Impact of PCSK9 inhibitors on the quality of life of patients at high cardiovascular risk

Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a critical intervention to contrast cardiovascular risk. In both primary and secondary prevention, the reduction of LDL-C levels with statin and non-statin agents correlates linearly with a decreased risk of cardiovascular events. Recent European Guidelines recommend an LDL-C goal of <100mg/dL or <70mg/dL in patients at high or very high cardiovascular risk, respectively. Combining PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9is) with statins and/or ezetimibe provides a relevant prognostic benefit in high-risk patients, especially in those not reaching recommended targets despite maximally tolerated statin dose. Over the last years, data regarding health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and qualityadjusted life years has been increasingly taken into consideration to support medical decisions in clinical practice. For this purpose, the European Quality of Life (EuroQol) Group, a research network dedicated to the study of health status, developed the EQ-5D questionnaire. This questionnaire has been validated in different populations, languages and clinical settings, enabling a standard comparison of HRQOL. While traditional lipid-lowering medications showed a positive impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL), a more invasive lipid-lowering regimen (i.e. lipoprotein apheresis), can adversely affect perceived QoL. To date, no studies have investigated QoL according to the EQ-5D in patients treated with PCSK9i. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of PCSK9i on the QoL of patients at high or very high cardiovascular risk. In this prospective single-centre study, we evaluated patients at high or very high cardiovascular risk admitted to our Academic Cardiology Centre. Patients were categorized as high or very high cardiovascular risk in accordance with the definition proposed by the 2016 European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice and the European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) system. Patients who did not reach recommended LDL-C goals despite maximal tolerated lipid-lowering therapy with statins and ezetimibe were treated additionally with evolocumab 140mg or alirocumab 75mg bi-weekly, according to national regulations. We measured the health status perceived by patients through the self-administered EuroQoL (or EQ-5D-3L) in the Italian language at enrolment (shortly prior to starting PCSK9 inhibitors therapy) and at oneyear follow-up. The EuroQol consists of two sections. The first part consists of five items exploring the current state of health of the respondent with different levels of severity. The five items comprise five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/ depression) and each domain consists of five severity levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems). An algorithm for an Italian population allows the calculation of a final EQ-5D score based on the assignment of weights for each answer. The second part consists of a 100-point score numeric visual analogue scale (VAS) for perceived health status. All participants provided written informed consent. All statistical analyses (Wilcoxon test for non-continuous variables and t-test for continuous variables) were performed using SPSS 25.0 (Chicago, USA).

[1]  M. Senni,et al.  Clinical Outcomes, Pharmacologic Treatment and Quality of Life of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Diseases Managed by Cardiologists: 1-Year Results of the START Study. , 2019, European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes.

[2]  G. Limongelli,et al.  Adherence to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors in high cardiovascular risk patients: an Italian single-center experience , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[3]  I. Pećin,et al.  Prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia: The role of PCSK9 inhibitors , 2017, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[4]  F. Schiele,et al.  Coronary artery disease: Risk stratification and patient selection for more aggressive secondary prevention , 2017, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[5]  A. Hoes,et al.  2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias: The Task Force for the Management of Dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Assocciation for Cardiovascular Prevention , 2016, Atherosclerosis.

[6]  Ian Graham,et al.  EUROPEAN GUIDELINES ON CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE , 2005 .

[7]  J. De Sutter,et al.  2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice , 2012, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[8]  A. Bittner,et al.  Mental symptoms and quality of life in lipoprotein apheresis patients in comparison to hemodialysis patients, platelet donors and normal population. , 2015, Atherosclerosis. Supplements.

[9]  Giancarlo Cesana,et al.  Italian population-based values of EQ-5D health states. , 2013, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[10]  T. Kohlmann,et al.  Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[11]  M. Taskinen,et al.  [ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias]. , 2011, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[12]  R. Collins,et al.  Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials , 2010, The Lancet.

[13]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  JOINT ESC GUIDELINES 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice – Web Addenda , 2016 .