using High-resolution correlations of strata within a sand-rich clinothem using grain fabric data, offshore New Jersey, USA

Trajectories of successive clinoform rollovers are widely applied to predict patterns of spatio-temporal sand distribution. However, the detailed internal architecture of individual clinothems is rarely documented. Understanding the textural complexities of complete topset-foreset-bottomset clinothem sequences is a key factor in understanding how and when sediment is transferred basinward. This study used high-resolution, core-based analyses of 267 samples from three research boreholes from quasi-coeval topset, foreset, and bottomset deposits of a single Miocene intrashelf clinothem recovered during Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Expedition 313, offshore New Jersey, USA. Topset deposits were subdivided into three sedimentary packages based on grain character and facies analysis, consisting of upper and lower river-dominated topset process-regime packages separated by a middle wave- and storm-dominated process-regime package. Temporal variability in topset process regime exerts a quantifiable effect on grain character across the complete depositional profile, which was used here to correlate topset deposits with time-equivalent sedimentary packages in foreset and bottomset positions. River-dominated sedimentary packages have higher sand-to-mud ratios; however, the grain character of river-dominated sedimentary packages is texturally less mature than that of wave- and storm-dominated deposits. Differences in grain character between packages dominated by different process regimes increase basinward. The novel use of quantitative grain-character data allows intraclinothem time lines to be established at a higher resolution than is possible using chronostratigraphic techniques. Additionally, stratigraphic changes in grain character were used to refine the placement of the basal sequence boundary. These results challenge the idea that clinoform trajectories and stacking patterns are sufficient to describe spatio-temporal sand-body evolution across successive clinothems.

[1]  K. Hori.  Deltas , 2021, Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences.

[2]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Filter Or Conveyor? Establishing Relationships Between Clinoform Rollover Trajectory, Sedimentary Process Regime, and Grain Character Within Intrashelf Clinothems, Offshore New Jersey, U.S.A. , 2018, Journal of Sedimentary Research.

[3]  J. Clark,et al.  Muddy sand and sandy mud on the distal Mississippi fan: Implications for lobe depositional processes , 2018 .

[4]  J. Lofi,et al.  Facies architecture of Miocene subaqueous clinothems of the New Jersey passive margin: Results from IODP-ICDP Expedition 313 , 2018, Geosphere.

[5]  R. Steel,et al.  Growth of the paleo-Orinoco shelf-margin prism: Process regimes, delta evolution, and sediment budget beyond the shelf edge , 2018 .

[6]  K. Miller,et al.  BACK TO BASICS OF SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY: EARLY MIOCENE AND MID-CRETACEOUS EXAMPLES FROM THE NEW JERSEY PALEOSHELF , 2018 .

[7]  R. Dorrell,et al.  Novel 3D sequence stratigraphic numerical model for syn-rift basins : analysing architectural responses to eustasy, sedimentation and tectonics , 2017 .

[8]  C. Pellegrini,et al.  How to make a 350-m-thick lowstand systems tract in 17,000 years: The Late Pleistocene Po River (Italy) lowstand wedge , 2017 .

[9]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Anatomy of a mixed-influence shelf edge delta, Karoo Basin, South Africa , 2016, Special Publications.

[10]  Wonsuck Kim,et al.  Coupling Between Shelf-Edge Architecture and Submarine-Fan Growth Style In A Supply-Dominated Margin , 2016 .

[11]  R. Steel,et al.  The role of tidal, wave and river currents in the evolution of mixed‐energy deltas: Example from the Lajas Formation (Argentina) , 2016 .

[12]  G. Hampson.  Towards a sequence stratigraphic solution set for autogenic processes and allogenic controls: Upper Cretaceous strata, Book Cliffs, Utah, USA , 2016, Journal of the Geological Society.

[13]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Time-Transgressive Confinement On the Slope and the Progradation of Basin-Floor Fans: Implications For the Sequence Stratigraphy of Deep-Water Deposits , 2016 .

[14]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Lateral variability in clinoform trajectory, process regime, and sediment dispersal patterns beyond the shelf‐edge rollover in exhumed basin margin‐scale clinothems , 2015 .

[15]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Slope gradient and lithology as controls on the initiation of submarine slope gullies; Insights from the North Carnarvon Basin, Offshore NW Australia , 2015 .

[16]  J. Eggenhuisen,et al.  Deep-Water Sediment Bypass , 2015 .

[17]  G. Hampson,et al.  Quantitative characterisation of deltaic and subaqueous clinoforms , 2015 .

[18]  C. Olariu.  Autogenic process change in modern deltas: Lessons for the ancient , 2014 .

[19]  S. Grundvåg,et al.  Depositional architecture and evolution of progradationally stacked lobe complexes in the Eocene Central Basin of Spitsbergen , 2014 .

[20]  K. Miller,et al.  Paleobathymetry and sequence stratigraphic interpretations from benthic foraminifera: Insights on New Jersey shelf architecture, IODP Expedition 313 , 2013 .

[21]  J. Lofi,et al.  Sequence boundaries are impedance contrasts: Core-seismic-log integration of Oligocene–Miocene sequences, New Jersey shallow shelf , 2013 .

[22]  K. Miller,et al.  Testing sequence stratigraphic models by drilling Miocene foresets on the New Jersey shallow shelf , 2013 .

[23]  M. Steckler,et al.  Subsidence and eustasy at the continental margin of eastern North America , 2013 .

[24]  K. Miller,et al.  Chronology of eocene-miocene sequences on the new jersey shallow shelf: Implications for regional, interregional, and global correlations , 2012 .

[25]  R. Steel,et al.  Shelf-Edge Delta Regime As A Predictor of Deep-Water Deposition , 2012 .

[26]  R. Steel,et al.  River‐dominated, shelf‐edge deltas: delivery of sand across the shelf break in the absence of slope incision , 2012 .

[27]  J. Bhattacharya,et al.  Delta asymmetry: Concepts, characteristics, and depositional models , 2011 .

[28]  C. Synolakis,et al.  Sedimentary Deposits from the 17 July 2006 Western Java Tsunami, Indonesia: Use of Grain Size Analyses to Assess Tsunami Flow Depth, Speed, and Traction Carpet Characteristics , 2011 .

[29]  P. Allen,et al.  Transformation of tectonic and climatic signals from source to sedimentary archive , 2011 .

[30]  R. Nanson,et al.  Dynamic spatial and temporal prediction of changes in depositional processes on clastic shorelines: Toward improved subsurface uncertainty reduction and management , 2011 .

[31]  R. Steel,et al.  Sediment supply: The main driver of shelf-margin growth , 2009 .

[32]  R. Steel,et al.  Erosional vs. accretionary shelf margins: the influence of margin type on deepwater sedimentation: an example from the Porcupine Basin, offshore western Ireland , 2009 .

[33]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Stratigraphic evolution of the upper slope and shelf edge in the Karoo Basin, South Africa , 2009 .

[34]  G. Hampson,et al.  Shelf edge and shoreline trajectories, a dynamic approach to stratigraphic analysis , 2009 .

[35]  G. Mountain,et al.  Early Miocene sequence development across the New Jersey margin , 2008 .

[36]  R. Steel,et al.  A highstand shelf-margin delta system from the Eocene of West Spitsbergen, Norway , 2008 .

[37]  J. Howell,et al.  Predicting coastal depositional style: influence of basin morphology and accommodation to sediment supply ratio within a sequence stratigraphic framework , 2008 .

[38]  R. Steel,et al.  Thick turbidite successions from supply-dominated shelves during sea-level highstand , 2006 .

[39]  K. Miller,et al.  Quantification of the effects of eustasy, subsidence, and sediment supply on Miocene sequences, mid-Atlantic margin of the United States , 2006 .

[40]  R. Steel,et al.  Shelf‐margin clinoforms and prediction of deepwater sands , 2005 .

[41]  R. Steel,et al.  Initiation of turbidity currents: outcrop evidence for Eocene hyperpycnal flow turbidites , 2004 .

[42]  R. Steel,et al.  Eocene Clinoform Growth in Front of a Storm-Wave-Dominated Shelf, Central Basin, Spitsbergen: No Significant Sand Delivery to Deepwater Areas , 2003 .

[43]  S. Castelltort,et al.  How plausible are high-frequency sediment supply driven-cycles in the stratigraphic record ? , 2003 .

[44]  J. Bhattacharya,et al.  Wave‐influenced deltas: geomorphological implications for facies reconstruction , 2003 .

[45]  R. Steel,et al.  Anatomy of shelf deltas at the edge of a prograding Eocene shelf margin, Spitsbergen , 2002 .

[46]  Y. Saito,et al.  Sediment facies and Late Holocene progradation of the Mekong River Delta in Bentre Province, southern Vietnam: an example of evolution from a tide-dominated to a tide- and wave-dominated delta , 2002 .

[47]  T. Muto,et al.  Role of autoretreat and A/S changes in the understanding of deltaic shoreline trajectory: a semi‐quantitative approach , 2002 .

[48]  K. Pye,et al.  GRADISTAT: a grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments , 2001 .

[49]  J. Alexander,et al.  The physical character of subaqueous sedimentary density flows and their deposits , 2001 .

[50]  W. Schlager,et al.  Basic Types of Submarine Slope Curvature , 2000 .

[51]  L. Pratson,et al.  Clinoform development by advection-diffusion of suspended sediment: Modeling and comparison to natural systems , 1998 .

[52]  R. Schlische,et al.  Diachronous Rifting, Drifting, and Inversion on the Passive Margin of Central Eastern North America: An Analog for Other Passive Margins , 1998 .

[53]  N. Hovius,et al.  Rates of delta progradation during highstands: consequences for timing of deposition in deep-marine systems , 1998, Journal of the Geological Society.

[54]  K. Miller,et al.  Strontium-isotope and sequence stratigraphy of the Miocene Kirkwood Formation , 1993 .

[55]  David J. Reynolds,et al.  The role of the sediment load in sequence stratigraphy: The influence of flexural isostasy and compaction , 1991 .

[56]  D. Piper,et al.  Initiation Processes and Flow Evolution of Turbidity Currents: Implications for the Depositional Record , 1991, From Shoreline to Abyss: Contributions in Marine Geology in Honor of Francis Parker Shepard.

[57]  C. Poag,et al.  A record of Appalachian denudation in postrift Mesozoic and Cenozoic sedimentary deposits of the U.S. Middle Atlantic continental margin , 1989 .

[58]  J. Grow,et al.  U.S. Atlantic Continental Margin; A typical Atlantic-type or passive continental margin , 1988 .

[59]  R. Dott,et al.  Hummocky stratification: Significance of its variable bedding sequences , 1982 .

[60]  R. Walker,et al.  Structures and Sequences in Clastic Rocks , 1982 .

[61]  C. Payton,et al.  Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level; Part 2, The depositional sequence as a basic unit for stratigraphic analysis , 1977 .

[62]  J. M. Coleman,et al.  Modern River Deltas: Variability of Processes and Sand Bodies , 1975 .

[63]  William E. Galloway,et al.  Process Framework for Describing the Morphologic and Stratigraphic Evolution of Deltaic Depositional Systems , 1975 .

[64]  D. O. Asquith.  Depositional Topography and Major Marine Environments, Late Cretaceous, Wyoming , 1970 .

[65]  J. Rich.  THREE CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTS OF DEPOSITION, AND CRITERIA FOR RECOGNITION OF ROCKS DEPOSITED IN EACH OF THEM , 1951 .

[66]  C. Wentworth.  A Scale of Grade and Class Terms for Clastic Sediments , 1922, The Journal of Geology.

[67]  J. A. Udden.  Mechanical composition of clastic sediments , 1914 .