et al.  Role of gender on acceptance of mobile payment , 2014, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[91]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Understanding and Using Context , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[92]  Wen-chang Hong Quanzhou Agricultural E-Commerce Platform Based on O2O Modes , 2013 .

[93]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[94]  Alain Yee-Loong Chong,et al.  Technology-Mediated Sharing Economy: Understanding User Participation in Collaborative Consumption through the Benefitcost Perspective , 2016, PACIS.

[95]  Hongbum Kim,et al.  Why Do People Consume and Provide Sharing Economy Accommodation?—A Sustainability Perspective , 2018, Sustainability.

[96]  Babu G. Baradwaj,et al.  Management innovation and cultural adaptivity in international online banking , 2008 .

[97]  A. Krueger,et al.  An Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber’s Driver-Partners in the United States , 2016 .

[98]  Peter Suedfeld,et al.  Perceived safety from crime in the urban environment , 1993 .

[99]  Yu-Wei Chang,et al.  Integration of online and offline channels: a view of O2O commerce , 2018, Internet Res..

[100]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[101]  Christoph Lattemann,et al.  USER ACCEPTANCE OF VIRTUAL WORLDS , 2008 .

[102]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..