The Use of Graphical Analysis with Microcomputer-Based Laboratories to Implement Inquiry as the Primary Mode of Learning Science

The laboratory-learning environment needs to become more exploratory and undergo a transformation from its traditional confirmatory role in the learning of science. This is necessary to effectively allow students to achieve scientific literacy. The availability of powerful tools for data collection and analysis provides an opportunity for students to engage in activities similar to those found in scientific work. An investigation of science teachers' use of microcomputer-based laboratories in inquiry-based activities shows the benefits inherent in the technology; in particular, an improvement in performance on content-related tasks and in using process skills necessary for inquiry-based learning was found. The ability to correctly predict the outcome of an experiment is strongly correlated with the agreement between different modalities used in the prediction. Thus, performance on science tasks using graphical analysis can be enhanced by the described methodology; recommendations are offered for successful implementation of inquiry-based instruction.

[1]  James J. Gallagher,et al.  A Summary of Research in Science Education--1985. , 1986 .

[2]  Heather Brasell,et al.  The effect of real‐time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity , 1987 .

[3]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[4]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[5]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics , 1987 .

[6]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Learning science through technological design , 2001 .

[7]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Professionals Read Graphs: A Semiotic Analysis , 2001 .

[8]  Peter W. Hewson,et al.  A Conceptual Change Approach to Learning Science , 1981 .

[9]  Carol L. Stuessy,et al.  Advantages of Micro-Based Labs: Electronic Data Acquisition, Computerized Graphing, or Both?. , 1989 .

[10]  Maher Z. Hashweh Toward an explanation of conceptual change , 1986 .

[11]  Mai Yin Tsoi,et al.  Learning from Inquiry-Based Laboratories in Nonmajor Biology: An Interpretive Study of the Relationships among Inquiry Experience, Epistemologies, and Conceptual Growth , 2003 .

[12]  Helen Schroeder,et al.  Inquiry and the development of positive attitudes , 1974 .

[13]  Michael J. Padilla,et al.  Effects of Laboratory Activities and Written Simulations on the Acquisition of Graphing Skills by Eighth Grade Students. , 1984 .

[14]  Michael Shayer,et al.  Accelerating the Development of Formal Thinking in Pakistan Secondary School Students: Achievement Effects and Professional Development Issues. , 2000 .

[15]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[16]  Douglas A. Lapp,et al.  Using Data-Collection Devices To Enhance Students' Understanding. , 2000 .

[17]  Young-Shin Kim,et al.  Effect on development of proportional reasoning skill of physical experience and cognitive abilities associated with prefrontal lobe activity , 2000 .

[18]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Cognitive consequences of microcomputer-based laboratories: Graphing skills development* , 1987 .

[19]  Patricia E. Blosser,et al.  The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching. , 1980 .

[20]  T. Bryce,et al.  What can they do? A review of practical assessment in Science , 1985 .

[21]  A. Lawson The relative responsiveness of concrete operational seventh grade and college students to science instruction , 1982 .

[22]  William C. Kyle,et al.  A summary of research in science education—1986. Part II , 1988 .

[23]  P. L. Adams THE ORIGINS OF INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN , 1976 .

[24]  John W. Shrum,et al.  The effects of microcomputer‐based laboratory exercises on the acquisition of line graph construction and interpretation skills by high school biology students , 1990 .

[25]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Supporting Learning of Variable Control in a Computer-Based Biology Environment: Effects of Prompting College Students to Reflect on Their Own Thinking , 1999 .

[26]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Learning Scientific Reasoning Skills in Microcomputer-Based Laboratories , 1990 .

[27]  Sara Druyan Effect of the kinesthetic conflict on promoting scientific reasoning , 1997 .

[28]  H. Gardner,et al.  Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences , 1983 .

[29]  William H. Leonard,et al.  An experimental test of an extended discretion laboratory approach for university general biology , 1989 .

[30]  Carla Zembal-Saul,et al.  Learning to Teach with Technology Model: Implementation in Secondary Science Teacher Education , 2001 .

[31]  Gili Marbach-Ad,et al.  Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions , 2000 .

[32]  R. M. Taylor,et al.  Pupil performance in graphical tasks and its relationship to the ability to handle variables , 1994 .

[33]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[34]  F. Espinoza Developing Inquiry through Activities that Integrate Fieldwork and Microcomputer-Based Technology , 2002 .

[35]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[36]  Don G. Stafford An Evaluation of the Science Curriculum Improvement Study (SCIS) Material Objects Unit at the Kindergarten Level. Final Report. , 1971 .

[37]  W. Wollman,et al.  Developmental Level and Learning to Solve Problems of Proportionality in The Classroom , 1980 .

[38]  A. Lawson A neurological model of sensory‐motor problem solving with possible implications for higher‐order cognition and instruction , 1986 .

[39]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Research on Science Laboratory Activities: In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning , 1990 .

[40]  Lisa M. Blank,et al.  A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding? , 2000 .

[41]  D. Biology meeting of the National Association for.ResearCh in'Science Teaching , 1973 .

[42]  Joseph L. Polman,et al.  Designing Project-Based Science: Connecting Learners Through Guided Inquiry (Ways of Knowing in Science Series) , 1999 .

[43]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Access to college science: microcomputer-based laboratories for the naive science learner , 1987 .

[44]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[45]  Mary B. Nakhleh,et al.  A review of microcomputer-based labs: how have they affected science learning? , 1994 .

[46]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. , 1996 .

[47]  Gerald W. Lott The effect of inquiry teaching and advance organizers upon student outcomes in science education , 1983 .

[48]  J. Shymansky,et al.  BSCS Programs: Just How Effective Were They? , 1984 .

[49]  M. Shayer,et al.  Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high school students III: Testing the permanency of effects , 1992 .

[50]  Peter Akinsola Okebukola,et al.  An Investigation of Some Factors Affecting Students' Attitudes Toward Laboratory Chemistry. , 1986 .

[51]  J. Mokros,et al.  The impact of microcomputer‐based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs , 1987 .

[52]  M. Moll,et al.  Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Biology. , 1982 .

[53]  Herman G. Weller,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Computer-Based Learning in Science , 1996 .

[54]  What Research Says , 1983 .

[55]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Affordances of computers in teacher‐student interactions: The case of interactive physics™ , 1995 .

[56]  Andrée Tiberghien,et al.  An analysis of labwork tasks used in science teaching at upper secondary school and university levels in several European countries , 2001 .

[57]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[58]  John W. Renner,et al.  Intellectual Development in Preservice Elementary School Teachers: An Evaluation. , 1975 .

[59]  Michael P. Freedman Relationship among Laboratory Instruction, Attitude toward Science, and Achievement in Science Knowledge. , 1997 .

[60]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Using Technology to Teach Thermodynamics: Achieving Integrated Understanding , 1993 .

[61]  Pamela Joy Mulhall,et al.  What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? , 2000 .

[62]  Bärbel Inhelder,et al.  Learning and the Development of Cognition , 1974 .

[63]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Re-thinking Old Ways: Towards A More Critical Approach To Practical Work In School Science , 1993 .

[64]  Connie Sparks The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching. , 1994 .