Predictors of Bacteraemia in Emergency Department Patients with Pneumonia

Objective To determine the proportion of patients investigated in an Australian emergency department (ED) for non-hospital-acquired pneumonia with bacteraemia and to identify risk factors for bacteraemia. Method Retrospective cohort study of patients with an ED diagnosis of non-hospital-acquired pneumonia in whom blood cultures were taken. Data collected included demographics, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), immunosuppression, intravenous (IV) drug use or diabetes, prior antibiotic use, clinical features, biochemistry, haematology and blood culture results, ED disposition and pneumonia severity index (PSI) class. Outcomes of interest were the proportion of blood cultures that identified bacteraemia and identification of independent predictors of bacteraemia. Data analysis was by descriptive statistics, odds ratios (OR) and multivariate analysis. Results Two hundred patients were studied. The bacteraemia rate was 7% (95% CI=4-11%). IV drug use (OR 16.7, 95% CI=2.65-105) and pulse rate (OR 1.29, 95% CI=1.01-1.65, per 10 beat rise) were independently associated with bacteraemia. Overall, 1/199 patients had a significant broadening of therapy based on a blood culture result (0.5%, 95% CI=0.09-2.8%). On post hoc analysis, using PSI class IV/V or known IV drug use as criteria for blood culture ordering had sensitivity 92.9% (95% CI=64.1-99.6%) and negative predictive value 98.9% (95% CI=93.5-99.9%) for bacteraemia. Conclusion 7% of blood cultures from patients with non-hospital acquired pneumonia showed bacteraemia. Using the combination of PSI class IV/V or IV drug use as criteria for blood culture ordering shows promise.

[1]  A. Ma,et al.  Predicting bacteremia in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. , 2004, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[2]  P. Bijur,et al.  Limited usefulness of initial blood cultures in community acquired pneumonia. , 2004, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.

[3]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults , 2007, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[4]  D. Bates,et al.  Do emergency department blood cultures change practice in patients with pneumonia? , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  Margaret A Dudeck,et al.  CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. , 2008, American journal of infection control.

[6]  E. Seow,et al.  Predicting positive blood cultures in patients presenting with pneumonia at an Emergency Department in Singapore. , 2009, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[7]  W. Lim,et al.  BTS Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Adults , 2001, Thorax.

[8]  S. Cavanaugh,et al.  Selective use of blood cultures in emergency department pneumonia patients. , 2007, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  L. Andreu,et al.  A comparative study of bacteremic and non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. , 2008, European journal of internal medicine.

[10]  W. Lim,et al.  BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: update 2009 , 2009, Thorax.

[11]  S. Ishimatsu,et al.  Usefulness of initial blood cultures in patients admitted with pneumonia from an emergency department in Japan , 2009, Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy.

[12]  N. Rathlev,et al.  Blood cultures do not change management in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[13]  T. Marrie,et al.  Utility of blood cultures in the management of adults with community acquired pneumonia discharged from the emergency department , 2003, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.