Creation of artificial protein–protein interactions using α-helices as interfaces

Designing novel protein–protein interactions (PPIs) with high affinity is a challenging task. Directed evolution, a combination of randomization of the gene for the protein of interest and selection using a display technique, is one of the most powerful tools for producing a protein binder. However, the selected proteins often bind to the target protein at an undesired surface. More problematically, some selected proteins bind to their targets even though they are unfolded. Current state-of-the-art computational design methods have successfully created novel protein binders. These computational methods have optimized the non-covalent interactions at interfaces and thus produced artificial protein complexes. However, to date there are only a limited number of successful examples of computationally designed de novo PPIs. De novo design of coiled-coil proteins has been extensively performed and, therefore, a large amount of knowledge of the sequence–structure relationship of coiled-coil proteins has been accumulated. Taking advantage of this knowledge, de novo design of inter-helical interactions has been used to produce artificial PPIs. Here, we review recent progress in the in silico design and rational design of de novo PPIs and the use of α-helices as interfaces.

[1]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational Design of Self-Assembling Protein Nanomaterials with Atomic Level Accuracy , 2012, Science.

[2]  David Baker,et al.  A Computationally Designed Inhibitor of an Epstein-Barr Viral Bcl-2 Protein Induces Apoptosis in Infected Cells , 2014, Cell.

[3]  D. Baker,et al.  Computation-Guided Backbone Grafting of a Discontinuous Motif onto a Protein Scaffold , 2011, Science.

[4]  M. Hecht,et al.  Self-Assembling Nano-Architectures Created from a Protein Nano-Building Block Using an Intermolecularly Folded Dimeric de Novo Protein. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  I. Meier,et al.  Coiled-coil protein composition of 22 proteomes – differences and common themes in subcellular infrastructure and traffic control , 2005, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[6]  David Baker,et al.  Computational design of trimeric influenza neutralizing proteins targeting the hemagglutinin receptor binding site , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  David Baker,et al.  Computational design of a homotrimeric metalloprotein with a trisbipyridyl core , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  S. Akanuma,et al.  De novo design of protein-protein interactions through modification of inter-molecular helix-helix interface residues. , 2016, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[9]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  Design of structurally distinct proteins using strategies inspired by evolution , 2016, Science.

[10]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Computational design of a symmetric homodimer using β-strand assembly , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  David Baker,et al.  Rational design of alpha-helical tandem repeat proteins with closed architectures , 2015, Nature.

[12]  Ryoichi Arai,et al.  Domain-swapped dimeric structure of a stable and functional de novo four-helix bundle protein, WA20. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[13]  J. H. Pereira,et al.  Computational Design of Self-Assembling Cyclic Protein Homo-oligomers , 2016, Nature chemistry.

[14]  Timothy A. Whitehead,et al.  Optimization of affinity, specificity and function of designed influenza inhibitors using deep sequencing , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  Thomas Szyperski,et al.  Computational design of a PAK1 binding protein. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  D. Hilvert,et al.  Affinity maturation of a computationally designed binding protein affords a functional but disordered polypeptide. , 2014, Journal of structural biology.

[17]  Jiye Shi,et al.  Computational design of an epitope-specific Keap1 binding antibody using hotspot residues grafting and CDR loop swapping , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Derek N Woolfson,et al.  CCBuilder 2.0: Powerful and accessible coiled‐coil modeling , 2017, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  Robert A. Langan,et al.  De novo design of protein homo-oligomers with modular hydrogen-bond network–mediated specificity , 2016, Science.

[20]  Teruyuki Nagamune,et al.  Design of the linkers which effectively separate domains of a bifunctional fusion protein. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[21]  Bryan S. Der,et al.  Metal-mediated affinity and orientation specificity in a computationally designed protein homodimer. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  P Argos,et al.  An investigation of oligopeptides linking domains in protein tertiary structures and possible candidates for general gene fusion. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  David Baker,et al.  Accurate design of megadalton-scale two-component icosahedral protein complexes , 2016, Science.

[24]  Jaap Heringa,et al.  An analysis of protein domain linkers: their classification and role in protein folding. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[25]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational Design of High-Affinity Epitope Scaffolds by Backbone Grafting of a Linear Epitope , 2011, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[26]  D. Baker,et al.  High thermodynamic stability of parametrically designed helical bundles , 2014, Science.

[27]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Metal templated design of protein interfaces , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  P. Charbonneau,et al.  The Physics of Protein Self-Assembly , 2016, 1602.00884.

[30]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Rational design of TNFα binding proteins based on the de novo designed protein DS119 , 2016, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[31]  Mainak Guharoy,et al.  Secondary structure based analysis and classification of biological interfaces: identification of binding motifs in protein-protein interactions , 2007, Bioinform..

[32]  Richard B. Sessions,et al.  CCBuilder: an interactive web-based tool for building, designing and assessing coiled-coil protein assemblies , 2014, Bioinform..

[33]  David Baker,et al.  Design of a hyperstable 60-subunit protein icosahedron , 2016, Nature.

[34]  William R Schief,et al.  Computational design of protein antigens that interact with the CDR H3 loop of HIV broadly neutralizing antibody 2F5 , 2014, Proteins.

[35]  N. Linden,et al.  Self-Assembling Cages from Coiled-Coil Peptide Modules , 2013, Science.

[36]  Chin-Lin Guo,et al.  Computational design of co-assembling protein–DNA nanowires , 2015, Nature.

[37]  D Baker,et al.  Structural plasticity of helical nanotubes based on coiled-coil assemblies. , 2015, Structure.

[38]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Design of a single-chain polypeptide tetrahedron assembled from coiled-coil segments , 2013, Nature chemical biology.

[39]  L. Serpell,et al.  Modular Design of Self-Assembling Peptide-Based Nanotubes. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[40]  Gevorg Grigoryan,et al.  Probing designability via a generalized model of helical bundle geometry. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  Richard Bonneau,et al.  Engineered coiled-coil protein microfibers. , 2014, Biomacromolecules.

[42]  M. Holl,et al.  Evaluation of a symmetry-based strategy for assembling protein complexes. , 2011, RSC advances.

[43]  Derek N Woolfson,et al.  Coiled-Coil Design: Updated and Upgraded. , 2017, Sub-cellular biochemistry.

[44]  Timothy A. Whitehead,et al.  Computational Design of Proteins Targeting the Conserved Stem Region of Influenza Hemagglutinin , 2011, Science.

[45]  David Baker,et al.  A de novo protein binding pair by computational design and directed evolution. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[46]  Stephen L Mayo,et al.  A de novo designed protein–protein interface , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[47]  G. Skiniotis,et al.  Flexible, symmetry-directed approach to assembling protein cages , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Stephen L Mayo,et al.  Computational design and experimental verification of a symmetric protein homodimer , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of ordered two-dimensional arrays mediated by noncovalent protein-protein interfaces , 2015, Science.

[50]  Derek N. Woolfson,et al.  Sticky-end assembly of a designed peptide fiber provides insight into protein fibrillogenesis. , 2000 .

[51]  Chunfu Xu,et al.  Rational design of helical nanotubes from self-assembly of coiled-coil lock washers. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[52]  J. Chin,et al.  Design and Evolution of a Miniature Bcl-2 Binding Protein. , 2001, Angewandte Chemie.

[53]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[54]  David Baker,et al.  Accurate design of co-assembling multi-component protein nanomaterials , 2014, Nature.

[55]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Massively parallel de novo protein design for targeted therapeutics , 2017, Nature.

[56]  Jens Meiler,et al.  ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[57]  G. Skiniotis,et al.  Characterization of a highly flexible self‐assembling protein system designed to form nanocages , 2014, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[58]  A. Schepartz,et al.  Paralog-selective ligands for bcl-2 proteins. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[59]  Richard B. Sessions,et al.  Computational design of water-soluble α-helical barrels , 2014, Science.

[60]  György Abrusán,et al.  Alpha Helices Are More Robust to Mutations than Beta Strands , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[61]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational design of a protein-based enzyme inhibitor. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[62]  Owen J. L. Rackham,et al.  The evolution and structure prediction of coiled coils across all genomes , 2010 .

[63]  David Baker,et al.  Exploring the repeat protein universe through computational protein design , 2015, Nature.

[64]  F. Crick,et al.  The packing of α‐helices: simple coiled‐coils , 1953 .

[65]  D. Hilvert,et al.  Protein design by directed evolution. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.

[66]  X. Xing,et al.  Construction of a linker library with widely controllable flexibility for fusion protein design , 2015, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[67]  B. Rost,et al.  Comparing function and structure between entire proteomes , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.