Sound pleasantness evaluation of pedestrian walks in urban sound environments

The health benefits of a daily physical activity, and of walking in particular, are widely acknowledged. However, walking in urban environment inevitably leads to an increased exposure to noise, which forms a drawback of choosing this transportation mode. Being able to estimate the sound pleasantness associated with an urban walk trip has many potential applications, such as informing pedestrians about the sound along their intended walk, which may help them to optimize their route choice. In the past decade, various studies have focused on characterizing and estimating the sound pleasantness perceived at specific locations, on the basis of perceptive and physical measurements. However, to estimate the sound pleasantness along an urban walking trip, an additional step is required, which consists of assessing how a pedestrian evaluates the overall pleasantness of a sound environment that varies along the walking trip. In this work, the results of two laboratory experiments and one field experiment are discussed, which were designed to assess the overall evaluation of the sound environment along an urban walk. Physical and perceptive measurements at specified positions or continuously along a series of tested routes are available, in addition to a global evaluation of the route. A comparison between the results of the three experiments provides a rich source of information to understand how the sound pleasantness of a pedestrian walk is evaluated. The main conclusion is that for short walks (of about 1 minute), a recency effect is observed, which tends to disappear when the duration of the walk increases.

[1]  C. Lavandier,et al.  Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban environment , 2002 .

[2]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Soundwalk approach to identify urban soundscapes individually. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Lindsay M. Braun,et al.  A29 - The Benefits of Street-Scale Features for Walking and Biking , 2016 .

[4]  C. Lavandier,et al.  The contribution of sound source characteristics in the assessment of urban soundscapes , 2006 .

[5]  J. Steffens,et al.  Trend Effects in Momentary and Retrospective Soundscape Judgments , 2015 .

[6]  Takeo Hashimoto,et al.  The impact of sound quality on annoyance caused by road traffic noise: an influence of frequency spectra on annoyance , 2000 .

[7]  Dick Botteldooren,et al.  Exploring the use of mobile sensors for noise and black carbon measurements in an urban environment , 2012 .

[8]  Daniel Västfjäll The “end effect” in retrospective sound quality evaluation , 2004 .

[9]  Jerry Bauck,et al.  Generalized transaural stereo and applications , 1996 .

[10]  D. Botteldooren,et al.  The Influence of Traffic Noise on Appreciation of the Living Quality of a Neighborhood , 2011, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[11]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Non-auditory factors affecting urban soundscape evaluation. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  B. Berglund,et al.  Annoyance and Spectral Contrast are Cues for Similarity and Preference of Sounds , 2002 .

[13]  Catherine Lavandier,et al.  Sound quality indicators for urban places in Paris cross-validated by Milan data. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Bert De Coensel,et al.  Effects of natural sounds on the perception of road traffic noise. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Zhishi Guo,et al.  Does the pedestrian environment affect the utility of walking? A case of path choice in downtown Boston , 2009 .

[16]  Yuji Murayama,et al.  Modelling of urban green space walkability: Eco-friendly walk score calculator , 2011, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..