Tree phenology responses to winter chilling, spring warming, at north and south range limits

Summary Increases in primary production may occur if plants respond to climate warming with prolonged growing seasons, but not if local adaptation, cued by photoperiod, limits phenological advance. It has been hypothesized that trees with diffuse-porous xylem anatomy and early successional species may respond most to warming. Within species, northern populations may respond most due to the fact that growing seasons are relatively short. Species most sensitive to spring temperature may show little overall response to warming if reduced chilling in fall/winter offsets accelerated winter/spring development. Because current thermal models consider only highly aggregated variables, for example degree-days or chilling units (temperature sums for a season or year), they may not accurately represent warming effects. We show that assumptions contained in current thermal (degree-day) models are unrealistic for climate change analysis. Critical threshold parameters are not identifiable, and they do not actually have much to do with thresholds for development. Traditional models further overlook the discrete nature of observations, observation error and the continuous response of phenological development to temperature variation. An alternative continuous development model (CDM) that addresses these problems is applied to a large experimental warming study near northern and southern boundaries of 15 species in the eastern deciduous forest of the USA, in North Carolina and Massachusetts. Results provide a detailed time course of phenological development, including vernalization during winter and warming in spring, and challenge the basic assumptions of thermal models. Where traditional models find little evidence of a chilling effect (most are insignificant or have the wrong sign), the continuous development model finds evidence of chilling effects in most species. Contrary to the hypothesis that northern populations respond most, we find southern populations are most responsive. Because northern populations already have a compressed period for spring development, they may lack flexibility to further advance development. A stronger response in the southern range could allow residents to resist northward migration of immigrants as climate warms. If potential invaders fail to exploit a prolonged growing season to the same degree as residents, then there is a resident advantage. Hypothesized effects of warming for xylem anatomy and successional status are not supported by the 15 species in this study.

[1]  J. Bailey,et al.  Temperature regulation of bud-burst phenology within and among years in a young Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) plantation in western Washington, USA. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[2]  K. Bradford,et al.  Water Relations of Seed Development and Germination in Muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) : III. Sensitivity of Germination to Water Potential and Abscisic Acid during Development. , 1990, Plant physiology.

[3]  D. Ruiz,et al.  Dormancy in temperate fruit trees in a global warming context: A review , 2011 .

[4]  C. Tucker,et al.  Climate-Driven Increases in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 1982 to 1999 , 2003, Science.

[5]  K. Bradford,et al.  Applications of hydrotime analysis in seed testing , 2004 .

[6]  J. Mexal,et al.  Seedling cold hardiness, bud set, and bud break in nine provenances of Pinus greggii Engelm. , 2008 .

[7]  Rebecca A Montgomery,et al.  Leaf phenology in relation to canopy closure in southern Appalachian trees. , 2008, American journal of botany.

[8]  W. C. Ashby,et al.  Nursery establishment, phenology and growth of silver maple related to provenance☆ , 1992 .

[9]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Growing season extended in Europe , 1999, Nature.

[10]  James S. Clark,et al.  Failure to migrate: lack of tree range expansion in response to climate change , 2012 .

[11]  Kai Zhu,et al.  Individual-scale variation, species-scale differences: inference needed to understand diversity. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[12]  Kai Zhu,et al.  More than the sum of the parts: forest climate response from joint species distribution models. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[13]  C. Parmesan Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming , 2007 .

[14]  Isabelle Chuine,et al.  Phenology is a major determinant of tree species range , 2001 .

[15]  Heikki Hänninen,et al.  Effects of climatic change on trees from cool and temperate regions: an ecophysiological approach to modelling of bud burst phenology , 1995 .

[16]  Conghe Song,et al.  Topography-mediated controls on local vegetation phenology estimated from MODIS vegetation index , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  M. Lechowicz,et al.  Predicting the timing of budburst in temperate trees , 1992 .

[18]  Andrew D. Richardson,et al.  Phenology of a northern hardwood forest canopy , 2006 .

[19]  Elizabeth R. Ellwood,et al.  Forecasting phenology under global warming , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  H. Hänninen,et al.  Dormancy release of Norway spruce under climatic warming: testing ecophysiological models of bud burst with a whole-tree chamber experiment. , 2007, Tree physiology.

[21]  A. Miller‐Rushing,et al.  Forecasting phenology: from species variability to community patterns. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[22]  Jacques Roy,et al.  Changes in leaf phenology of three European oak species in response to experimental climate change. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[23]  C. Sabajo,et al.  Vessel formation in relation to leaf phenology in pedunculate oak and European ash , 2011 .

[24]  Kai Zhu,et al.  Dual impacts of climate change: forest migration and turnover through life history , 2014, Global change biology.

[25]  B. Cook,et al.  Divergent responses to spring and winter warming drive community level flowering trends , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  A. Fitter,et al.  Rapid Changes in Flowering Time in British Plants , 2002, Science.

[27]  Richard J. Norby,et al.  Phenological responses in maple to experimental atmospheric warming and CO2 enrichment , 2003 .

[28]  M. Lechowicz,et al.  The Relation of Foliar Phenology to Xylem Embolism in Trees , 1992 .

[29]  P. Ciais,et al.  Spring temperature change and its implication in the change of vegetation growth in North America from 1982 to 2006 , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Denis Loustau,et al.  Sensitivity of water and carbon fluxes to climate changes from 1960 to 2100 in European forest ecosystems , 2006 .

[31]  Sylvain Delzon,et al.  Leaf phenology sensitivity to temperature in European trees: do within-species populations exhibit similar responses? , 2009 .

[32]  J. William Munger,et al.  Exchange of Carbon Dioxide by a Deciduous Forest: Response to Interannual Climate Variability , 1996, Science.

[33]  Rik Leemans,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. , 2006 .

[34]  Jerry Melillo,et al.  The seasonal timing of warming that controls onset of the growing season. , 2014, Global change biology.

[35]  Xiangming Xiao,et al.  Spatial analysis of growing season length control over net ecosystem exchange , 2005 .

[36]  Isabelle Chuine,et al.  Modelling the timing of Betula pubescens budburst. II. Integrating complex effects of photoperiod into process-based models , 2011 .

[37]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change , 2012, Nature.

[38]  Peter Müller,et al.  INCORPORATING MULTIPLE SOURCES OF STOCHASTICITY INTO DYNAMIC POPULATION MODELS , 2003 .

[39]  M. Cannell,et al.  Date of budburst of fifteen tree species in Britain following climatic warming , 1989 .

[40]  J. Aber,et al.  Soil warming and carbon-cycle feedbacks to the climate system. , 2002, Science.

[41]  Isabelle Chuine,et al.  Leaf phenology in 22 North American tree species during the 21st century , 2009 .

[42]  Pankaj Agarwal,et al.  Inferential ecosystem models, from network data to prediction. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[43]  Maria E. Eriksson,et al.  The dynamic nature of bud dormancy in trees: environmental control and molecular mechanisms. , 2012, Plant, cell & environment.

[44]  Denis-Didier Rousseau,et al.  Fitting models predicting dates of flowering of temperate‐zone trees using simulated annealing , 1998 .

[45]  Christian Körner,et al.  Phenology Under Global Warming , 2010, Science.

[46]  D. Hollinger,et al.  Influence of spring phenology on seasonal and annual carbon balance in two contrasting New England forests. , 2009, Tree physiology.

[47]  S. Aitken,et al.  Adaptive gradients and isolation-by-distance with postglacial migration in Picea sitchensis , 2007, Heredity.

[48]  Jianwu Tang,et al.  Regional-scale phenology modeling based on meteorological records and remote sensing observations , 2012 .

[49]  T. A. Black,et al.  Predicting the onset of net carbon uptake by deciduous forests with soil temperature and climate data: a synthesis of FLUXNET data , 2005, International journal of biometeorology.

[50]  Chang-Hoi Ho,et al.  Phenology shifts at start vs. end of growing season in temperate vegetation over the Northern Hemisphere for the period 1982–2008 , 2011 .

[51]  J. Schaber,et al.  Responses of spring phenology to climate change , 2004 .

[52]  Maria A. Terres,et al.  Modeling daily flowering probabilities: expected impact of climate change on Japanese cherry phenology , 2014, Global change biology.

[53]  C. D. Keeling,et al.  Increased activity of northern vegetation inferred from atmospheric CO2 measurements , 1996, Nature.

[54]  P. Wareing,et al.  Photoperiodism in Woody Plants , 1956 .

[55]  H. Hänninen,et al.  Models of the spring phenology of boreal and temperate trees: Is there something missing? , 2006, Tree physiology.

[56]  I. Chuine Why does phenology drive species distribution? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  Richard B Primack,et al.  Leaf-out phenology of temperate woody plants: from trees to ecosystems. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[58]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[59]  Maria A. Terres,et al.  Analyzing first flowering event data using survival models with space and time‐varying covariates , 2013 .

[60]  H. Mooney,et al.  Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  M. Dietze,et al.  Estimating colonization potential of migrant tree species , 2009 .

[62]  Mark D. Schwartz,et al.  Green-wave phenology , 1998, Nature.