Evaluation of the Precision-Privacy Tradeoff of Data Perturbation for Smart Metering

Smart grid users and standardization committees require that utilities and third parties collecting metering data employ techniques for limiting the level of precision of the gathered household measurements to a granularity no finer than what is required for providing the expected service. Data aggregation and data perturbation are two such techniques. This paper provides quantitative means to identify a tradeoff between the aggregation set size, the precision on the aggregated measurements, and the privacy level. This is achieved by formally defining an attack to the privacy of an individual user and calculating how much its success probability is reduced by applying data perturbation. Under the assumption of time-correlation of the measurements, colored noise can be used to even further reduce the success probability. The tightness of the analytical results is evaluated by comparing them to experimental data.

[1]  Jeannie R. Albrecht,et al.  Smart * : An Open Data Set and Tools for Enabling Research in Sustainable Homes , 2012 .

[2]  Steven B. Leeb,et al.  Power signature analysis , 2003 .

[3]  George Danezis,et al.  Differentially Private Billing with Rebates , 2011 .

[4]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Smart Meter Privacy: A Theoretical Framework , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[5]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Smart meter privacy: A utility-privacy framework , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[6]  Fernando Pérez-González,et al.  Privacy-preserving data aggregation in smart metering systems: an overview , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[7]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Data perturbation with state-dependent noise for participatory sensing , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[8]  Marek Jawurek,et al.  Smart metering de-pseudonymization , 2011, ACSAC '11.

[9]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Differential Privacy , 2006, ICALP.

[10]  Márk Jelasity,et al.  Distributional differential privacy for large-scale smart metering , 2014, IH&MMSec '14.

[11]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Differential Privacy: A Survey of Results , 2008, TAMC.

[12]  G. W. Hart,et al.  Nonintrusive appliance load monitoring , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[13]  Suman Nath,et al.  Differentially private aggregation of distributed time-series with transformation and encryption , 2010, SIGMOD Conference.

[14]  M. Kintner-Meyer,et al.  Loads Providing Ancillary Services: Review of International Experience , 2008 .

[15]  Claude Castelluccia,et al.  I Have a DREAM! (DiffeRentially privatE smArt Metering) , 2011, Information Hiding.

[16]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Achieving differential privacy of data disclosure in the smart grid , 2014, IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[17]  Moni Naor,et al.  Our Data, Ourselves: Privacy Via Distributed Noise Generation , 2006, EUROCRYPT.

[18]  Christoph Krauß,et al.  Distributed Privacy-Preserving Aggregation of Metering Data in Smart Grids , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[19]  Giacomo Verticale,et al.  Privacy-preserving smart metering with multiple data Consumers , 2013, Comput. Networks.

[20]  Elaine Shi,et al.  Privacy-Preserving Aggregation of Time-Series Data , 2011, NDSS.

[21]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis , 2006, TCC.

[22]  George Danezis,et al.  Smart meter aggregation via secret-sharing , 2013, SEGS '13.

[23]  Elaine Shi,et al.  Privacy-Preserving Stream Aggregation with Fault Tolerance , 2012, Financial Cryptography.

[24]  Hao Chen,et al.  Noise Injection for Search Privacy Protection , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering.

[25]  Patrick D. McDaniel,et al.  Protecting consumer privacy from electric load monitoring , 2011, CCS '11.

[26]  Annabelle Lee,et al.  Guidelines for Smart Grid Cyber Security , 2010 .

[27]  G. Danezis,et al.  Privacy Technologies for Smart Grids - A Survey of Options , 2012 .