Pediatric chest and abdominopelvic CT: organ dose estimation based on 42 patient models.

PURPOSE To estimate organ dose from pediatric chest and abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) examinations and evaluate the dependency of organ dose coefficients on patient size and CT scanner models. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study and did not require informed patient consent. A validated Monte Carlo program was used to perform simulations in 42 pediatric patient models (age range, 0-16 years; weight range, 2-80 kg; 24 boys, 18 girls). Multidetector CT scanners were modeled on those from two commercial manufacturers (LightSpeed VCT, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis; SOMATOM Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany). Organ doses were estimated for each patient model for routine chest and abdominopelvic examinations and were normalized by volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)). The relationships between CTDI(vol)-normalized organ dose coefficients and average patient diameters were evaluated across scanner models. RESULTS For organs within the image coverage, CTDI(vol)-normalized organ dose coefficients largely showed a strong exponential relationship with the average patient diameter (R(2) > 0.9). The average percentage differences between the two scanner models were generally within 10%. For distributed organs and organs on the periphery of or outside the image coverage, the differences were generally larger (average, 3%-32%) mainly because of the effect of overranging. CONCLUSION It is feasible to estimate patient-specific organ dose for a given examination with the knowledge of patient size and the CTDI(vol). These CTDI(vol)-normalized organ dose coefficients enable one to readily estimate patient-specific organ dose for pediatric patients in clinical settings. This dose information, and, as appropriate, attendant risk estimations, can provide more substantive information for the individual patient for both clinical and research applications and can yield more expansive information on dose profiles across patient populations within a practice.

[1]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  J. Baró,et al.  PENELOPE: An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of the penetration and energy loss of electrons and positrons in matter , 1995 .

[3]  J. Boone,et al.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. , 2011, Radiology.

[4]  W. Paul Segars,et al.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part II. Application to patients. , 2010, Medical physics.

[5]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners. , 2010, Medical physics.

[6]  W. Eckelman,et al.  NCRP report no. 93: Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland (1987). US$15.00 , 1988 .

[7]  Wesley E Bolch,et al.  Organ doses for reference pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulation. , 2012, Medical physics.

[8]  John M Boone,et al.  Radiation exposure from CT scans: how to close our knowledge gaps, monitor and safeguard exposure--proceedings and recommendations of the Radiation Dose Summit, sponsored by NIBIB, February 24-25, 2011. , 2012, Radiology.

[9]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. , 2011, Radiology.

[10]  W P Segars,et al.  Realistic CT simulation using the 4D XCAT phantom. , 2008, Medical physics.

[11]  B Bednarz,et al.  The development, validation and application of a multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanner model for assessing organ doses to the pregnant patient and the fetus using Monte Carlo simulations , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk for pediatric chest CT. , 2011, Radiology.

[14]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  The feasibility of patient size-corrected, scanner-independent organ dose estimates for abdominal CT exams. , 2011, Medical physics.

[15]  Division on Earth.  Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[16]  Donald P Frush,et al.  In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: effects on radiation dose and image quality using experimental and clinical data. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  A method to generate equivalent energy spectra and filtration models based on measurement for multidetector CT Monte Carlo dosimetry simulations. , 2009, Medical physics.

[18]  K. P. Kim,et al.  Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study , 2012, The Lancet.

[19]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography. , 2009, Medical physics.

[20]  J. Sempau,et al.  Experimental benchmarks of the Monte Carlo code penelope , 2003 .

[21]  Aiping Ding,et al.  Extension of RPI-adult male and female computational phantoms to obese patients and a Monte Carlo study of the effect on CT imaging dose , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Division on Earth.  Tracking Radiation Exposure from Medical Diagnostic Procedures: Workshop Reports , 2012 .

[23]  W. Segars,et al.  4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research. , 2010, Medical physics.

[24]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part I. development and validation of a Monte Carlo program. , 2010, Medical physics.

[25]  W P Segars,et al.  Population of anatomically variable 4D XCAT adult phantoms for imaging research and optimization. , 2013, Medical physics.