Rejoinder - Causes and Implications of Some Bidders Not Conforming to the Sealed-Bid Abstraction
暂无分享,去创建一个
This paper presents the authors' rejoinder to Zeithammer and Adams [Zeithammer, R., C. Adams. 2010. The sealed-bid abstraction in online auctions. Marketing Sci. 29(6) 964-987]. This rejoinder clarifies and qualifies conclusions of the original paper and makes suggestions for fruitful areas of future research. In particular, the original paper shows that bidding style can make a big difference in managerial decisions, but a structural model would be necessary to make confident predictions under different reserve prices. The rejoinder also clarifies the interpretation of feedback as a measure of bidder experience, and the relationship between bidder experience and bidding style.
[1] Ali Hortaçsu,et al. Commentary - Do Bids Equal Values on eBay? , 2010, Mark. Sci..
[2] Xin Wang,et al. Commentary - Bidders' Experience and Learning in Online Auctions: Issues and Implications , 2010, Mark. Sci..
[3] Christopher Adams,et al. The Sealed-Bid Abstraction in Online Auctions , 2009, Mark. Sci..
[4] Ye Hu,et al. The effect of experience on Internet auction bidding dynamics , 2009 .