Persketchtivity: An Intelligent Pen-Based Online Education Platform for Sketching Instruction

Design sketching is an important and versatile skill for engineering students to master. Through it, students translate their design thoughts effectively onto a visual medium, whether to produce hand-drawn sketches onto paper, seamlessly interact with intelligent sketch-based modeling interfaces, or reap the advantages of educational benefits associated with drawing in general. Traditional instructional approaches for teaching design sketching are frequently constrained by the availability of experienced human instructors or the lack of supervised learning from self-practice, while relevant intelligent educational applications for sketch instruction have focused more on assessing users' art drawings or cognitive developmental progress. In this paper, we introduce an intelligent pen-based computing educational application that not only teaches engineering students how to hone and practice their design sketching skills through stylus-and-touchscreen interaction, but also aide their motivation and self-regulated learning through real-time feedback.

[1]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis , 1997 .

[2]  Dillon K. Inouye,et al.  Learned helplessness through modeling: The role of perceived similarity in competence. , 1978 .

[3]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[4]  Linda C. Schmidt,et al.  Analysis of Capstone Design Reports: Visual Representations , 2011 .

[5]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  “Collaborating To Success”: An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques , 2005 .

[6]  V. Goel Sketches of thought , 1995 .

[7]  Erin M. McTigue,et al.  Academic Resilience and Reading: Building Successful Readers , 2009 .

[8]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  The Development and Effects of Teaching Perspective Free-Hand Sketching in Engineering Design , 2016 .

[9]  Thomas Strothotte,et al.  Assessing the effect of non-photorealistic rendered images in CAD , 1996, CHI '96.

[10]  Paul Riley Collaborating for success , 2004 .

[11]  Richard S. Mansfield,et al.  The Effectiveness of Creativity Training , 1978 .

[12]  John S. Gero,et al.  Sketching as mental imagery processing , 2001 .

[13]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods , 2011 .

[14]  Ashley Lynn Grenier Conceptual understanding and the use of hand-sketching in mechanical engineering design , 2008 .

[15]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture , 1994 .

[16]  Julie Linsey,et al.  Representing analogies to influence fixation and creativity: A study comparing computer-aided design, photographs, and sketches , 2015, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[17]  David Craig,et al.  The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process , 1990, Comput. Graph..

[18]  T. Purcell,et al.  Mental synthesis and creativity in design: an experimental examination , 2000 .

[19]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Can We Teach Children To Think Creatively , 1972 .

[20]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Measuring Engineering Design Self‐Efficacy , 2010 .

[21]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[22]  Noe Vargas Hernandez,et al.  Research on encouraging sketching in engineering design , 2012, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[23]  Hsen-Hsing Ma A Synthetic Analysis of the Effectiveness of Single Components and Packages in Creativity Training Programs , 2006 .

[24]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Sketch interpretation in design communication , 1999 .

[25]  Shawn Glynn Drawing Mental Models. , 1997 .

[26]  John S. Gero,et al.  The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers , 2002 .

[27]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[28]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings , 1996 .

[30]  Gloria Kauffman,et al.  "I just need to draw": Responding to literature across multiple sign systems , 2000 .

[31]  Lilia Halim,et al.  CAMED: An Innovative Communication Tool in Teaching Engineering Drawing , 2012 .

[32]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How designers perceive sketches , 2006 .

[33]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education , 1999 .

[34]  Manuel Contero,et al.  Computer-aided sketching as a tool to promote innovation in the new product development process , 2009, Comput. Ind..

[35]  John Merrill,et al.  Assessing General Creativity and Creative Engineering Design in First Year Engineering Students , 2009 .

[36]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Increasing Innovation: A Trilogy of Experiments Towards a Design-by-Analogy Method , 2007 .