Social Barriers to Renewable Energy Landscapes*

After many years of slow progress, we find that worldwide environmental, political, and economic pressures are providing greater purchase for the accelerated development of renewable energy. Although many people would consider this quickening pace good news, the transition from conventional resources has encountered public resistance. In this article I examine the nature of challenges to the development of geothermal, wind, and solar energy projects in three places: the United States, Scotland, and Mexico. The common thread in the public reservations about renewable energy is landscape change and the consequent disruption such change produces to established ways of life for those who are nearby. It also suggests the importance of rebalancing the emphasis of renewable energy programs away from the traditional technical focus that dominates development planning. The more suitable and expedient approach would be to consider the challenges of development as predominantly social matters with technical components, rather than the other way around. To accept this view is to unlock the door to a renewable energy future.

[1]  V. Fthenakis,et al.  A solar grand plan. , 2008, Scientific American.

[2]  Alexandra Mallett,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovations: The role of technology cooperation in urban Mexico , 2007 .

[3]  Donna Heimiller,et al.  Wind Energy Resource Atlas of Oaxaca , 2003 .

[4]  L. Winner The Whale and the Reactor , 2020 .

[5]  Kelley Oj Agency for International Development. , 1973 .

[6]  M. Pasqualetti,et al.  Hazardous waste from geothermal energy: a case study , 1988 .

[7]  Martin J. Pasqualetti,et al.  Geothermal energy and the environment: The global experience , 1980 .

[8]  M. Dale Strickland,et al.  Ecological Impacts of Wind Energy Development on Bats: Questions, Research Needs, and Hypotheses , 2007 .

[9]  Martin J. Pasqualetti,et al.  Public reaction to wind development in California , 1987 .

[10]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments; local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England , 2010 .

[11]  David E. Nye,et al.  Consuming Power: A Social History of American Energies , 1997 .

[12]  Martin J. Pasqualetti,et al.  Wind Energy Landscapes: Society and Technology in the California Desert , 2001 .

[13]  Leo Marx The machine in the garden : technology and the pastoral ideal in America , 1965 .

[14]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? , 2008 .

[15]  John F. Bash,et al.  Cape Wind: Money, Celebrity, Class, Politics, and the Battle for Our Energy Future on Nantucket Sound , 2007 .

[16]  Leo Marx,et al.  The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America by Leo Marx (review) , 1965 .

[17]  Martin J. Pasqualetti The Next Generation of Energy Landscapes , 2011 .

[18]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The Myth of the Machine: Technics and Human Development by Lewis Mumford (review) , 1967 .

[19]  Carol M Kelley National Public Radio , 2001 .

[20]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  The Offshore Wind Power Debate: Views from Cape Cod , 2005 .

[21]  L. Mumford The Myth of the Machine , 1967 .

[22]  Lewis Mumford,et al.  Technics and human development , 1967 .

[23]  M. Pasqualetti,et al.  LAND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SOLAR AND COAL OPTIONS , 1984 .

[24]  Martin J. Pasqualetti Living with Wind Power in a Hostile Landscape , 2002 .

[25]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[26]  W. Kempton,et al.  Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors , 2007 .

[27]  Loretta O’Connor,et al.  The land remembers: landscape terms and place names in Lowland Chontal of Oaxaca, Mexico , 2008 .

[28]  Langdon Winner,et al.  The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High , 1986 .

[29]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  The social impact of a large wind turbine , 1988 .

[30]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland , 2010 .

[31]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation , 2007 .

[32]  M. Dale Strickland,et al.  Bat activity, composition, and collision mortality at a large wind plant in Minnesota , 2004 .

[33]  Barry D. Solomon,et al.  Wind Power in View: Energy Landscapes in a Crowded World , 2003 .

[34]  THE CERRO PRIETO GEOTHERMAL FIELD, MEXICO , 2007 .

[35]  Hermann-Dieter Schröder,et al.  BBC — British Broadcasting Corporation , 2006 .

[36]  A. Kolokontes,et al.  THE JOURNAL OF ENERGY AND DEVELOPMENT , 2010 .

[37]  Olivier Coutard,et al.  The Governance of Large Technical Systems , 1999 .

[38]  Robert L. Thayer,et al.  Gray World, Green Heart: Technology, Nature, and the Sustainable Landscape , 1993 .