Improving the understanding of circular economy potential at territorial level using systems thinking

Abstract The definition of Circular Economy (CE) has evolved over time. It includes intervention options for reducing consumption, improving the efficiency of production, introducing recycling and reuse for materials management, including new business models geared at waste prevention. With the use of Systems Thinking and the creation of Causal Loop Diagrams (CLDs) we explore how CE strategies are related to territorial dynamics and how the outcomes of such strategies can support sustainable development. We first reviewed the literature, to identify the main drivers of change (i.e. feedback loops) triggered by CE interventions. We then applied the same systemic approach to six case studies across Europe in synergy with ESPON CIRCTER project. This allowed us to review, validate and improve the general systemic approach and further explore the role that specific territorial characteristics can play in the identification, selection and effective implementation of CE interventions. We find that some of the feedback loops emerged from the case studies are not found in the literature. On the one hand, new balancing loops have emerged, representing localized challenges to the implementation of CE strategies. On the other hand, new dynamics related to behavioural change have also emerged, which lead to self-reinforcing mechanisms in the case studies analysed, creating a stronger will for the implementation of CE interventions. The main result of our research is comprehensive CLD that can be used to assess and compare different CE strategies, fully considering the complexity of the CE and its various outcomes across social, economic and environmental indicators.

[1]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[2]  David Hunkeler,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Costing , 2008 .

[3]  Shinichiro Nakamura,et al.  Toward an integrated model of the circular economy: Dynamic waste input–output , 2018, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[4]  Fiona Charnley,et al.  Opportunities for redistributed manufacturing and digital intelligence as enablers of a circular economy , 2018, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering.

[5]  P. Vrat,et al.  Circular economy model of gold recovery from cell phones using system dynamics approach: a case study of India , 2018, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[6]  Gilbert Probst,et al.  Tackling Complexity: A Systemic Approach for Decision Makers , 2014 .

[7]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Optimizing Circular Economy Planning and Risk Analysis Using System Dynamics , 2009 .

[8]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Circular Economy: Measuring Innovation in the Product Chain , 2017 .

[9]  Julien Bert,et al.  What's Ahead for Car Sharing?: The New Mobility and Its Impact on Vehicle Sales , 2016 .

[10]  J. Korhonen,et al.  Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations , 2018 .

[11]  Raimund Bleischwitz,et al.  Towards a circular economy: insights based on the development of the global ENGAGE-materials model and evidence for the iron and steel industry , 2017, International Economics and Economic Policy.

[12]  M. Grubb Communication Energy efficiency and economic fallacies , 1990 .

[13]  Cheng-kang Gao,et al.  Pathways towards regional circular economy evaluated using material flow analysis and system dynamics , 2020 .

[14]  Alfonso Aranda-Usón,et al.  Definition and measurement of the circular economy’s regional impact , 2019, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.

[15]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Assessing circularity interventions: a review of EEIOA-based studies , 2018, Journal of Economic Structures.

[16]  T. Astrup,et al.  Evaluation of Externality Costs in Life-Cycle Optimization of Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Seyoum Eshetu Birkie,et al.  Circular economy as an essentially contested concept , 2018 .

[18]  Joseph Fiksel,et al.  T21-Ohio, a System Dynamics Approach to Policy Assessment for Sustainable Development: A Waste to Profit Case Study , 2010 .

[19]  D Costa,et al.  A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Mark Meyer,et al.  Pathways to a Resource-Efficient and Low-Carbon Europe , 2017, Ecological Economics.

[21]  J. Marin,et al.  Interpreting Circularity. Circular City Representations Concealing Transition Drivers , 2018 .

[22]  J. Polimeni,et al.  Jevons’ Paradox and the myth of technological liberation , 2006 .

[23]  Vasileios Rizos,et al.  The Circular Economy: A review of definitions, processes and impacts. CEPS Research Report No 2017/8, April 2017 , 2017 .

[24]  K. Hobson ‘Small stories of closing loops’: social circularity and the everyday circular economy , 2019, Climatic Change.

[25]  Leonardo Rosado,et al.  Circular economy – From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools , 2017, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[26]  K. Winans,et al.  The history and current applications of the circular economy concept , 2017 .

[27]  Shulin Li,et al.  The Research on Quantitative Evaluation of Circular Economy Based on Waste Input-Output Analysis , 2012 .

[28]  M. Bianchi,et al.  Monitoring domestic material consumption at lower territorial levels: A novel data downscaling method , 2020, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[29]  Michael Lieder,et al.  Towards circular economy implementation in manufacturing systems using a multi-method simulation approach to link design and business strategy , 2017 .

[30]  Ruben Bibas,et al.  The Macroeconomics of the Circular Economy Transition: A Critical Review of Modelling Approaches , 2018 .

[31]  Un Environment Inclusive Green EconomyResources,et al.  Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, Conclusion , 2017 .