Reduced frequency and severity of residential fires following delivery of fire prevention education by on-duty fire fighters: cluster randomized controlled study.

INTRODUCTION In 2008, Surrey Fire Services, British Columbia, commenced a firefighter-delivered, door-to-door fire-prevention education and smoke alarm examination/installation initiative with the intention of reducing the frequency and severity of residential structure fires in the City of Surrey. METHOD High-risk zones within the city were identified and 18,473 home visits were undertaken across seven temporal delivery cohorts (13.8% of non-apartment dwellings in the city). The frequency and severity of fires pre- and post- the home visit intervention was examined in comparison to randomized high-risk cluster controls. RESULTS Overall, the frequency of fires was found to have reduced in the city overall, however, the reduction in the intervention cohorts was significantly larger than for controls. Furthermore, when fires did occur within the intervention cohorts, smoke detectors were activated more frequently and the fires were confined to the object of origin more often post-home visits. No equivalent pattern was observed for the cluster control. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY On-duty fire fighters can reduce the frequency and severity of residential fires through targeted, door-to-door distribution of fire prevention education in high-risk areas.

[1]  M R Douglas,et al.  Cost effectiveness analysis of a smoke alarm giveaway program in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma , 2001, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[2]  Ulrich Heininger,et al.  A Comparative Efficacy Trial in Germany in Infants Who Received Either the Lederle/Takeda Acellular Pertussis Component DTP (DTaP) Vaccine, the Lederle Whole-Cell Component DTP Vaccine, or DT Vaccine , 1998, Pediatrics.

[3]  Martha Murphy,et al.  Social Media and the Fire Service , 2013 .

[4]  SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS AND THE INCIDENCE OF FIRE , 1997 .

[5]  W. Ray,et al.  Predictors of mortality from fires in young children. , 1998, Pediatrics.

[6]  T. Klassen,et al.  Home safety measures and the risk of unintentional injury among young children: a multicentre case–control study , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[7]  Ken Pease,et al.  Prospective hot-spotting - The future of crime mapping? , 2004 .

[8]  Lynne Warda,et al.  Interventions to Prevent Residential Fire Injury , 2008 .

[9]  M R Douglas,et al.  Comparison of community based smoke detector distribution methods in an urban community , 1998, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[10]  David A. Sleet,et al.  Handbook of injury and violence prevention , 2007 .

[11]  Frank C. Leeming,et al.  A behavioral approach to reducing fires in public housing , 1998 .

[12]  J. Grisso,et al.  An injury prevention program in an urban African-American community. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[13]  G. Istre,et al.  Surveillance and prevention of residential-fire injuries. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Charles R. Jennings Socioeconomic Characteristics and Their Relationship to Fire Incidence: A Review of the Literature , 1999 .

[15]  I. Roberts,et al.  The “Let's Get Alarmed!” initiative: a smoke alarm giveaway programme , 1999, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[16]  M. McCormick,et al.  Correlates of reported smoke detector usage in an inner-city population: participants in a smoke detector give-away program. , 1988, American journal of public health.

[17]  J. Higgins,et al.  Systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to promote smoke alarms , 2000, Archives of disease in childhood.

[18]  S. Chainey,et al.  Mapping Crime: Understanding Hot Spots , 2014 .