Impact of patient risk on the hospital volume-outcome relationship in coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND The impact of surgical risk on the relationship between hospital volume and outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is uncertain. We assessed (1) whether in-hospital mortality rates differ across lower- and higher-volume hospitals by expected surgical risk and (2) whether high-risk patients are more likely to undergo CABG at low-volume centers. METHODS We used clinical data on 27,355 adults who underwent CABG at 68 hospitals in California between 1997 and 1998. Hospitals were divided into low-volume (n=44), medium-volume (n=19), and high-volume (n=5) categories on the basis of tertiles of annual CABG volume. Using hierarchical logistic regression and log-binomial regression models, we assessed for differences in in-hospital mortality rates across hospital volume categories and the likelihood of CABG being performed in each hospital volume category after adjusting for expected surgical risk. RESULTS Differences in adjusted in-hospital mortality rates between low- and high-volume centers rose as the expected risk of in-hospital death increased: 0.8% vs 0.4% at the 20th risk percentile and 3.8% vs 2.5% at the 80th risk percentile (P<.001 for all comparisons). While a similar trend was seen between medium- and high-volume centers, absolute differences were substantially smaller. The likelihood of patients having surgery at a low-volume center also rose significantly with expected surgical risk (relative risk of undergoing CABG at a low-volume center for patients at 80th vs 20th risk percentile, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.51; P<.001]). CONCLUSION High-risk patients are more likely to undergo CABG at low-volume facilities where their risk of dying is higher.

[1]  A. Enthoven,et al.  Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Constance K Haan,et al.  Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery. , 2004, JAMA.

[3]  Alain C Enthoven,et al.  Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. 1979. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  D. Cortese,et al.  Referral selection bias in the Medicare hospital mortality prediction model: are centers of referral for Medicare beneficiaries necessarily centers of excellence? , 1994, Health services research.

[6]  K. Johansen,et al.  Selective Referral to High-Volume Hospitals , 2000 .

[7]  Ethan A Halm,et al.  Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians' referrals for cardiac catheterization. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Xiaonan Xue,et al.  Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  H. Davies,et al.  When can odds ratios mislead? , 1998, BMJ.

[11]  R. Brook,et al.  Regionalization of Cardiac Surgery in the United States and Canada , 1996 .

[12]  A Milstein,et al.  Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. , 2000, JAMA.

[13]  E L Hannan,et al.  Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: The Relationship Between Inhospital Mortality Rate and Surgical Volume After Controlling For Clinical Risk Factors , 1991, Medical care.

[14]  Edward L. Hannan,et al.  Investigation of the Relationship Between Volume and Mortality for Surgical Procedures Performed in New York State Hospitals , 1989 .

[15]  K A Eagle,et al.  The role of hospital volume in coronary artery bypass grafting: is more always better? , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  A. Vonhippel Coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1977 .

[17]  R. Brook,et al.  Regionalization of cardiac surgery in the United States and Canada. Geographic access, choice, and outcomes. , 1995, JAMA.

[18]  H S Luft,et al.  Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery —scheduled vs nonscheduled operations , 1987, JAMA.

[19]  Mortality in Medicare beneficiaries following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in states with and without certificate of need regulation. , 2002 .

[20]  H. Luft,et al.  The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? , 1987, Health services research.

[21]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Should Volume Standards for Cardiovascular Surgery Focus Only on High-Risk Patients? , 2003, Circulation.

[22]  J. Deeks When can odds ratios mislead? , 1998 .

[23]  D. Whellan,et al.  Effects of admission to a teaching hospital on the cost and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  R. E. Clark Outcome as a function of annual coronary artery bypass graft volume. The Ad Hoc Committee on Cardiac Surgery Credentialing of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[25]  H. Luft Better for whom? Policy implications of acting on the relation between volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.