Hypermedia Navigation Profiles: Cognitive Characteristics and Information Processing Strategies

This study provides insights about how learning with hypermedia is mediated by system design and learner cognition. Videotaped observations were made of seventh and eleventh grade students using a commercially produced instructional hypermedia system. Analysis revealed differences among students in the paths taken, the type of nodes visited, the amount of time spent at each node, and think-aloud verbalizations. Three profiles of hypermedia navigation emerged from the data with each style characterized by a distinct set of information processing strategies. Analysis of the characteristics of the learners revealed that the students within each profile group had similar levels of prior knowledge, need for cognition, and self-efficacy. Student-generated concept maps appeared to be influenced by both the organization of knowledge within the system and navigation performance. Implications related to the design and use of hypermedia systems are considered.

[1]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[2]  Lynne Anderson-Inman.  Hypertext Literacy: Observations from the ElectroText Project. , 1994 .

[3]  J L Drolet,et al.  Transcending death during early adulthood: symbolic immortality, death anxiety, and purpose in life. , 1990, Journal of clinical psychology.

[4]  Susan H. Gray,et al.  The Effect of Locus of Control and Sequence Control on Computerized Information Retrieval and Retention , 1989 .

[5]  Annette Simpson.  Lost in hyperspace: How can designers help? , 1990, Intell. Tutoring Media.

[6]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Hypermedia and learning: freedom and chaos , 1988 .

[7]  M. Hannafin,et al.  Cognitive strategies and learning from the world wide web , 1997 .

[8]  James H. Wandersee,et al.  Concept Mapping and the Cartography of Cognition. , 1990 .

[9]  J. Novak.  Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education , 1990 .

[10]  E. R. Steinberg.  Cognition and learner control: a literature review, 1977–1988 , 1989 .

[11]  R. Kozma.  Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate , 1994 .

[12]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Hypermedia and instruction: where is the match? , 1990 .

[13]  E. Mandinach,et al.  The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation , 1983 .

[14]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[15]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Patterns of understanding with open-ended learning environments: A qualitative study , 1997 .

[16]  Patricia Carlson.  Square Books and Round Books: Cognitive Implications of Hypertext , 1990 .

[17]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[18]  Graham Storrs,et al.  Characterizing user navigation through complex data structures , 1985 .

[19]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Designing structured hypertext and structuring access to hypertext , 1988 .

[20]  Deborah J. Trumbull.  Students’ Actual and Perceived Use of Navigational and Guidance Tools in a Hypermedia Program , 1992 .

[21]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Progress in application of learning theory , 1980 .

[22]  J. H. McMillan.  Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research , 2001 .

[23]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Mental models: A research focus for interactive learning systems , 1992 .

[24]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[25]  S. Nowicki,et al.  A locus of control scale for children. , 1973 .

[26]  J. Mintzes,et al.  The concept map as a research tool: Exploring conceptual change in biology , 1990 .

[27]  R. Tennyson.  Instructional control strategies and content structure as design variables in concept acquisition using computer-based instruction. , 1980 .

[28]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Hypermedia navigation: Profiles of hypermedia users , 1997 .