Evaluation of four cursor control devices during a target acquisition task for laparoscopic tool control.

Current laparoscopic surgery instruments create awkward postures which produce fatigue and pressure points in surgeons. In order to alleviate some of this discomfort a new laparoscopic tool had been developed with the inclusion of an articulating end-effector manipulated by a trackball. The current study was developed to access the performance of four input devices which could replace the manual trackball in a powered laparoscopic tool. A simple Fitts' law task was conducted and the devices' performance was evaluated with both subjective and objective measures. This article makes three main contributions to the scientific community. First, it provides a comparison of four control devices (TouchPad, Mouse Button Module, MiniJoystick Module and MicroJoystick) for use in a powered laparoscopic tool. Second, it provides an understanding of how the non-traditional measure of target re-entry can be utilized to compare control devices and how this relates to the more traditional measures of throughput and error rate. Finally, it contributes to the understanding of how a user's familiarity with a control device could affect the subjective and objective performance of the device. The main results indicate that the TouchPad and MicroJoystick are the best candidate-devices for use in a powered laparoscopic tool. The article also provides support for utilizing the new measure target re-entry when comparing control performance. Although studied in the application of laparoscopic surgery, the results can be generalized for the design of any hand-held device in which the speed and accuracy of the control device is critical.

[1]  Myung-Chul Jung,et al.  Evaluation of a Surgeon-Centered Laparoscopic Tool Design to Conventional Tools , 2005 .

[2]  R. Berguer,et al.  Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments , 1998, Surgical Endoscopy.

[3]  Dmitry Oleynikov,et al.  Effect of Handle Design and Target Location on Wrist Posture during Aiming with a Laparoscopic Tool , 2004 .

[4]  Dmitry Oleynikov,et al.  Evaluation of Laparoscopic Tools for Usability and Comfort , 2004 .

[5]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices , 2001, CHI.

[6]  M.A. van Veelen,et al.  Improved physical ergonomics of laparoscopic surgery , 2004, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[7]  R. Berguer,et al.  An ergonomic comparison of in-line vs pistol-grip handle configuration in a laparoscopic grasper , 1998, Surgical Endoscopy.

[8]  I Neilson,et al.  Patterns of visual-spatial performance and 'spatial ability': dissociation of ethnic and sex differences. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[9]  Melissa Dugger,et al.  Eliminating Gender Differences Through Practice in an Applied Visual Spatial Task , 1998 .

[10]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Dmitry Oleynikov,et al.  Ergonomic Laparoscopic Tool Handle Design , 2004 .

[12]  A. Cuschieri.  Whither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectations. , 1995, American journal of surgery.

[13]  Dmitry Oleynikov,et al.  Articulating vs. conventional laparoscopic grasping tools—surgeons’ opinions , 2006 .

[14]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys, for text selection on a CRT , 1987 .

[15]  T. G. Frank,et al.  Influence of handle design on the surgeon's upper limb movements, muscle recruitment, and fatigue during endoscopic suturing , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  Myung-Chul Jung,et al.  Effect of handle design and target location on insertion and aim with a laparoscopic surgical tool. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  D. Meijer,et al.  Ergonomics and design of laparoscopic instruments: results of a survey among laparoscopic surgeons. , 1999, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[18]  Warren D. Smith,et al.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[19]  D J Lund,et al.  Laboratory simulator and field pursuit tracking performance with females and males in the presence of laser glare. , 1997, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[20]  C. Frantzides,et al.  Predicting baseline laparoscopic surgery skills , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.