Identification of appropriate responsibilities and positions for business process management success: Seeking a valid and reliable framework

Purpose – Identifying appropriate responsibilities and positions needed for successful business process management (BPM) initiatives has become a challenge. Past research efforts have been based on homogenous small samples. The purpose of this paper is to validate a BPM position and responsibility framework among a larger BPM community, by measuring the framework's validity, reliability, and level of agreement among BPM professionals.Design/methodology/approach – A survey of 111 BPM practitioners (19 percent outside of the USA), representing 98 different organizations (primarily in business services, manufacturing, public administration, and finance), was conducted to measure the construct validity and reliability of an existing BPM position and responsibility framework.Findings – The results indicate that the BPM responsibilities possess adequate reliability, and that the framework demonstrates excellent convergent and discriminant validity. BPM professionals indicated significant agreement with the four...

[1]  S. Haynes,et al.  Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. , 1995 .

[2]  William McKinley,et al.  Some Unanticipated Consequences of Organizational Restructuring , 2000 .

[3]  Robert J. Bonometti,et al.  A dynamic technique for conducting online survey‐based research , 2006 .

[4]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits , 1986 .

[5]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  Content Validity of Measures of Abstract Constructs in Management and Organizational Research , 2008 .

[6]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[7]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign , 2011 .

[8]  Rosann Webb Collins,et al.  Technology Requirements and Work Group Communication for Telecommuters , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Moving Beyond Intentions and Toward the Theory of Trying: Effects of Work Environment and Gender on Post-Adoption Information Technology Use , 2005, MIS Q..

[10]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[11]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Managing Human Resources , 1989 .

[12]  Bruce L. Bowerman,et al.  Business Statistics in Practice , 2001 .

[13]  M. Hammer The process audit. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[14]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[15]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  Current Practices in Data Warehousing , 2001, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[16]  E. Martinez Successful Reengineering Demands IS/Business Partnerships , 1995 .

[17]  Akhil Kumar,et al.  Dynamic Work Distribution in Workflow Management Systems: How to Balance Quality and Performance , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Mark P. McDonald,et al.  The Enterprise Capability Organization: A Future for IT , 2007, MIS Q. Executive.

[19]  Ananda Mitra,et al.  Differences in Rate of Response to Web-Based Surveys Among College Students , 2008 .

[20]  Christopher J. Prom Business Process Management (BPM): The Third Wave , 2003 .

[21]  Heitor Mansur Caulliraux,et al.  Process management tasks: a conceptual and practical view , 2008, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[22]  Hamid Reza Ahadi,et al.  An Examination of the Role of Organizational Enablers in Business Process Reengineering and the Impact of Information Technology , 2004, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[23]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success , 2001, MIS Q..

[24]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[25]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[26]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Rigor vs. relevance revisited: response to Benbasat and Zmud , 1999 .

[27]  J. Balogun,et al.  Organizational Restructuring and Middle Manager Sensemaking , 2004 .

[28]  O. Khalil Implications for the Role of Information Systems in a Business Process Reengineering Environment , 1997 .

[29]  Roger Maull,et al.  Understanding Business Process Management: Implications for Theory and Practice , 2009 .

[30]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  The History of Texaco's Corporate Information Technology Function: A General Systems Theoretical Interpretation , 2005, MIS Q..

[31]  Janelle B. Hill,et al.  Gartner's Position on Business Process Management, 2006 , 2006 .

[32]  Lotte S. Luscher,et al.  Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox , 2008 .

[33]  Frederick Winslow Taylor,et al.  科学管理原理=The principles of scientific management , 2014 .

[34]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[35]  T. Davenport Need radical innovation and continuous improvement? Integrate process reengineering and TQM , 1993 .