A dedicated framework for weak biometrics in forensic science for investigation and intelligence purposes: The case of facial information

Following the deployment of strong biometric systems in forensic science (for example, finger/palmprints or DNA), additional weaker biometric data such as facial information, ear or gait, are making their way into police practices and judicial systems. Their introduction is not going without presenting new challenges because of their lower discrimination power (that is, their efficiency at distinguishing individuals). Current biometric systems are designed and deployed as stand-alone applications (operating on their own merit, detached from any other investigative information) and are not fit for purpose when dealing with less discriminating modalities such as faces. We posit in this article that, for these emergent modalities, a different framework, integrated with the policing strategy, is required. The proposed framework is designed to maximize the payoff of these modalities for investigation or intelligence purposes. The number of facial images of non-identified individuals of interest available to police forces is increasing. Their sources go from surveillance cameras, cameras from automated teller machine, personal devices and so on. We analyzed, between 2009 and 2013, data from a regional intelligence platform, used by the crime intelligence units and, show using real case examples, the potential of facial images for crime investigation and crime intelligence.

[1]  R. Malpass,et al.  Eyewitness Identification Procedures: Recommendations for Lineups and Photospreads , 1998 .

[2]  R. Kemp,et al.  Atkins v The Emperor: The ‘Cautious’ Use of Unreliable ‘Expert’ Opinion , 2010 .

[3]  Sheila Willis,et al.  Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion Association of Forensic Science Providers. , 2010, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[4]  Stuart S Kind,et al.  The scientific investigation of crime , 1987 .

[5]  Olivier Ribaux,et al.  Integrating forensic information in a crime intelligence database. , 2013, Forensic science international.

[6]  James Skerrett,et al.  Consideration of the probative value of single donor 15-plex STR profiles in UK populations and its presentation in UK courts. , 2012, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[7]  Cedric Neumann,et al.  Quantifying the weight of evidence from a forensic fingerprint comparison: a new paradigm , 2012 .

[8]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Face Matching and Retrieval in Forensics Applications , 2012, IEEE MultiMedia.

[9]  Michael C. Bromby Face, Forensic Evidence of , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[10]  Doroteo Torre Toledano,et al.  Emulating DNA: Rigorous Quantification of Evidential Weight in Transparent and Testable Forensic Speaker Recognition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[11]  D Meuwly,et al.  Forensic individualisation from biometric data. , 2006, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[12]  Christophe Champod,et al.  Linkages between Biometrics and Forensic Science , 2008 .

[13]  I. Evett,et al.  The nature of forensic science opinion--a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings. , 2006, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[14]  M. Nicole,et al.  Interpretation of partial fingermarks using an automated fingerprint identification system , 2009 .

[15]  B. Prainsack,et al.  Performing the Union: the Prüm Decision and the European dream. , 2013, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[16]  Christophe Champod,et al.  The development of an automatic recognition system for earmark and earprint comparisons. , 2012, Forensic Science International.

[17]  Patrick J. Grother,et al.  Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) Performance of Face Identification Algorithms NIST IR 8009 , 2014 .

[18]  Patrick Grother,et al.  Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) , 2014 .

[19]  Pierre Margot,et al.  The contribution of forensic science to crime analysis and investigation: forensic intelligence. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[20]  Geoffrey Stewart Morrison,et al.  Tutorial on logistic-regression calibration and fusion:converting a score to a likelihood ratio , 2013, 2104.08846.

[21]  J. Robertson ‘Life is not that simple’ , 2013 .