The impact of robotic rehabilitation in children with acquired or congenital movement disorders.

AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate if the robot-mediated therapy (RMT) can yield positive outcomes in children with acquired or congenital upper extremity movement disorders. METHODS This was an uncontrolled pilot study with pre-post treatment outcome comparison carried out by the Pediatric Rehabilitation Department of a Children's Hospital. The study enrolled 12 children, aged 5 to 15 years, suffering from acquired (at least 12 months post-onset) or congenital upper limb motor impairment. ETIOLOGY 4 stroke, 6 traumatic brain injuries, and 2 hemiplegic cerebral palsy. RMT was provided 3 times a week for an hour during 6 weeks for a total of 18 robot therapy sessions. The Melbourne Scale (MS) and the upper-extremity subsection of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) were used for measurement of impairment. Secondary outcome measurements were made through the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS); the Reaching Performance Scale (RPS); Parent's Questionnaire, and robot-based evaluation measurements. Specifically, authors compared the smoothness, as measured by the jerk metric, and average speed of unconstrained reaching movements. RESULTS Pre-post clinical evaluation revealed statistically significant gains for all primary and secondary metrics. In addition, significant improvement of robot-based metrics was observed. The primary outcome measurement mean (SEM) gains were 6.71 (1.29) for MS and 3.33 (0.80) for the FMA. RMT led to spasticity decreases in chronic cases, as shown by the reduction of MAS. It led to improved trunk-upper extremity postural attitude as demonstrated by improved RPS, and it was well accepted by parents and children as observed in the Parent's Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that RMT may hold rehabilitative benefits in children suffering from acquired and congenital hemiparesis.

[1]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Upper Limb Robotic Therapy for Children with Hemiplegia , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[2]  N. Hogan,et al.  A paradigm shift for rehabilitation robotics , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[3]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[4]  P. Dario,et al.  Assessing Mechanisms of Recovery During Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of the Upper Limb , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[5]  N. Hogan,et al.  A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: a pilot study. , 2008, NeuroRehabilitation.

[6]  S. Masiero,et al.  Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  S Hesse,et al.  Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS) , 2007, Clinical rehabilitation.

[8]  K. Desloovere,et al.  Comparison between the Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function and the quality of upper extremity skill tests (QUEST) in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy , 2006 .

[9]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Therapeutic Robotics: A Technology Push , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  Ian M Franks,et al.  Enhancement of motor rehabilitation through the use of information technologies. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  Fong-Chin Su,et al.  Kinematical measure for spastic reaching in children with cerebral palsy. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  A. Sterr,et al.  Intensive training in chronic upper limb hemiparesis does not increase spasticity or synergies , 2004, Neurology.

[14]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robotic Technology and Stroke Rehabilitation: Translating Research into Practice , 2004, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[15]  N. Hogan,et al.  Comparison of Two Techniques of Robot-Aided Upper Limb Exercise Training After Stroke , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[16]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy for Hemiparesis: A Review , 2004 .

[18]  M. Levin,et al.  Development and validation of a scale for rating motor compensations used for reaching in patients with hemiparesis: the reaching performance scale. , 2004, Physical therapy.

[19]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke , 2003, Neurology.

[20]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[21]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[22]  N. Hogan,et al.  Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  N. Hogan,et al.  Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Reid Benefits of a virtual play rehabilitation environment for children with cerebral palsy on perceptions of self-efficacy: a pilot study , 2002, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[25]  N. Hogan,et al.  Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? , 2001, Current opinion in neurology.

[26]  B. Volpe,et al.  Palliative treatment for stroke. , 2001, Neurologic clinics.

[27]  C. Braun,et al.  Dynamic organization of the somatosensory cortex induced by motor activity. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Roberta B. Shepherd,et al.  Exercise and Training to Optimize Functional Motor Performance in Stroke: Driving Neural Reorganization? , 2001, Neural plasticity.

[29]  N. Hogan,et al.  Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[30]  V L Towle,et al.  Reorganization of the hand somatosensory cortex following perinatal unilateral brain injury. , 2000, Neuropediatrics.

[31]  N. Hogan,et al.  Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  H. Feys,et al.  Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. , 1998, Stroke.

[33]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[34]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. , 1997, Stroke.

[35]  N. Hogan,et al.  The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[36]  S. Seber,et al.  Normal Range of Motion of the Joints of the Upper Extremity in Male Subjects, with Special Reference to Side* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[37]  V L Towle,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance studies of the reorganization of the human hand sensorimotor area after unilateral brain injury in the perinatal period. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  L M Harrison,et al.  Patterns of central motor reorganization in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  L M Harrison,et al.  Plasticity of central motor pathways in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy , 1991, Neurology.

[40]  T. Flash,et al.  Arm Trajectory Modifications During Reaching Towards Visual Targets , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  M. T. Turvey,et al.  ‘Clock’ and ‘motor’ components in absolute coordination of rhythmic movements , 1989, Neuroscience.

[42]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[43]  P. N. Kugler,et al.  Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data. , 1981, Journal of motor behavior.

[44]  P. N. Kugler,et al.  Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data. , 1981, Journal of motor behavior.

[45]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[46]  O. F. Cook DISCUSSION AND CORRESPONDENCE. , 1898, Science.

[47]  F. W. Hutton DISCUSSION AND CORRESPONDENCE. , 1898, Science.