Green ear yield and grain yield of maize cultivars in competition with weeds.

The reduction in herbicide use is one of the greatest interests for modern agriculture and several alternatives are being investigated with this objective, including the adoption of cultivars that suppress weeds. The objective of this study was to verify if maize cultivars develop differently, in competition with weeds, to produce green ears and grain. Randomized complete block design was used, with split-plots and five replications. Cultivars DKB 390, DKB 466, DKB 350, AG 7000, AG 7575 and Master, were evaluated in the plots, without weeding and two weedings (at 22 and 41 days after sowing) in sub plots. Twenty-one species were identified in the experimental area, the most frequent being Gramineae (Poaceae), Euphorbiaceae, Leguminosae (Fabaceae) and Convolvulaceae species. There was no difference in the dry biomass above-ground part of the weeds in the plots of the evaluated cultivars. The cultivars behaved similarly in treatments with or without hoeing, except for plant height and ear height evaluations. Without hoeing, plant height increased in cultivar DKB 390, while plant height and ear height decreased in cultivar AG 7575. In the other cultivars, these traits did not change under weed control. The presence of weeds decreased the values of all traits employed to assess green corn yield, with the exception of the total number of green ears and grain yield.

[1]  P. S. L. E. Silva,et al.  Effects of weed control through cowpea intercropping on mayze morphology and yield , 2007 .

[2]  P. S. L. E. Silva,et al.  Green ear yield and grain yield of maize after harvest of the first ear as baby corn , 2006 .

[3]  P. S. L. E. Silva,et al.  Weed control and green ear yield in maize , 2004 .

[4]  Peter J. Gregory,et al.  GROWTH AND BIOMASS PARTITIONING OF MAIZE DURING VEGETATIVE GROWTH IN RESPONSE TO STRIGA HERMONTHICA INFECTION AND NITROGEN SUPPLY , 2002, Experimental Agriculture.

[5]  K. Gross,et al.  Weed aboveground and seedbank community responses to agricultural management systems , 2001 .

[6]  D. W. Stewart,et al.  Morphology and yield response to weed pressure by corn hybrids differing in canopy architecture , 2001 .

[7]  Clarence J. Swanton,et al.  Understanding maize–weed competition: resource competition, light quality and the whole plant , 2001 .

[8]  J. D. Nalewaja,et al.  Cultural Practices for Weed Resistance Management , 1999, Weed Technology.

[9]  D. D. Buhler.  Weed population responses to weed control practices. I. Seed bank, weed populations, and crop yields , 1999, Weed Science.

[10]  Gilles D. Leroux,et al.  Prediction of corn (Zea mays) yield loss from early observations of the relative leaf area and the relative leaf cover of weeds , 1999, Weed Science.

[11]  D. Mortensen,et al.  Tolerance and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) suppressive ability of two old and two modern corn (Zea mays) hybrids , 1998, Weed Science.

[12]  D. Cloutier,et al.  Intercropping corn with soybean, lupin and forages: weed control by intercrops combined with interrow cultivation , 1998 .

[13]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Grain Yield is Reduced More by Weed Interference in an Old than in a New Maize Hybrid , 1997 .

[14]  C. G. P. Carvalho,et al.  Uma proposta de classificação dos coeficientes de variação para a cultura do milho , 1995 .

[15]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Effect of Weed Interference and Soil Nitrogen on Four Maize Hybrids , 1994 .

[16]  J. M. Pleasant,et al.  Competitive Abilities of Six Corn (Zea mays L.) Hybrids with Four Weed Control Practices , 1994, Weed Technology.

[17]  M. Callaway.  A compendium of crop varietal tolerance to weeds , 1992 .

[18]  Robert J. Jones,et al.  Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) Interference on Corn (Zea mays) , 1984, Weed Science.

[19]  P. Thomas,et al.  Competition between maize and Rottboellia exaltata , 1975, The Journal of Agricultural Science.