Effect of lead rubber bearing characteristics on the response of seismic-isolated bridges

A parametric study is conducted to investigate the effect of lead rubber bearing (LRB) isolator and ground motion characteristics on the response of seismic isolated bridges. The purpose was to investigate the most favorable parameters of the LRB for minimum earthquake response of the isolated bridge system for different ground motions. The important parameters included are: ground motion characteristic by considering peak ground acceleration to peak ground velocity, PGA/PGV ratio as damage index; characteristic strength, Qd of the LRB isolator normalized by the weight acting on the isolator; flexibility of isolator by varying post yield time period, Td; and yield stiffness to post yield stiffness, Ku/Kd ratio. The performance of seismic isolated bridge is measured by the variation of maximum isolator displacement (MID), maximum isolator force (MIF), deck acceleration and pier base shear. For a specified ground motion, smaller MID and MIF are regarded as indicator of better seismic performance. It is found that there exists a particular value of Qd/W, Td and Ku/Kd for which the MID, MIF, deck acceleration and pier base shear attain the minimum values. Finally the recommendations are made which are useful for the design engineers at the preliminary seismic isolation design of the bridges with LRB isolator for the ground motion having different characteristics.

[1]  Jiahao Lin,et al.  An Introduction to Seismic Isolation , 1993 .

[2]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Aseismic base isolation: review and bibliography , 1986 .

[3]  W. K. Tso,et al.  Effect of Peak Ground a/v Ratio on Structural Damage , 1988 .

[4]  A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  MODELING OF RUBBER AND LEAD PASSIVE-CONTROL BEARINGS FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS , 1995 .

[5]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Experimental study of lead and elastomeric dampers for base isolation systems , 1981 .

[6]  Massimo Fragiacomo,et al.  Design of bilinear hysteretic isolation systems , 2003 .

[7]  Kyu-Sik Park,et al.  A comparative study on aseismic performances of base isolation systems for multi-span continuous bridge , 2002 .

[8]  A. C. Heidebrecht,et al.  Evaluation of the seismic response factor introduced in the 1985 edition of the National Building Code of Canada , 1988 .

[9]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Seismic behavior of isolated bridges: A-state-of-the-art review , 2003 .

[10]  R. S. Jangid.  Optimum lead–rubber isolation bearings for near-fault motions , 2007 .

[11]  Soon-Taek Oh,et al.  Experimental and analytical investigation of a seismically isolated bridge model with friction pendulum system , 1998 .

[12]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Design of seismic isolated structures : from theory to practice , 1999 .

[13]  Ronald L. Mayes,et al.  Seismic Isolation: History, Application, and Performance—A World View , 1990 .

[14]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Performance estimates in seismically isolated bridge structures , 2004 .

[15]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[16]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  An energy approach to sliding of single-span simply supported slab-on-girder steel highway bridges with damaged bearings , 1995 .

[17]  Hisanori Otsuka,et al.  Optimal yield level of bilinear seismic isolation devices , 1999 .

[18]  Jerome J. Connor,et al.  Introduction to Structural Motion Control , 2002 .