Response Surface Methodology Approach to Defining Ultrafiltration of Steepwater from Corn Starch Industry

In this work the concentration of steepwater from corn starch industry is monitored using ultrafiltration membrane. The aim was to examine the conditions of ultrafiltration of steepwater by applying the membrane of 2.5nm. The parameters that vary during the course of ultrafiltration, were the transmembrane pressure, flow rate, while the permeate flux and the dry matter content of permeate and retentate were the dependent parameter constantly monitored during the process. Experiments of ultrafiltration are conducted on the samples of steepwater, which were obtained from the starch wet milling plant „Jabuka“ Pancevo. The procedure of ultrafiltration on a single-channel 250mm lenght, with inner diameter of 6.8mm and outer diameter of 10mm membrane were carried on. The membrane is made of α-Al2O3 with TiO2 layer obtained from GEA (Germany). The experiments are carried out at a flow rate ranging from 100 to 200lh and transmembrane pressure of 1-3 bars. During the experiments of steepwater ultrafiltration, the change of permeate flux, dry matter content of permeate and retentate, as well as the absorbance changes of the permeate and retentate were monitored. The experimental results showed that the maximum flux reaches about 40lmh. For responses obtained after experiments, a polynomial model of the second degree is established to evaluate and quantify the influence of the variables. The quadratic equitation fits with the experimental values, where the coefficient of determination for flux is 0.96. The dry matter content of the retentate is increased for about 6%, while the dry matter content of permeate was reduced for about 35-40%, respectively. During steepwater ultrafiltration in permeate stays 40% less dry matter compared to the feed. Keywords—Ultrafiltration, steepwater, starch industry, ceramic membrane.

[1]  T. M. Qaisrani FLUX ENHANCEMENT BY AIR DISPERSION IN CROSS-FLOW MICROFILTRATION OF A COLLOIDAL SYSTEM THROUGH SPIRAL WOUND MODULE , 2008 .

[2]  J. Petrus,et al.  The optimisation of soybean oil degumming on a pilot plant scale using a ceramic membrane , 2008 .

[3]  Živorad R. Lazić Design of Experiments in Chemical Engineering: A Practical Guide , 2004 .

[4]  H. Yeh Membrane ultrafiltration in a tubular module with a steel rod inserted concentrically for improved performance , 2000 .

[5]  Grazyna Zakrzewska-Trznadel,et al.  Response surface modeling and optimization of copper removal from aqua solutions using polymer assisted ultrafiltration , 2007 .

[6]  K. Rausch Front End to Backpipe: Membrane Technology in the Starch Processing Industry , 2002 .

[7]  B. Dalmacija,et al.  Reduction of solid content in starch industry wastewater by microfiltration , 2011 .

[8]  Shuili Yu,et al.  Flux enhancement during ultrafiltration of produced water using turbulence promoter. , 2006, Journal of environmental sciences.

[9]  Mark M. Clark,et al.  Modeling of flux decline during crossflow ultrafiltration of colloidal suspensions , 1998 .

[10]  Robert W. Field,et al.  A helical baffle for cross-flow microfiltration , 1995 .

[11]  K. Tung,et al.  Effect of particle size on the performance of cross-flow microfiltration , 2006 .

[12]  C. Cojocaru,et al.  Removal of cobalt ions from aqueous solutions by polymer assisted ultrafiltration using experimental design approach: part 2: Optimization of hydrodynamic conditions for a crossflow ultrafiltration module with rotating part. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[13]  R. Baker Membrane Technology and Applications , 1999 .

[14]  Beatriz Cancino-Madariaga,et al.  Combination treatment of corn starch wastewater by sedimentation, microfiltration and reverse osmosis , 2011 .

[15]  Mohamed Khayet,et al.  Response surface modelling and optimization in pervaporation , 2008 .

[16]  B. Buckland,et al.  Pilot-scale harvest of recombinant yeast employing microfiltration: a case study. , 1995, Journal of biotechnology.

[17]  A. Mendes,et al.  Study and optimization of aroma recovery from beer by pervaporation , 2009 .

[18]  M. Caric,et al.  Static turbulence promoter in cross-flow microfiltration of skim milk , 2004 .

[19]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[20]  G. Vladisavljević,et al.  Permeate flux and fouling resistance in ultrafiltration of depectinized apple juice using ceramic membranes , 2003 .