Futuristic Trends in Networks and Computing Technologies: Second International Conference, FTNCT 2019, Chandigarh, India, November 22–23, 2019, Revised Selected Papers

LEACH model was proposed 19 years back and research community from the field of WSN has been exploring LEACH variants. To discover unseen areas in the field of WSN it is a great idea to study approved variants of LEACH through the time. Present paper studies the popular and approved versions of LEACH. The study categorizes all the variants in single and multi-hop communication mode, depends upon packets transmitted from the CH and the BS. The paper makes a comparative analysis based on parameters like cluster formation, complexity, energy efficiency, overhead, and scalability. Advantages and disadvantages of all the variants are discussed. Finally, the paper suggests upcoming research in the field of WSN.

[1]  M WeissGary.  Mining with rarity , 2004 .

[2]  Yue Zhang,et al.  A Bilingual Attention Network for Code-switched Emotion Prediction , 2016, COLING.

[3]  Nathalie Japkowicz,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Changing Environments on Classifier Performance , 2008, Canadian Conference on AI.

[4]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  An insight into classification with imbalanced data: Empirical results and current trends on using data intrinsic characteristics , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[5]  Vijayasaradhi Indurthi,et al.  EMOMINER at SemEval-2019 Task 3: A Stacked BiLSTM Architecture for Contextual Emotion Detection in Text , 2019, SemEval@NAACL-HLT.

[6]  Kedhar Nath Narahari,et al.  SemEval-2019 Task 3: EmoContext Contextual Emotion Detection in Text , 2019, *SEMEVAL.

[7]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Small sample size effects in statistical pattern recognition: recommendations for practitioners and open problems , 1990, [1990] Proceedings. 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Ester Bernadó-Mansilla,et al.  Evolutionary rule-based systems for imbalanced data sets , 2008, Soft Comput..

[9]  Jianfei Yu,et al.  Improving Multi-label Emotion Classification via Sentiment Classification with Dual Attention Transfer Network , 2018, EMNLP.

[10]  Yutao Ma,et al.  Towards Cross-Project Defect Prediction with Imbalanced Feature Sets , 2014, ArXiv.

[11]  Harsh Patel.  E-LSTM at SemEval-2019 Task 3: Semantic and Sentimental Features Retention for Emotion Detection in Text , 2019, SemEval@NAACL-HLT.

[12]  Sergey Smetanin.  EmoSense at SemEval-2019 Task 3: Bidirectional LSTM Network for Contextual Emotion Detection in Textual Conversations , 2019, SemEval@NAACL-HLT.

[13]  Koichiro Ochimizu,et al.  Towards logistic regression models for predicting fault-prone code across software projects , 2009, 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement.

[14]  Ho-Jin Choi,et al.  Word-Level Emotion Embedding Based on Semi-Supervised Learning for Emotional Classification in Dialogue , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp).

[15]  Joseph Cummings,et al.  CLARK at SemEval-2019 Task 3: Exploring the Role of Context to Identify Emotion in a Short Conversation , 2019, *SEMEVAL.

[16]  Shujuan Jiang,et al.  Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptation for Heterogeneous Defect Prediction , 2019, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[17]  José-Ángel González,et al.  ELiRF-UPV at SemEval-2019 Task 3: Snapshot Ensemble of Hierarchical Convolutional Neural Networks for Contextual Emotion Detection , 2019, *SEMEVAL.

[18]  Harald C. Gall,et al.  Cross-project defect prediction: a large scale experiment on data vs. domain vs. process , 2009, ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE.

[19]  Vahida Attar,et al.  Classification of data streams with skewed distribution , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems.

[20]  Shrikanth Narayanan,et al.  NTUA-SLP at SemEval-2018 Task 1: Predicting Affective Content in Tweets with Deep Attentive RNNs and Transfer Learning , 2018, *SEMEVAL.

[21]  Michal Perelkiewicz.  CX-ST-RNM at SemEval-2019 Task 3: Fusion of Recurrent Neural Networks Based on Contextualized and Static Word Representations for Contextual Emotion Detection , 2019, SemEval@NAACL-HLT.

[22]  F. Massey.  The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit , 1951 .

[23]  H. Shimodaira,et al.  Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function , 2000 .

[24]  Stan Matwin,et al.  DeepMiner at SemEval-2018 Task 1: Emotion Intensity Recognition Using Deep Representation Learning , 2018, SemEval@NAACL-HLT.

[25]  Audris Mockus,et al.  Towards building a universal defect prediction model , 2014, MSR 2014.

[26]  Gerardo Canfora,et al.  Multi-objective Cross-Project Defect Prediction , 2013, 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation.

[27]  C. Spearman.  The proof and measurement of association between two things. , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[28]  Lionel C. Briand,et al.  Assessing the Applicability of Fault-Proneness Models Across Object-Oriented Software Projects , 2002, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[29]  Cornelia Caragea,et al.  Fine-Grained Emotion Detection in Health-Related Online Posts , 2018, EMNLP.

[30]  Yassine Benajiba,et al.  SymantoResearch at SemEval-2019 Task 3: Combined Neural Models for Emotion Classification in Human-Chatbot Conversations , 2019, SemEval@NAACL-HLT.

[31]  Yun Xing,et al.  CLP at SemEval-2019 Task 3: Multi-Encoder in Hierarchical Attention Networks for Contextual Emotion Detection , 2019, SemEval@NAACL-HLT.

[32]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Data Intrinsic Characteristics , 2018 .

[33]  YiJiang Zhang,et al.  A novel imbalanced data classification algorithm based on fuzzy rule , 2019 .

[34]  Ahmed E. Hassan,et al.  Think locally, act globally: Improving defect and effort prediction models , 2012, 2012 9th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR).

[35]  José Salvador Sánchez,et al.  On the k-NN performance in a challenging scenario of imbalance and overlapping , 2008, Pattern Analysis and Applications.

[36]  Emilia Mendes,et al.  A Systematic Study of Cross-Project Defect Prediction With Meta-Learning , 2018, ArXiv.

[37]  Premkumar T. Devanbu,et al.  Recalling the "imprecision" of cross-project defect prediction , 2012, SIGSOFT FSE.

[38]  Hessam Amini,et al.  CLaC Lab at SemEval-2019 Task 3: Contextual Emotion Detection Using a Combination of Neural Networks and SVM , 2019, SemEval@NAACL-HLT.

[39]  Xiaoyan Zhu,et al.  Emotional Chatting Machine: Emotional Conversation Generation with Internal and External Memory , 2017, AAAI.

[40]  Baowen Xu,et al.  Heterogeneous cross-company defect prediction by unified metric representation and CCA-based transfer learning , 2015, ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE.

[41]  Neil D. Lawrence,et al.  Dataset Shift in Machine Learning , 2009 .

[42]  Tao Zhang,et al.  HDA: Cross-Project Defect Prediction via Heterogeneous Domain Adaptation With Dictionary Learning , 2018, IEEE Access.

[43]  Akansha Jain,et al.  ParallelDots at SemEval-2019 Task 3: Domain Adaptation with feature embeddings for Contextual Emotion Analysis , 2019, SemEval@NAACL-HLT.

[44]  Szymon Wilk,et al.  Learning from Imbalanced Data in Presence of Noisy and Borderline Examples , 2010, RSCTC.

[45]  Vachagan Gratian.  BrainEE at SemEval-2019 Task 3: Ensembling Linear Classifiers for Emotion Prediction , 2019, SemEval@NAACL-HLT.

[46]  Osmar R. Zaïane,et al.  ANA at SemEval-2019 Task 3: Contextual Emotion detection in Conversations through hierarchical LSTMs and BERT , 2019, *SEMEVAL.

[47]  Muhammad Abdul-Mageed,et al.  UBC-NLP at IEST 2018: Learning Implicit Emotion With an Ensemble of Language Models , 2018, WASSA@EMNLP.

[48]  Rafal Poswiata.  ConSSED at SemEval-2019 Task 3: Configurable Semantic and Sentiment Emotion Detector , 2019, SemEval@NAACL-HLT.

[49]  Joan Xiao.  Figure Eight at SemEval-2019 Task 3: Ensemble of Transfer Learning Methods for Contextual Emotion Detection , 2019, SemEval@NAACL-HLT.

[50]  Ayse Basar Bener,et al.  On the relative value of cross-company and within-company data for defect prediction , 2009, Empirical Software Engineering.

[51]  Yong Li,et al.  Evaluating Data Filter on Cross-Project Defect Prediction: Comparison and Improvements , 2017, IEEE Access.