THE EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY OF THE EQUIDAE AND THE ORIGINS OF RUMEN AND CECAL DIGESTION

There are two main groups of ungulates or hoofed mammals living today, perissodactyls and artiodactyls. They are distinguished by a basic difference in foot morphology, which indicates that the two groups arose independently from a basal "proto-ungulate" stock (the order Condylarthra) in the early Tertiary. This difference involves the axis of symmetry of the foot. In perissodactyls it passes through the third metapodial, while in artiodactyls it passes between the third and fourth metapodials. The perissodactyls surviving today are horses, rhinos and tapirs. The recent artiodactyls are a much larger and more diverse group, broadly covering all "cloven-hoofed" animals such as pigs, hippos, camels, deer, giraffes, antelope, cattle and sheep. The perissodactyls must have evolved by the late Paleocene, as by the early Eocene four out of five of the known superfamilies are already distinguishable (Romer, 1966). Artiodactyls are also seen in the early Eocene (Romer, 1966), but the two major groups of ruminant artiodactyls, the tylopods and the pecorans, do not appear in the fossil record until the late Eocene (Gazin, 1955) (see Fig. 1). The perissodactyls were the dominant medium to largesized herbivores during the Eocene, and in the early Oligocene a reduction in their diversity coincided with the beginning radiations of the ruminant groups of artiodactyls. These latter animals were the dominant medium-sized herbivores throughout the remainder of the Tertiary, at least in terms of species diversity. The perissodactyls originated in North America; the origin of the artiodactyls, whether in North America or in Eurasia, is still in question (Olson, 1971). As the rise of the artiodactyls at the Eocene-Oligocene boundary coincides with the decrease in the diversity of the perissodactyls, theories have been advanced to explain this coincidence in terms of perissodactyls being competitively inferior to artiodactyls. One obvious difference between the two groups is the difference in limb morphology. Although the axis of symmetry of the foot seems an unlikely candidate for conferring a selective advantage, artiodactyls do possess a unique double trochleared tarsal or ankle joint. This structure has been regarded as a key feature of the group and contributory to their evolutionary success, on the grounds that it has enabled artiodactyls to achieve rapid acceleration for predator escape (e.g., Schaeffer, 1947; Romer, 1968; Colbert, 1969). While there is little doubt that this particular adaptation was of value to the artiodactyls themselves, I do not think, however, that it had a great deal to do with the relative competitive efficiencies of these two ungulate groups. For a start, this tarsus appeared in a highly advanced condition in the first artiodactyls in the early Eocene (Schaeffer, 1947) long before their radiation and diversification, and is found in noncursorial as well as cursorial forms. In addition, modern ecological work demonstrates that predation is not necessarily detrimental

[1]  D. D. Davis Notes on the anatomy of the babirusa / by D. Dwight Davis. , 1940 .

[2]  H. Falconer,et al.  DISTRIBUTIONAL AND PHYLOGENETIC STUDIES ON INDIAN FOSSIL MAMMALS . IV THE PHYLOGENY OF THE INDIAN SUIDAE AND THE ORIGIN OF THE HIPPOPOTAMIDAE , 2022 .

[3]  D. Lewis Digestive physiology and nutrition of the ruminant. , 1961 .

[4]  C. L. Gazin A review of the upper Eocene Artiodactyla of North America , 1955 .

[5]  C. Field The food habits of wild ungulates in Uganda by analyses of stomach contents , 1972 .

[6]  Hope Ryden America's Last Wild Horses , 1970 .

[7]  J. S. Nicholas Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy , 1942, Nature.

[8]  E. L. Mccandless,et al.  Physiological changes in intermediary metabolism of various species of ruminants incident to functional development of rumen. , 1950, The American journal of physiology.

[9]  G. Phillips,et al.  Microbial Fermentation in Certain Mammals , 1959, Science.

[10]  J. Goddard FOOD PREFERENCES OF BLACK RHINOCEROS IN THE TSAVO NATIONAL PARK , 1970 .

[11]  F. T. Jung The Fire of Life , 1962 .

[12]  M. Voorhies Taphonomy and population dynamics of an early Pliocene vertebrate fauna, Knox County, Nebraska , 1969 .

[13]  B. Schaeffer Notes on the origin and function of the artiodactyl tarsus. American Museum novitates ; no. 1356 , 1947 .

[14]  J. M. Forbes,et al.  Control of feed intake and regulation of energy balance in ruminants. , 1974, Physiological reviews.

[15]  J. Barcroft,et al.  Absorption of Volatile Acids from the Alimentary Tract of the Sheep and Other Animals , 1944 .

[16]  F. Alexander Some functions of the large intestine of the horse. , 1952, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[17]  F. G. Benedict The physiology of the elephant , 1936 .

[18]  G. W. Noot,et al.  Comparative Digestibility of Components of Forages by Geldings and Steers , 1970 .

[19]  J. Lowe,et al.  Apparent digestion in various segments of the digestive tract of ponies fed diets with varying roughage-grain ratios. , 1971, Journal of animal science.

[20]  Functional Significance of the Therian Molar Pattern , 1970, Nature.

[21]  A. Phillipson.,et al.  Studies on the Fate of Carbohydrates in the Rumen of the Sheep , 1942 .

[22]  T. Houpt UREA UTILIZATION BY RABBITS FED A LOW-PROTEIN RATION. , 1963, The American journal of physiology.

[23]  J. Stewart,et al.  Food Preference Data by Faecal Analysis for African Plains Ungulates , 1970 .

[24]  O. Lowenstein,et al.  Life of Vertebrates , 1962, Nature.

[25]  B. Schmidt-nielsen,et al.  Urea excretion in the camel. , 1957, The American journal of physiology.

[26]  P. M. Butler SOME FUNCTIONAL ASPECTS OF MOLAR EVOLUTION , 1972, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  G. Haenlein,et al.  Comparative response of horses and sheep to different physical forms of alfalfa hay. , 1966 .

[28]  C. Balch Factors Affecting the Utilization of Food by Dairy Cows , 1950, British Journal of Nutrition.

[29]  C. Field,et al.  Digestion in the hippopotamus , 1973 .

[30]  G. Schaller The deer and the tiger , 1967 .

[31]  G. Sharman,et al.  Ruminant-like Digestion in a Marsupial , 1954, Nature.

[32]  D. Vesey-Fitzgerald,et al.  Grazing Succession Among East African Game Animals , 1960 .

[33]  P. V. Fonnesbeck,et al.  Rate of passage of various feedstuffs through the digestive tract of horses. , 1967, Journal of animal science.

[34]  A. Romer Notes and comments on vertebrate paleontology , 1945 .

[35]  George Gaylord Simpson,et al.  The Principles of Classification and a Classification of Mammals. , 1945 .

[36]  Leonard B. Radisky THE EARLY EVOLUTION OF THE PERISSODACTYLA , 1969, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  H. Lamprey ECOLOGICAL SEPARATION OF THE LARGE MAMMAL SPECIES IN THE TARANGIRE GAME RESERVE, TANGANYIKA† , 1963 .

[38]  C. A,et al.  A History of Land Mammals in the Western Hemisphere , 1914, Nature.

[39]  H. Schryver,et al.  Nitrogen utilization in ponies. , 1972, Journal of animal science.

[40]  R. Mackie Range ecology and relations of mule deer, elk, and cattle in the Missouri River Breaks, Montana , 1965 .

[41]  P. Langer STOMACH EVOLUTION IN THE ARTIODACTYLA , 1974 .

[42]  T. Bauchop,et al.  Ruminant-Like Digestion of the Langur Monkey , 1968, Science.

[43]  T. Wells Grazing in Terrestrial and Marine Environments , edited by D. J. Crisp, British Ecological Society Symposium Number 4 . Blackwell, 63s. , 1965, Oryx.

[44]  V. Geist The Evolution of Horn-Like Organs , 1966 .

[45]  B. Brown,et al.  Distributional and phylogenetic studies on Indian fossil mammals. 4, The phylogeny of the Indian Suidae and the origin of the Hippopotamidae. American Museum novitates ; no. 799 , 1935 .

[46]  B. Shorrocks,et al.  Animal Populations in Relation to Their Food Resources. , 1971 .