Major Molecular Response Achievement in CML Patients Can Be Predicted by BCR-ABL1/ABL1 or BCR-ABL1/GUS Ratio at an Earlier Time Point of Follow-Up than Currently Recommended

Recent studies demonstrate that early molecular response to tyrosine-kinase inhibitors is strongly predictive of outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia patients and that early response landmarks may identify patients at higher risk for transformation who would benefit from an early switch to second-line therapy. In this study, we evaluated the ability of the control gene GUS to identify relevant thresholds for known therapeutic decision levels (BCR-ABL1/ABL1IS  = 10% and 0.1%). We then defined the most relevant cut-offs for early molecular response markers (transcript level at 3 months, halving time and log reduction between diagnosis and 3 months of treatment) using GUS or ABL1. We demonstrated that, although both control genes could be used (in an equivalent way) to accurately assess early molecular response, the BCR-ABL1/GUS level at diagnosis is impacted by the higher GUS copy number over-expressed in CML cells, thus negatively impacting its ability to completely replace ABL1 at diagnosis. Furthermore, we pointed out, for the first time, that it would be helpful to monitor BCR-ABL1 levels at an earlier time point than that currently performed, in order to assess response to first-line tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and consider a potential switch of therapy as early as possible. We evaluated this optimal time point as being 19 days after the start of treatment in our cohort.

[1]  H. Einsele,et al.  Velocity of early BCR-ABL transcript elimination as an optimized predictor of outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in chronic phase on treatment with imatinib , 2014, Leukemia.

[2]  R. Larson,et al.  Early molecular response predicts outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with frontline nilotinib or imatinib. , 2014, Blood.

[3]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Deep molecular response is reached by the majority of patients treated with imatinib, predicts survival, and is achieved more quickly by optimized high-dose imatinib: results from the randomized CML-study IV. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Early response with dasatinib or imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: 3-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). , 2014, Blood.

[5]  Nicola D. Roberts,et al.  Any BCR-ABL Reduction Below 10% At 6 Months Of Therapy Significantly Improves Outcome For CML Patients With a Poor Response At 3 Months , 2013 .

[6]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  High BCR-ABL/GUSIS Levels At Diagnosis Are Associated With Unfavorable Responses To Imatinib , 2013 .

[7]  Francisco Cervantes,et al.  European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013. , 2013, Blood.

[8]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Early responses predict better outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: results with four tyrosine kinase inhibitor modalities. , 2013, Blood.

[9]  K. Rezvani,et al.  Combining BCR-ABL1 transcript levels at 3 and 6 months in chronic myeloid leukemia: implications for early intervention strategies. , 2013, Blood.

[10]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Initial molecular response at 3 months may predict both response and event-free survival at 24 months in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with nilotinib. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Assessment of Early Molecular Response As a Predictor of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in the Phase 3 BELA Study , 2012 .

[12]  A. Vekhoff,et al.  Relationship Between Molecular Responses and Disease Progression in Patients (Pts) Treated First Line with Imatinib (Im) Based Regimens: Impact of Treatment Arm within the French Spirit Trial From the French CML Group (FI LMC) , 2012 .

[13]  H. Einsele,et al.  Early molecular and cytogenetic response is predictive for long-term progression-free and overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) , 2012, Leukemia.

[14]  R. Clark,et al.  Predictive value of early molecular response in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with first-line dasatinib. , 2012, Blood.

[15]  Dong-Wook Kim,et al.  BCR-ABL1 doubling times more reliably assess the dynamics of CML relapse compared with the BCR-ABL1 fold rise: implications for monitoring and management. , 2012, Blood.

[16]  Katayoun Rezvani,et al.  Assessment of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels at 3 months is the only requirement for predicting outcome for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Long-term prognostic significance of early molecular response to imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis from the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS). , 2010, Blood.

[18]  K. Rezvani,et al.  European LeukemiaNet criteria for failure or suboptimal response reliably identify patients with CML in early chronic phase treated with imatinib whose eventual outcome is poor. , 2008, Blood.

[19]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Desirable performance characteristics for BCR-ABL measurement on an international reporting scale to allow consistent interpretation of individual patient response and comparison of response rates between clinical trials. , 2008, Blood.

[20]  Francisco Cervantes,et al.  Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Simona Soverini,et al.  Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. , 2006, Blood.

[22]  H. Cavé,et al.  Standardization and quality control studies of ‘real-time’ quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of fusion gene transcripts for residual disease detection in leukemia – A Europe Against Cancer Program , 2003, Leukemia.

[23]  F. Watzinger,et al.  Evaluation of candidate control genes for diagnosis and residual disease detection in leukemic patients using ‘real-time’ quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) – a Europe against cancer program , 2003, Leukemia.