SPRECware: Software Tools for Standard PREanalytical Code (SPREC) Labeling – Effective Exchange and Search of Stored Biospecimens

Biobanks provide stored material to basic, translational, and epidemiological research and this material should be transferred without institute-dependent intrinsic bias. The ISBER Biospecimen Science Working Group has released a “Standard PREanalytical Code” (SPREC), which is a proposal for a standard coding of the preanalytical options that have been adopted in order to track and make explicit the preanalytical variations in the collection, preparation, and storage of specimens. In this paper we address 2 issues arising in any biobank or biolaboratory aiming at adopting SPREC: (i) reducing the burden required to adopt this standard coding, and (ii) maximize the immediate benefits of this adoption by providing a free, dedicated software tool. We propose SPRECware, a vision encompassing tools and solutions for the best exploitation of SPREC based on information technology (www.sprecware.org). As a first step, we make available SPRECbase, a software tool useful for generating, storing, managing, and exchanging SPREC-related information associated to specimens. Adopting SPREC is useful both for internal purposes (such as finding the samples having some given preanalytical features), and for exchanging the preanalytical information associated to biological samples between Laboratory Information Systems. In case of a common adoption of this coding, it would be easy to find out whether and where, among the participating Biological Resource Centers, the specimens for a given study are available in order to carry out a planned experiment.

[1]  Helen M. Moore,et al.  Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality. , 2011, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[2]  F. Guadagni,et al.  A simple and effective method to analyze membrane proteins by SDS-PAGE and MALDI mass spectrometry. , 2010, Anticancer research.

[3]  F. Guadagni,et al.  An AT‐rich region in the APC gene may cause misinterpretation of familial adenomatous polyposis molecular screening , 2012, Human mutation.

[4]  F. Guadagni,et al.  Pre-analytical operating procedures for serum Low Molecular Weight protein profiling. , 2010, Journal of proteomics.

[5]  Maria Laura De Marchis,et al.  Impact of Preanalytical Handling and Timing for Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Isolation and RNA Studies: The Experience of the Interinstitutional Multidisciplinary BioBank (BioBIM) , 2012, The International journal of biological markers.

[6]  F. Guadagni,et al.  RFID as a New ICT Tool to Monitor Specimen Life Cycle and Quality Control in a Biobank , 2011, The International journal of biological markers.

[7]  F. Guadagni,et al.  Preanalytical Procedures for DNA Studies: The Experience of the Interinstitutional Multidisciplinary BioBank (BioBIM). , 2011, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[8]  J. Vaught,et al.  Towards norms for accreditation of biobanks for human health and medical research: compilation of existing guidelines into an ISO certification/accreditation norm‐compatible format , 2007 .

[9]  Helen M. Moore,et al.  2009 Biospecimen research network symposium: advancing cancer research through biospecimen science. , 2009, Cancer research.

[10]  Thomas Burke,et al.  Human Biospecimen Research: Experimental Protocol and Quality Control Tools , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[11]  F. Betsou,et al.  Standard Preanalytical Coding for Biospecimens: Defining the Sample PREanalytical Code , 2010, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[12]  F. Guadagni,et al.  Increased plasma levels of soluble CD40 ligand correlate with platelet activation markers and underline the need for standardized pre-analytical conditions. , 2010, Clinical biochemistry.

[13]  F. Guadagni,et al.  "Proteomineering" or not? The debate on biomarker discovery in sera continues. , 2011, Journal of proteomics.