The spatial organization and microbial community structure of an epilithic biofilm.

Microbial biofilms are common on lithic surfaces, including stone buildings. However, the ecology of these communities is poorly understood. Few studies have focused on the spatial characteristics of lithobiontic biofilms, despite the fact that spatial structure has been demonstrated to influence ecosystem function (and hence biodegradation) and community diversity. Furthermore, relatively few studies have utilized molecular techniques to characterize these communities, even though molecular methods have revealed unexpected microbial diversity in other habitats. This study investigated (1) the spatial structure and (2) the taxonomic composition of an epilithic biofilm using molecular techniques, namely amplicon pyrosequencing and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. Dispersion indices and Mantel correlograms were used to test for the presence of spatial structure in the biofilm. Diversity metrics and rank-abundance distributions (RADs) were also generated. The study revealed spatial structure on a centimetre scale in eukaryotic microbes (fungi and algae), but not the bacteria. Fungal and bacterial communities were highly diverse; algal communities much less so. The RADs were characterized by a distinctive 'hollow' (concave up) profile and long tails of rare taxa. These findings have implications for understanding the ecology of epilithic biofilms and the spatial heterogeneity of stone biodeterioration.

[1]  M. Guiry,et al.  Composition and spatial variability of terrestrial algal assemblages occurring at the bases of urban walls in Europe , 2004 .

[2]  B. Langbein,et al.  Long-Term Changes , 2016 .

[3]  Heather Viles,et al.  Eukaryotic Microorganisms and Stone Biodeterioration , 2010 .

[4]  H. Viles,et al.  Non-destructive sampling of rock-dwelling microbial communities using sterile adhesive tape. , 2012, Journal of microbiological methods.

[5]  D. John Algal growths on buildings: a general review and methods of treatment , 1988 .

[6]  J. Tiedje,et al.  Naïve Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[7]  H. Viles,et al.  The characterisation of eukaryotic microbial communities on sandstone buildings in Belfast, UK, using TRFLP and 454 pyrosequencing , 2013 .

[8]  Mutsunori Tokeshi,et al.  Species Abundance Patterns and Community Structure , 1993 .

[9]  C. Quince,et al.  Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data , 2009, Nature Methods.

[10]  K. Walsh,et al.  Using ecological diversity measures with bacterial communities. , 2003, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[11]  C. Pedrós-Alió,et al.  Spatial patterns of bacterial richness and evenness in the NW Mediterranean Sea explored by pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA , 2010 .

[12]  Andy F. S. Taylor,et al.  The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi--recent updates and future perspectives. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[13]  T. Bailey Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists , 2006 .

[14]  A. Gorbushina Life on the rocks. , 2007, Environmental microbiology.

[15]  M. Fortin,et al.  Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists 1st edition , 2005 .

[16]  Jason D. Gans,et al.  Computational Improvements Reveal Great Bacterial Diversity and High Metal Toxicity in Soil , 2005, Science.

[17]  J. Franklin Spatial Pattern and Ecosystem Function: Reflections on Current Knowledge and Future Directions , 2005 .

[18]  Rob Knight,et al.  UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection , 2011, Bioinform..

[19]  Lawrence O. Ticknor,et al.  Empirical and Theoretical Bacterial Diversity in Four Arizona Soils , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  P. Legendre,et al.  vegan : Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-5 , 2007 .

[21]  E. Gaidos,et al.  Ribosomal tag pyrosequencing of DNA and RNA from benthic coral reef microbiota: community spatial structure, rare members and nitrogen-cycling guilds. , 2011, Environmental microbiology.

[22]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  PlutoF—a Web Based Workbench for Ecological and Taxonomic Research, with an Online Implementation for Fungal ITS Sequences , 2010, Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online.

[23]  G. Gadd,et al.  Fungal involvement in bioweathering and biotransformation of rocks and minerals , 2003, Mineralogical Magazine.

[24]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[25]  C. Gaylarde,et al.  Microbial deterioration of stone monuments--an updated overview. , 2009, Advances in applied microbiology.

[26]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  An open source software package for automated extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from fungal ITS sequences for use in high-throughput community assays and molecular ecology , 2010 .

[27]  L. Tedersoo,et al.  454 Pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing of tropical mycorrhizal fungi provide similar results but reveal substantial methodological biases. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[28]  D. Gleeson,et al.  Characterization of Fungal Community Structure on a Weathered Pegmatitic Granite , 2005, Microbial Ecology.

[29]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance , 1987, Vegetatio.

[30]  J. Braams,et al.  Biodeterioration of stone: a review , 2000 .

[31]  D. Buckley,et al.  Evidence from GC-TRFLP that Bacterial Communities in Soil Are Lognormally Distributed , 2008, PloS one.

[32]  Heather A Viles,et al.  Algal 'greening' and the conservation of stone heritage structures. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  D. Chaput,et al.  Long-term changes in soil microbial communities during primary succession , 2014 .

[34]  Eric E. Roden,et al.  SUCCESSIONAL CHANGES IN BACTERIAL ASSEMBLAGE STRUCTURE DURING EPILITHIC BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT , 2001 .

[35]  J. Crawford,et al.  Bacterial Interactions At The Microscale – Linking Habitat To Function In Soil , 2007 .

[36]  Martin Hartmann,et al.  Introducing mothur: Open-Source, Platform-Independent, Community-Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[37]  M. Guiry,et al.  Composition and distribution of subaerial algal assemblages in Galway City, western Ireland , 2003 .

[38]  A New Framework to Accurately Quantify Soil Bacterial Community Diversity from DGGE , 2013, Microbial Ecology.

[39]  F. Rindi Diversity, Distribution and Ecology of Green Algae and Cyanobacteria in Urban Habitats , 2007 .

[40]  N. Mantel The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.

[41]  Pelin Yilmaz,et al.  The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  Christine C. Gaylarde,et al.  A comparative study of the major microbial biomass of biofilms on exteriors of buildings in Europe and Latin America , 2005 .

[43]  N. Pace A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. , 1997, Science.

[44]  W. Al-Soud,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Bacterial Communities in a Potato Field as Determined by Pyrosequencing , 2011, PloS one.

[45]  James H. Brown,et al.  Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[46]  D. Gleeson,et al.  Molecular Characterization of Fungal Communities in Sandstone , 2010 .

[47]  R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses , 2009, The ISME Journal.

[48]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Microbial deterioration of historic stone , 2005 .

[49]  S. Dowd,et al.  Tag-encoded pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in a single soil type as affected by management and land use , 2008 .

[50]  J. Lorenzo,et al.  ALGAE AND BACTERIA ON HISTORIC MONUMENTS AT ALCALA DE HENARES, SPAIN , 1997 .