Wisconsin Card Sorting Test with macaque monkeys

Abstract The Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) is a clinical test that is highly sensitive to damage in the prefrontal cortex. To establish an animal model in which neural bases of the cognitive functions necessary for the execution of the WCST can be examined with a variety of neuroscience methods, we trained two macaque monkeys in a version of the WCST with two dimensions. A sample had to be matched with one of three test items by either matching in color or shape. The monkeys had to find the relevant sensory dimension and to detect sudden changes in matching rules based only on reward and error signals. Both monkeys succeeded in more than 10 rule shifts within a day. Several probe tests showed that the monkeys in fact used the dimension-based matching rules. Each rule shift was generalized from the experience of some samples to all of the others in the sample set, and rules were immediately applied to newly introduced samples. The frequent shifts could be overcome only with a representation of the sensory dimension in working memory. Thus, we have established an animal model in which the relevant sensory dimension is stored in working memory, updated by assessing behavioral outcomes, and used to guide matching behavior.

[1]  R. Heaton,et al.  The utility of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in detecting and localizing frontal lobe lesions. , 1980, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[2]  Y. Miyashita Neuronal correlate of visual associative long-term memory in the primate temporal cortex , 1988, Nature.

[3]  Masataka Watanabe,et al.  Prefrontal unit activity and delayed response: Relation to cue location versus direction of response , 1976, Brain Research.

[4]  J. Grafman,et al.  Relationship between frontal lobe lesions and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with multiple sclerosis , 1994, Neurology.

[5]  K. C. Anderson,et al.  Single neurons in prefrontal cortex encode abstract rules , 2001, Nature.

[6]  E. A. Berg,et al.  A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. , 1948, The Journal of general psychology.

[7]  S. Wise,et al.  Rule-dependent neuronal activity in the prefrontal cortex , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  D. Stuss,et al.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  E. Drewe,et al.  The effect of type and area of brain lesion on Wisconsin card sorting test performance. , 1974, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[10]  A C Roberts,et al.  6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of the prefrontal cortex in monkeys enhance performance on an analog of the Wisconsin Card Sort Test: possible interactions with subcortical dopamine , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  H Eichenbaum,et al.  Learning and memory for hierarchical relationships in the monkey: effects of aging. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Behavioral evidence for working memory of sensory dimension in macaque monkeys , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[13]  H. Nelson A Modified Card Sorting Test Sensitive to Frontal Lobe Defects , 1976, Cortex.

[14]  A C Roberts,et al.  Primate analogue of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: effects of excitotoxic lesions of the prefrontal cortex in the marmoset. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  B. Milner Effects of Different Brain Lesions on Card Sorting: The Role of the Frontal Lobes , 1963 .

[16]  A. M. Schrier,et al.  Consecutive intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in monkeys. , 1969 .

[17]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates , 1991, Nature.

[18]  J. Fuster Inferotemporal units in selective visual attention and short-term memory. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Tanji,et al.  Neuronal activity in the primate prefrontal cortex in the process of motor selection based on two behavioral rules. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  H. Niki,et al.  Encoding of behavioral significance of visual stimuli by primate prefrontal neurons: relation to relevant task conditions , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Masamichi Sakagami,et al.  The hierarchical organization of decision making in the primate prefrontal cortex , 1999, Neuroscience Research.

[22]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Representation of the Quantity of Visual Items in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[23]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Problem solving and functional design features: experiments on cotton-top tamarins,Saguinus oedipus oedipus , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  M. R. D'Amato,et al.  The person concept in monkeys (Cebus apella) , 1988 .

[25]  H. Damasio,et al.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance as a measure of frontal lobe damage. , 1991, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[26]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  D. A. Grant,et al.  The relative difficulty of the number, form, and color concepts of a Weigl-type problem. , 1949, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Shintaro Funahashi,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of executive control by the prefrontal cortex , 2001, Neuroscience Research.

[29]  K Tsutsui,et al.  Interference from irrelevant features on visual discrimination by macaques (Macaca fuscata): a behavioral analogue of the human Stroop effect. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[30]  R. Heaton Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual , 1993 .

[31]  P. Goldman-Rakic Cellular and circuit basis of working memory in prefrontal cortex of nonhuman primates. , 1990, Progress in brain research.

[32]  L. Rothblat,et al.  Intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in the monkey within and across sensory modalities. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[33]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Functional MRI of Macaque Monkeys Performing a Cognitive Set-Shifting Task , 2002, Science.

[34]  H. Davis,et al.  Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  E. Weigl,et al.  On the psychology of so-called processes of abstraction. , 1941 .