Structured Learning for Cell Tracking

We study the problem of learning to track a large quantity of homogeneous objects such as cell tracking in cell culture study and developmental biology. Reliable cell tracking in time-lapse microscopic image sequences is important for modern biomedical research. Existing cell tracking methods are usually kept simple and use only a small number of features to allow for manual parameter tweaking or grid search. We propose a structured learning approach that allows to learn optimum parameters automatically from a training set. This allows for the use of a richer set of features which in turn affords improved tracking compared to recently reported methods on two public benchmark sequences.

[1]  Horst Bischof,et al.  On-line Boosting and Vision , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[2]  Yoram Singer,et al.  An Efficient Boosting Algorithm for Combining Preferences by , 2013 .

[3]  Wen Gao,et al.  Visual tracking via weakly supervised learning from multiple imperfect oracles , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[4]  Wiro J. Niessen,et al.  Advanced Level-Set-Based Cell Tracking in Time-Lapse Fluorescence Microscopy , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  Multiple Nuclei Tracking Using Integer Programming for Quantitative Cancer Cell Cycle Analysis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Bundle Methods for Regularized Risk Minimization , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[7]  Yoav Freund,et al.  An Adaptive Version of the Boost by Majority Algorithm , 1999, COLT.

[8]  Ramakant Nevatia,et al.  Learning affinities and dependencies for multi-target tracking using a CRF model , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[9]  Ramakant Nevatia,et al.  Multi-target tracking by on-line learned discriminative appearance models , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Rich Caruana,et al.  An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms , 2006, ICML.

[11]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Cell population tracking and lineage construction with spatiotemporal context , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  Large Margin Methods for Structured and Interdependent Output Variables , 2005, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  I. Smal,et al.  Tracking in cell and developmental biology. , 2009, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[14]  Ben Taskar,et al.  Structured Prediction, Dual Extragradient and Bregman Projections , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[15]  Jens Rittscher,et al.  Coupled minimum-cost flow cell tracking for high-throughput quantitative analysis , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  Gang Hua,et al.  Discriminative Tracking by Metric Learning , 2010, ECCV.

[17]  Bernd Fischer,et al.  CellCognition: time-resolved phenotype annotation in high-throughput live cell imaging , 2010, Nature Methods.

[18]  Ram Nevatia,et al.  Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene , 2009, CVPR.

[19]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Robust tracking-by-detection using a detector confidence particle filter , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[20]  Ullrich Köthe,et al.  Deltr: Digital embryo lineage tree reconstructor , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[21]  Nikos Karampatziakis Static Analysis of Binary Executables Using Structural SVMs , 2010, NIPS.

[22]  Shai Avidan,et al.  Ensemble Tracking , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[23]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[24]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Cell image analysis: Algorithms, system and applications , 2011, 2011 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).

[25]  Gökhan BakIr,et al.  Predicting Structured Data , 2008 .

[26]  Tianli Yu,et al.  Kernelized structural SVM learning for supervised object segmentation , 2011, CVPR 2011.