Comparison of the Dislocation Density in Martensitic Steels Evaluated by Some X-ray Diffraction Methods

X-ray diffraction (XRD)-based modified Warren–Averbach (MWA) analysis, in comparison with the Williamson–Hall (WH) analysis, was applied to 0.3 mass% carbon martensitic steels, as-quenched and subsequently tempered at various temperatures, to give their dislocation densities. For the as-quenched martensite, the WH method gives a value of around 2.0×1016 m−2, which could be overestimated. Meanwhile, the MWA method gives a value of around 6.3×1015 m−2, which is below the possible upper limit of dislocation density, 1016 m−2. The MWA-derived value for the as-quenched steel seems to be 1.6–4.8 times higher than those expected from the precedent results derived by transmission electron microscope (TEM) observations. However, considering that the TEM-derived value gives the microscopically local average while the XRD-derived value gives the macroscopic average, such discrepancy between the TEM-derived value and MWA-derived value is tolerable. For the steels tempered at 723 K and 923 K, the MWA and WH methods give comparable values ranging in 1014 m−2, where the rearrangement of dislocation structure is observed by TEM. However, in these steels where the XRD peaks are narrower and the instrumental width of the present XRD system could be significant, care should be taken over the peak width correction.

[1]  B. Warren,et al.  The Effect of Cold‐Work Distortion on X‐Ray Patterns , 1950 .

[2]  B. Warren,et al.  The Separation of Cold‐Work Distortion and Particle Size Broadening in X‐Ray Patterns , 1952 .

[3]  R. Smoluchowski,et al.  Elements of X‐Ray Diffraction , 1957 .

[4]  A. Howie,et al.  Electron Microscopy of Thin Crystals , 1977, Nature.

[5]  L. F. Porter,et al.  Hardness of tempered martensite in carbon and low-alloy steels , 1977 .

[6]  Tamás Ungár,et al.  The effect of dislocation contrast on x‐ray line broadening: A new approach to line profile analysis , 1996 .

[7]  A. Borbely,et al.  The contrast factors of dislocations in cubic crystals: the dislocation model of strain anisotropy in practice , 1999 .

[8]  G. Krauss Martensite in steel: strength and structure , 1999 .

[9]  P. Scardi,et al.  Effect of a crystallite size distribution on X‐ray diffraction line profiles and whole‐powder‐pattern fitting , 2000 .

[10]  Shigekazu Morito,et al.  Dislocation density within lath martensite in Fe-C and Fe-Ni alloys , 2003 .

[11]  Gunther Eggeler,et al.  The evolution of dislocation density during heat treatment and creep of tempered martensite ferritic steels , 2003 .

[12]  T. Ida,et al.  Diffraction peak profiles from spherical crystallites with lognormal size distribution , 2003 .

[13]  G. Krauss Steels: Processing, Structure, And Performance , 2005 .

[14]  T. Koyama,et al.  Estimation of the System Free Energy of Martensite Phase in an Fe-Cr-C Ternary Alloy , 2005 .

[15]  R. Kužel Kinematical diffraction by distorted crystals – dislocation X-ray line broadening , 2007 .

[16]  T. Tsuchiyama,et al.  Yielding behavior and change in dislocation substructure in an UltraLow carbon martensitic steel , 2007 .