Automatic analysis of altered gait in arylsulphatase A-deficient mice in the open field

In current research with laboratory animals, observing their dynamic behavior or locomotion is a laborintensive task. Automatic continuous monitoring can provide quantitative data on each animal’s condition and coordination ability. The objective of the present work is to develop an automated mouse observation system integrated with a conventional open-field test for motor function evaluation. Data were acquired from 86 mice having a targeted disruption of the arylsulphatase A (ASA) gene and having lowered coordinated locomotion abilities as a symptom. The mice used were 36 heterozygotes (12 females) and 50 knockout mice (30 females) at the age of 6 months. The mice were placed one at a time into the test setup, which consisted of a Plexiglas cage (53× 34.5 × 26 cm) and two fluorescent bulbs for proper illumination. The transparent cage allowed images to be captured from underneath the cage, so image information could be obtained about the dynamic variation of the positions of the limbs of the mice for gait reconstruction. Every mouse was recorded for 10 min. Background subtraction and color filtering were used to measure and calculate image features, which are variables that contain crucial information, such as the mouse’s position, orientation, body outline, and poßible locations for the mouse’s paws. A set of heuristic rules was used to prune implausible paw features and label the remaining ones as front/hind and left/right. After we had pruned the implausible paw features, the paw features that were consistent over subsequent images were matched to footprints. Finally, from the measured footprint sequence, eight parameters were calculated in order to quantify the gait of the mouse. This automatic observation technique can be integrated with a regular open-field test, where the trajectory and motor function of a free-moving mouse are measured simultaneously.

[1]  H. Steinberg,et al.  Effects of a single experience on subsequent reactions to drugs. , 1963, British journal of pharmacology and chemotherapy.

[2]  R N Walsh,et al.  The Open-Field Test: a critical review. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  R. Butterworth,et al.  Measurement of Ataxia and Related Neurological Signs in the Laboratory Rat , 1979, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[4]  W. Freed,et al.  An index of the functional condition of rat sciatic nerve based on measurements made from walking tracks , 1982, Experimental Neurology.

[5]  Robert Ben Johnston,et al.  Improved imaging of rat hindfoot prints for walking track analysis , 1991, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  Joyce Evans,et al.  Gait-stance duration as a measure of injury and recovery in the rat sciatic nerve model , 1994, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  R. D'Hooge,et al.  Phenotype of arylsulfatase A-deficient mice: relationship to human metachromatic leukodystrophy. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Jacqueline N. Crawley,et al.  A Proposed Test Battery and Constellations of Specific Behavioral Paradigms to Investigate the Behavioral Phenotypes of Transgenic and Knockout Mice , 1997, Hormones and Behavior.

[9]  Albert Gramsbergen,et al.  Methods to evaluate functional nerve recovery in adult rats: walking track analysis, video analysis and the withdrawal reflex , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  K. A. Clarke,et al.  Development and consistency of gait in the mouse , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[11]  Hans-Peter Lipp,et al.  Extended analysis of path data from mutant mice using the public domain software Wintrack , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[12]  W B Veldhuis,et al.  Automated quantitative gait analysis during overground locomotion in the rat: its application to spinal cord contusion and transection injuries. , 2001, Journal of neurotrauma.

[13]  L P Noldus,et al.  EthoVision: A versatile video tracking system for automation of behavioral experiments , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[14]  C J Twining,et al.  Robust tracking and posture description for laboratory rodents using active shape models , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[15]  R. Gerlai Phenomics: fiction or the future? , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  J. Crawley Behavioral phenotyping of rodents. , 2003, Comparative medicine.

[17]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications , 2003 .

[18]  Douglas Wahlsten,et al.  In search of a better mouse test , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  Jean-Marie Aerts,et al.  Automated gait analysis in the open-field test for laboratory mice , 2009, Behavior research methods.