Exploring welfare implications of resource equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments

Abstract Resource equivalency analysis (REA) has become the dominant method for calculating natural resource damages for biological injuries from pollution incidents. This methodology compares resources lost as a result of an incident to benefits that can be gained from a habitat or wildlife restoration project. Compensation is evaluated in terms of resource services instead of market currency. Recently, this approach has been questioned regarding its ability to provide adequate compensation based on economic welfare principles. The following paper examines these critiques and develops a model to quantify the welfare implications of using REA when some of its implicit assumptions are violated. We focus on the situation where compensatory restoration projects provide services that are comparable to those lost as a result of an incident. We examine simulation scenarios where the public has heterogeneous preferences for resources and where resource values change over time. Using the Hicks–Kaldor criterion, we find that the traditional REA provides an acceptable approximation of aggregate compensation for a reasonably wide range of economic and biological parameter combinations.

[1]  M. Keen.  Welfare analysis and intertemporal substitution , 1990 .

[2]  Katherine A. Pease,et al.  RESTORATION-BASED COMPENSATION MEASURES IN NATURAL RESOURCE LIABILITY STATUTES , 1997 .

[3]  C. Peterson,et al.  Restoration that targets function as opposed to structure: replacing lost bivalve production and filtration , 2003 .

[4]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Sequencing and Valuing Public Goods , 1998 .

[5]  D. McCay,et al.  Scaling restoration of American lobsters: combined demographic and discounting model for an exploited species , 2003 .

[6]  Richard G. Walsh,et al.  Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality , 1985 .

[7]  I. Bateman,et al.  Non-users' Willingness to Pay for a National Park: An Application and Critique of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1997 .

[8]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[9]  D. McCay,et al.  Habitat restoration as mitigation for lost production at multiple trophic levels , 2003 .

[10]  William H. Desvousges,et al.  The use of habitat equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments , 2004 .

[11]  Marisa J. Mazzotta,et al.  Natural Resource Damage Assessment: The Role of Resource Restoration , 1994 .

[12]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis , 1996 .

[13]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[14]  A. Freeman,et al.  The measurement of environmental and resource values , 1992 .

[15]  H. Galbraith,et al.  Determining Ecological Equivalence in Service-to-Service Scaling of Salt Marsh Restoration , 2002, Environmental management.

[16]  T. Dahl,et al.  Wetlands Losses in the United States 1780's to 1980's , 1990 .

[17]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Assessing natural resource damages using environmental annuities , 1994 .

[18]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Vertically Summing Public Good Demand Curves: An Empirical Comparison of Economic versus Political Jurisdictions , 2000 .

[19]  K. Rollins,et al.  The Case for Diminishing Marginal Existence Values , 1998 .

[20]  Sean P. Powers,et al.  Scaling restoration to achieve quantitative enhancement of loon, seaduck, and other seabird populations , 2003 .

[21]  T. Penn,et al.  Calculating Resource Restoration for an Oil Discharge in Lake Barre, Louisiana, USA , 2002, Environmental management.

[22]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence , 2000 .

[23]  W. Hanemann,et al.  A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting From the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill , 1992 .

[24]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Money, Who Needs It? Natural Resource Damage Assessment , 2002 .

[25]  C. Blackorby,et al.  Consumer's Surplus and Welfare Change in a Simple Dynamic Model , 1984 .

[26]  Michael Donlan,et al.  Compensatory mitigation for injury to a threatened or endangered species: scaling piping plover restoration , 2003 .