A disaster risk management performance index

The Risk Management Index, RMI, proposed in this paper, brings together a group of indicators that measure risk management performance and effectiveness. These indicators reflect the organizational, development, capacity and institutional actions taken to reduce vulnerability and losses in a given area, to prepare for crisis and to recover efficiently from disasters. This index is designed to assess risk management performance. It provides a quantitative measure of management based on predefined qualitative targets or benchmarks that risk management efforts should aim to achieve. The design of the RMI involved establishing a scale of achievement levels or determining the distance between current conditions and an objective threshold or conditions in a reference country, sub-national region, or city. The proposed RMI is constructed by quantifying four public policies, each of which is described by six indicators. The mentioned policies include the identification of risk, risk reduction, disaster management, and governance and financial protection. Risk identification comprises the individual perception, social representation and objective assessment; risk reduction involves the prevention and mitigation; disaster management comprises response and recovery; and, governance and financial protection policy is related to institutionalization and risk transfer. Results at the urban, national and sub-national levels, which illustrate the application of the RMI in those scales, are finally given.

[1]  Walter Gillis Peacock,et al.  Measuring Disaster Impact on Household Living Conditions: The Domestic Assets Approach , 1992 .

[2]  Horia Alejandro Barbat Barbat,et al.  Sistema de indicadores para la evaluación de riesgos , 2005 .

[3]  O. Cardona.  Indicators of Disaster Risk and Risk Management , 2005 .

[4]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  "Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation" (SMCE)" , 2003 .

[5]  Horia Alejandro Barbat Barbat,et al.  Metodología para la evaluación del desempeño de la gestión del riesgo , 2004 .

[6]  P. Debels,et al.  IUPA: a tool for the evaluation of the general usefulness of practices for adaptation to climate change and variability , 2009 .

[7]  Stéphane Kluser,et al.  Reducing Disaster Risk: a challenge for development , 2004 .

[8]  R. Davidson.  An urban earthquake disaster risk index , 1997 .

[9]  Cardona Arboleda,et al.  Estimación holística del riesgo sísmico utilizando sistemas dinámicos complejos , 2001 .

[10]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[11]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[12]  S. Cutter.  Environmental Risks and Hazards , 1993 .

[13]  Karen G. Taylor.  Crucibles of Hazard: Mega-Cities and Disasters in Transition , 2000 .

[14]  M. L. Carreño,et al.  Urban Seismic Risk Evaluation: A Holistic Approach , 2007 .

[15]  Mustafa Erdik,et al.  Issues in urban earthquake risk , 1994 .

[16]  Thomas M. Mitchell,et al.  AN OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR MAINSTREAMING DISASTER RISK REDUCTION , 2003 .

[17]  L. Comfort.  Shared Risk: Complex Systems in Seismic Response , 1999 .