Automated method for extracting response latencies of subject vocalizations in event-related fMRI experiments☆

For functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of the neural substrates of language, the ability to have subjects performing overt verbal responses while in the scanner environment is important for several reasons. Most directly, overt responses allow the investigator to measure the accuracy and reaction time of the behavior. One problem, however, is that magnetic resonance gradient noise obscures the audio recordings made of voice responses, making it difficult to discern subject responses and to calculate reaction times. ASSERT (Adaptive Spectral Subtraction for Extracting Response Times), an algorithm for removing MR gradient noise from audio recordings of subject responses, is described here. The signal processing improves intelligibility of the responses and also allows automated extraction of reaction times. The ASSERT-derived response times were comparable to manually measured times with a mean difference of -8.75 ms (standard deviation of difference = 26.2 ms). These results support the use of ASSERT for the purpose of extracting response latencies and scoring overt verbal responses.

[1]  G I de Zubicaray,et al.  The semantic interference effect in the picture‐word paradigm: An event‐related fMRI study employing overt responses , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[2]  S. Petersen,et al.  Hemispheric Specialization in Human Dorsal Frontal Cortex and Medial Temporal Lobe for Verbal and Nonverbal Memory Encoding , 1998, Neuron.

[3]  Douglas C. Noll,et al.  Overt Verbal Responding during fMRI Scanning: Empirical Investigations of Problems and Potential Solutions , 1999, NeuroImage.

[4]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomical Differences Between Adults and School-Age Children in the Processing of Single Words , 2002, Science.

[5]  K G Munhall,et al.  Functional imaging during speech production. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[6]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[7]  H. E. Brown,et al.  Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavior interleaved gradients technique , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  An Event-Related fMRI Study of Overt and Covert Word Stem Completion , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  R W Cox,et al.  Event‐related fMRI of tasks involving brief motion , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[10]  S. Petersen,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:203–215(1998) � Functional MRI Studies of Word-Stem Completion: Reliability Across Laboratories and Comparison to Blood Flow Imaging With PET , 2022 .

[11]  S. Boll,et al.  Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction , 1979 .

[12]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Human Brain Language Areas Identified by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Functional Neuroanatomy of Single-Word Reading: Method and Validation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[14]  E. Phelps,et al.  FMRI of the prefrontal cortex during overt verbal fluency , 1997, Neuroreport.

[15]  T. Carr,et al.  Comparing cortical activations for silent and overt speech using event‐related fMRI , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[16]  S. Bookheimer.  Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.