Motorcycle Helmet Effect on a Per-Crash Basis in Thailand and the United States

Objective. To compare the effectiveness of motorcycle helmets seen in prospective on-the-street motorcycle accident investigations. The data are drawn from two detailed, in-depth studies of motorcycle accidents, in which trained investigators collected extensive accident evidence on-scene immediately after the crash. This article compares helmeted and unhelmeted motorcycle riders on a per-accident basis for fatality rates, the rate of serious (AIS > 2) brain injuries among survivors, or an outcome that involved either of the two. Methods. Nine hundred motorcycle crashes in Los Angeles and 969 crashes in Thailand were investigated in detail at the accident scenes, including photos of vehicles, skids, damage, and sometimes the rider. Helmets were collected and injury information was obtained from riders and care providers. This evidence was then used to reconstruct collision events to identify speeds, precrash motions, collision contacts, injury causation, and helmet performance. Results. In both studies, approximately 6% of riders were killed and 20–25% were hospitalized. Overall, unhelmeted riders were two to three times as likely to be killed, and three times as likely to suffer either death or survival with AIS > 2 brain injury. Unhelmeted survivors had three to four times as many AIS > 2 brain injuries as helmeted riders on a per-crash basis. Nearly 100% of riders with AIS > 4 somatic injuries died. Such injuries were 30% of Thailand fatalities and 57% of L.A. fatalities, but only about 2–3% of the overall accident population. Among the 97–98% of riders with AIS < 5 somatic injuries, helmet use could prevent about three-fourths of fatalities and brain injuries. Conclusions. Helmets were extremely effective in preventing brain injury and death in 97% of the accident population in less-than-extreme crashes. Helmet use cannot prevent all fatalities because many of those killed succumb to below-the-neck injuries that a helmet cannot prevent.

[1]  V. Kasantikul,et al.  Head and Neck Injuries in Fatal Motorcycle Collisions as Determined by Detailed Autopsy , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[2]  J F Kraus,et al.  The effect of the 1992 California motorcycle helmet use law on motorcycle crash fatalities and injuries. , 1994, JAMA.

[3]  David R. Thom,et al.  Motorcyclist head injury mechanisms -- with and without helmets , 1992 .

[4]  S E Ross,et al.  Abbreviated injury scaling of head injury as a prognostic tool for functional outcome. , 1992, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Y. Tsai,et al.  Case-control study of the effectiveness of different types of helmets for the prevention of head injuries among motorcycle riders in Taipei, Taiwan. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  David R. Thom,et al.  MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT CAUSE FACTORS AND IDENTIFICATION OF COUNTERMEASURES. VOLUME II: APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA , 1980 .

[7]  M. J. Carey,et al.  The negative impact of the repeal of the Arkansas motorcycle helmet law. , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  J F Kraus,et al.  The prevalence of non-standard helmet use and head injuries among motorcycle riders. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  W. Deutermann,et al.  MOTORCYCLE HELMET EFFECTIVENESS REVISITED , 2004 .

[10]  R. Rutledge,et al.  The association of helmet use with the outcome of motorcycle crash injury when controlling for crash/injury severity. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  J A Newman MOTORCYCLE HELMETS--THEIR LIMITS OF PERFORMANCE , 1980 .

[12]  L Stallones,et al.  Relationship of helmet use and head injuries among motorcycle crash victims in El Paso County, Colorado, 1989-1990. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  J F Kraus,et al.  Fatal injuries in motorcycle riders according to helmet use. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[14]  F P Rivara,et al.  The impact of motorcycle helmet use. , 1991, The Journal of trauma.

[15]  Jess F. Kraus,et al.  THE CHANGING EFFECT OF MOTORCYCLE HELMET USE ON MORTALITY: COMPARISONS OF DRIVERS AND PASSENGERS ON THE SAME MOTORCYCLE , 1996 .

[16]  A. Muller,et al.  Florida's motorcycle helmet law repeal and fatality rates. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[17]  C E Dare,et al.  IMPACT OF MOTORCYCLE HELMET USAGE IN COLORADO , 1978 .

[18]  C. Peek-Asa,et al.  Estimates of injury impairment after acute traumatic injury in motorcycle crashes before and after passage of a mandatory helmet use law. , 1997, Annals of emergency medicine.

[19]  R. Ulmer,et al.  Evaluation of the Repeal of the All-Rider Motorcycle Helmet Law in Florida , 2005 .

[20]  Peter Cummings,et al.  Association of helmet use with death in motorcycle crashes: a matched-pair cohort study. , 2002, American journal of epidemiology.

[21]  C C Branas,et al.  Helmet laws and motorcycle rider death rates. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  L Evans,et al.  Motorcyclist fatalities and the repeal of mandatory helmet wearing laws. , 1987, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Joseph A Kufera,et al.  Autopsy study of motorcyclist fatalities: the effect of the 1992 Maryland motorcycle helmet use law. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[24]  Hh Hurt,et al.  Accident Performance of Motorcycle and Bicycle Safety Helmets , 1994 .

[25]  T R Miller,et al.  COSTS OF INJURIES RESULTING FROM MOTORCYCLE CRASHES: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2003 .

[26]  Hugh H. Hurt,et al.  A SYSTEM FOR CODING DETAILED HEAD AND NECK INJURY DATA , 1984 .

[27]  M C Frick,et al.  Helmet effectiveness in preventing motorcycle driver and passenger fatalities. , 1988, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  V. Kasantikul,et al.  Effects of law promulgation for compulsory use of protective helmets on death following motorcycle accidents. , 1995, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.