Resistance to the tick Rhipicephalus microplus and Babesia bovis infection levels in beef heifers raised in an endemic area of Sao Paulo state, Brazil

Repeatability coefficients (r) for tick resistance and Babesia bovis infection levels and the correlation (ρ) between these traits were estimated in beef heifers, using artificial infestations and short intervals between measurements. Forty heifers, including 20 Bos taurus taurus (Caracu) and 20 Bos taurus indicus (Nelore) animals, were submitted to three artificial infestations with Rhipicephalus microplus larvae at intervals of 14 days. The number of standard female was counted from the 19th through the 23rd day after each infestation, considering only the left side of each animal. Blood samples were collected on Days 0, 6, 20, 34 and 48 after the first infestation. The number of copies of B. bovis DNA (CN) was estimated from blood samples through the quantitative PCR technique to evaluate the level of infection in the animals. Total tick count (TTC), the percentage of return (PRij) and CN were analysed using the MIXED procedure of the SAS program. The r of the variables were estimated by intraclass correlation between measures of the same animal, with the variance component of the animal being divided by the phenotypic variance (residual + animal), using models with a CS structure matrix. Additionally, ρ among variables were estimated using the CORR procedure. The following results were obtained for Caracu and Nelore animals, respectively: 1.83 ± 0.37 and 0.63 ± 0.40 for TTC, 1.10 ± 0.23 and 0.47 ± 0.23 for PRij, and 2.29 ± 0.64 and 2.32 ± 0.58 for CN. The r was moderate for TTC (0.62) and PRij (0.53) and low for CN (0.10). The ρ between TTC and CN obtained in the same measurement day was not significant in either breed (P > 0.05; –0.07 for Caracu and 0.19 for Nelore). Results showed both breeds were able to develop resistance against B. bovis; however, Nelore exhibited higher tick resistance. The r obtained for CN and the weak association with tick resistance indicate that it is not possible to recommend the use of CN as a trait to predict tick resistance in these two breeds.

[1]  R. Z. Machado,et al.  Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina infection levels estimated by qPCR in Angus cattle from an endemic area of São Paulo state, Brazil. , 2016, Ticks and tick-borne diseases.

[2]  L. Grisi,et al.  Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil. , 2014, Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria.

[3]  A. Ibelli,et al.  Quantitative study of Babesia bovis infection in beef cattle from São Paulo state, Brazil. , 2014, Ticks and tick-borne diseases.

[4]  M. M. Alencar,et al.  Resistance of beef cattle of two genetic groups to ectoparasites and gastrointestinal nematodes in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. , 2013, Veterinary parasitology.

[5]  A. O. Lau,et al.  Loss of neurovirulence is associated with reduction of cerebral capillary sequestration during acute Babesia bovis infection , 2013, Parasites & Vectors.

[6]  A. Ibelli,et al.  Resistance of cattle of various genetic groups to the tick Rhipicephalus microplus and the relationship with coat traits. , 2012, Veterinary parasitology.

[7]  J. Morton,et al.  Is endemic stability of tick-borne disease in cattle a useful concept? , 2012, Trends in parasitology.

[8]  J. R. Martins,et al.  Diagnoses of fipronil resistance in Brazilian cattle ticks (Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus) using in vitro larval bioassays. , 2010, Veterinary parasitology.

[9]  A. D. Silva,et al.  Infestação natural de fêmeas bovinas de corte por ectoparasitas na Região Sudeste do Brasil , 2010 .

[10]  C. Gondro,et al.  Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle. , 2010, International journal for parasitology.

[11]  Ana Mary da Silva,et al.  Detection of Babesia bigemina in cattle of different genetic groups and in Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus tick. , 2008, Veterinary parasitology.

[12]  N. Jonsson,et al.  Productivity and health effects of anaplasmosis and babesiosis on Bos indicus cattle and their crosses, and the effects of differing intensity of tick control in Australia. , 2008, Veterinary parasitology.

[13]  M. Florin-Christensen,et al.  A quantitative PCR assay for the detection and quantification of Babesia bovis and B. bigemina. , 2007, Veterinary parasitology.

[14]  M. R. Honer,et al.  The effect of the control of endo- and ectoparasites on weight gains in crossbred cattle (Bos taurus taurus × Bos taurus indicus) in the central region of Brazil , 2007, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[15]  Kun-song Chen,et al.  DNA quantification using EvaGreen and a real-time PCR instrument. , 2006, Analytical biochemistry.

[16]  Björn Sjögreen,et al.  The real-time polymerase chain reaction. , 2006, Molecular aspects of medicine.

[17]  Hung-Jen Liu,et al.  Development of a quantitative Light Cycler real-time RT-PCR for detection of avian reovirus. , 2006, Journal of virological methods.

[18]  M. M. Alencar,et al.  Análise de fatores genéticos e ambientais que afetam a infestação de fêmeas bovinas da raça Caracu por carrapatos (Boophilus microplus) , 2003 .

[19]  C. J. O'Neill,et al.  Using genetics to control cattle parasites-the Rockhampton experience. , 2000, International journal for parasitology.

[20]  W. Brown,et al.  Designing blood-stage vaccines against Babesia bovis and B. bigemina. , 1999, Parasitology today.

[21]  R. Bock,et al.  Effect of breed of cattle on innate resistance to infection with Babesia bovis, B bigemina and Anaplasma marginale. , 1997, Australian veterinary journal.

[22]  A. Guglielmone.  Epidemiology of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in South and Central America. , 1995, Veterinary parasitology.

[23]  A. Nari.  Strategies for the control of one-host ticks and relationship with tick-borne diseases in South America. , 1995, Veterinary parasitology.

[24]  K. Meyer,et al.  Genetic variation and covariation for growth, parasite resistance and heat tolerance in tropical cattle , 1991 .

[25]  G. Bennett.  Oviposition of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Acarida: Ixodidae). II. Influence of temperature, humidity and light. , 1974, Acarologia.

[26]  J. R. Martins,et al.  Multiple resistance to acaricides in field populations of Rhipicephalus microplus from Rio Grande do Sul state, Southern Brazil. , 2017, Ticks and tick-borne diseases.

[27]  L. Regitano,et al.  Artificial infestation of Boophilus microplus in beef cattle heifers of four genetic groups , 2007 .

[28]  M. M. Alencar,et al.  Resistência de bovinos ao carrapato Boophilus microplus . I. Infestação artificial , 1987 .

[29]  R. Wharton,et al.  Resistance to Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) in different breeds of cattle , 1978 .