The diffusion of renewable electricity in the presence of climate policy and technology learning: The case of Sweden

The overall objective of this paper is to analyze the impact of climate policy and technology learning on future investments in the Swedish power sector. Methodologically we assess the lifetime engineering costs of different power generation technologies in Sweden, and analyze the impact of carbon pricing on the competitive cost position of these technologies under varying rate-of-return requirements. We also argue that technological learning in the Swedish power sector - not the least in the case of wind power - is strongly related to the presence of international learning and R&D spillovers, and for this reason capacity expansions abroad have important influences of the future cost of power generation in Sweden. The results suggest that renewable power will benefit from existing EU climate policy measures, but overall additional policy instruments (e.g., green certificate schemes) are also needed to stimulate the diffusion of renewable power. Moreover, under a recent European Commission scenario and using estimated learning rates for wind power and the combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT), wind power gains considerable competitive ground due to international technology learning impacts. These latter results are, however, very sensitive to the assumed learning-by-doing rates for wind power and CCGT, respectively.

[1]  Katrin Uba,et al.  Who formulates renewable-energy policy? A Swedish example , 2010 .

[2]  Thomas Unger,et al.  Common Energy and Climate Strategies for the Nordic Countries - A Model Analysis , 2003 .

[3]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Global experience curves for wind farms , 2005 .

[4]  Leonardo Barreto,et al.  Emission trading and the role of learning-by-doing spillovers in the "bottom-up" energy-system ERIS model , 2004 .

[5]  Hannele Holttinen,et al.  The effect of wind power on CO2 abatement in the Nordic Countries , 2004 .

[6]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning rates for energy technologies , 2001 .

[7]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[8]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  Carbon abatement and new investment in liberalised electricity markets: a nuclear revival in the UK? , 2000 .

[9]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Wind Power in Europe: A Simultaneous Innovation–Diffusion Model , 2007 .

[10]  Tobias N. Rasmussen CO2 abatement policy with learning-by-doing in renewable energy , 2001 .

[11]  Fredrik Pettersson,et al.  Power Generation Technology Choice in the Presence of Climate Policy , 2005 .

[12]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  International R&D spillovers , 1995 .

[13]  Gijsbert Zwart,et al.  An efficient, sustainable and secure supply of energy for Europe , 2007 .

[14]  C. Wene Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[15]  Joel Darmstadter,et al.  Winner, Loser, or Innocent Victim? Has Renewable Energy Performed As Expected? , 2000 .

[16]  Kristina Ek,et al.  The economics of renewable energy support , 2005 .

[17]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  A utility-eye view of the CO2 compliance-decision process in the European power-sector , 2003 .

[18]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[19]  Ulrika Claeson Colpier,et al.  The economics of the combined cycle gas turbine - an experience curve analysis , 2002 .

[20]  A. Riess,et al.  Environmental and technology externalities: policy and investment implications , 2007 .

[21]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[22]  Antonio Soria,et al.  Modelling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptive expectations models with learning by doing and learning by searching , 2000 .

[23]  G. Bemis,et al.  LEVELIZED COST OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES , 1990 .

[24]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Empirical challenges in the use of learning curves for assessing the economic prospects of renewable energy technologies , 2007 .

[25]  Steen Marc pierr e gregoire Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Fossil Fuel Fired Power Generation Systems. , 2001 .

[26]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[27]  Erik O. Ahlgren,et al.  Impacts of a common green certificate market on electricity and CO2-emission markets in the Nordic countries , 2005 .

[28]  G. R. Corey,et al.  Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy , 1982 .

[29]  Patrik Söderholm Fuel for thought: European energy market restructuring and the future of power generation gas use , 2001 .

[30]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Offshore wind power policy and planning in Sweden , 2011 .

[31]  Asami Miketa,et al.  The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom , 2005 .