Investigation into Laboratory Abrasion Test Methods for Pervious Concrete

Portland cement pervious concrete (PCPC) has been increasingly used in concrete pavements during recent years. In addition to strength and permeability, abrasion durability is another important property of PCPC. In this study, three laboratory abrasion test methods were investigated for their potential capability of evaluating the abrasion and raveling resistance of PCPC. The three tests are the Cantabro test, the loaded wheel abrasion test, and the surface abrasion test. To evaluate the three test methods, eight PCPC mixtures containing different sizes of coarse aggregates and additives were tested. The comparison of the three abrasion tests indicates that all three tests were fairly effective in differentiating between the PCPC mixtures. However, the results from the Cantabro test may not reflect the abrasion resistance of the mixtures because the failure of the specimens was caused by impact rather than abrasion. With studded wheels and increased wheel load, the loaded wheel abrasion test exhibited best sensitivity and sufficient repeatability. The surface abrasion test successfully differentiated the control mix from other mixtures, but failed to differentiate between the mixtures containing latex and/or fiber, which may be attributed to the unfavorably low weight loss values from this test.

[1]  T. Naik,et al.  Abrasion resistance of concrete as influenced by inclusion of fly ash , 1994 .

[2]  Paul D Tennis,et al.  Pervious Concrete Pavements , 2004 .

[3]  L A Cooley,et al.  ACCELERATED LABORATORY RUTTING TESTS: EVALUATION OF THE ASPHALT PAVEMENT ANALYZER , 2003 .

[4]  Hao Wu,et al.  Performance comparison of laboratory and field produced pervious concrete mixtures , 2011 .

[5]  R. E. Link,et al.  The Effect of Curing Regime on Pervious Concrete Abrasion Resistance , 2009 .

[6]  Edwin G. Burdette,et al.  Laboratory evaluation of permeability and strength of polymer-modified pervious concrete , 2010 .

[7]  D.D.L. Chung,et al.  Improving the abrasion resistance of mortar by adding latex and carbon fibers , 1997 .

[8]  Hao Wu,et al.  Laboratory Evaluation of Abrasion Resistance of Portland Cement Pervious Concrete , 2011 .

[9]  F E Perez-jimenez,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF POROUS MIXES THROUGH THE USE OF SPECIAL BINDERS , 1990 .

[10]  C. Atiş Carbonation-Porosity-Strength Model for Fly Ash Concrete , 2003 .

[11]  M Shane Buchanan AN EVALUATION OF SELECTED METHODS FOR MEASURING THE BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF COMPACTED HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) MIXES , 2000 .

[12]  Eddie N Johnson,et al.  ASPHALT PAVEMENT ANALYZER (APA) EVALUATION , 2002 .

[13]  M S Buchanan,et al.  LOADED WHEEL TESTERS IN THE UNITED STATES: STATE OF THE PRACTICE , 2000 .

[14]  Felix Perez,et al.  POROUS ASPHALT MIXTURES IN SPAIN , 1990 .

[15]  Jing Yang,et al.  Experimental study on properties of pervious concrete pavement materials , 2003 .

[16]  Gajanan M. Sabnis,et al.  Pervious Concrete for Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[17]  Susan L. Tighe,et al.  Pervious Concrete Pavement , 2009 .

[18]  Donald E. Watson,et al.  Refinement of New-Generation Open-Graded Friction Course Mix Design , 2003 .

[19]  Omkar Deo,et al.  Compressive response of pervious concretes proportioned for desired porosities , 2011 .

[20]  John T Harvey,et al.  Permeability measurement and scan imaging to assess clogging of pervious concrete pavements in parking lots. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.