The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control?

Identification of the second of two targets is impaired if it is presented less than about 500 ms after the first. Theoretical accounts of this second-target deficit, known as attentional blink (AB), have relied on some form of limited attentional resource that is allocated to the leading target at the expense of the trailing target. Three experiments in the present study reveal a failure of resource-limitation accounts to explain why the AB is absent when the targets consist of a stream of three items belonging to the same category (e.g., letters or digits). The AB is reinstated, however, if an item from a different category is inserted in the target string. This result, and all major results in the AB literature, is explained by the hypothesis that the AB arises from a temporary loss of control over the prevailing attentional set. This lapse in control renders the observer vulnerable to an exogenously-triggered switch in attentional set.

[1]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[2]  D. Broadbent.  Perception and communication , 1958 .

[3]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[4]  A. Treisman.  Contextual Cues in Selective Listening , 1960 .

[5]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[6]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[7]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Iconic memory and visible persistence , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  L. Kempe.  Handbook of Physiology. Section I. The Nervous System , 1982 .

[9]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Tim Shallice,et al.  MULTIPLE LEVELS OF CONTROL PROCESSES , 1994 .

[11]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation , 1994 .

[12]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[13]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  J. Duncan,et al.  The Slow Time-Course of Visual Attention , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  N. Meiran.  Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .

[16]  M. Chun.  Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  V. Lollo,et al.  Beyond the attentional blink: visual masking by object substitution. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  M C Potter,et al.  Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains : Evidence from the attentional blink , 1999 .

[21]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  New Objects, Not New Features, Trigger the Attentional Blink , 2003, Psychological science.

[22]  James T. Enns,et al.  Task switching mediates the attentional blink even without backward masking , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  P. Barnard,et al.  Paying Attention to Meaning , 2004, Psychological science.

[24]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks following severe closed-head injury. , 2006, Neuropsychology.