A Comprehensive Analysis of E-government services adoption in Saudi Arabia: Obstacles and Challenges

Often referred as Government to Citizen (G2C) e- government services, many governments around the world are developing and utilizing ICT technologies to provide information and services to their citizens. In Saudi Arabia (KSA) e- government projects have been identified as one of the top government priority areas. However, the adoption of e- government is facing many challenges and barriers including technological, cultural, organizational which must be considered and treated carefully. This paper explores the key factors of user adoption of e-government services through empirical evidence gathered by survey of 460 Saudi citizens including IT department employees from different public sectors. Based on the analysis of data collected the researchers were able to identify some of the important barriers and challenges from these different perspectives. As a result, this study has generated a list of possible recommendations for the public sector and policy- makers to move towards successful adoption of e-government services in Saudi Arabia.

[1]  Feng Li,et al.  Implementing E-Government Strategy in Scotland: Current Situation and Emerging Issues , 2003, J. Electron. Commer. Organ..

[2]  Valentina Ndou,et al.  E – Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges , 2004, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[3]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2000 .

[4]  K. Sandhu,et al.  Factors Influencing the Adoption and Usage of Online Services in Saudi Arabia , 2010, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[5]  Neeraj Pandey,et al.  Strategic Marketing of E-Government for Technology Adoption Facilitation , 2008 .

[6]  Saudi Arabia,et al.  An exploratory study of factors determining e-government success in Saudi Arabia , 2008 .

[7]  Steve Drew,et al.  Challenges of e-Government Services Adoption in Saudi Arabia from an e-Ready Citizen Perspective , 2010 .

[8]  M. J. Moon The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[9]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Barriers to Distance Education and Training: Survey Results. , 2002 .

[10]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Review of: Berg, Bruce L. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 6th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2007 , 2008, Inf. Res..

[12]  Mari Stein,et al.  Help!: The Art of Computer Technical Support , 1991 .

[13]  Abdulrahman Saleh Al-zumaia Attitudes and perceptions regarding Internet-based electronic data interchange in a public organization in Saudi Arabia , 2001 .

[14]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Abdullah Mohammed Al-shehry,et al.  Transformation towards e-government in The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia : technological and organisational perspectives , 2009 .

[16]  Peter Williams,et al.  The Learning Web , 2002 .

[17]  Donald W. Hofmann,et al.  Internet-Based Distance Learning in Higher Education , 2002 .

[18]  M. Kamal,et al.  An exploratory study on the role of intermediaries in delivering public services in Madinah City: Case of Saudi Arabia , 2010 .

[19]  Hana Al-Nuaim,et al.  An Evaluation Framework for Saudi E-Government , 2011 .

[20]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[21]  Danish Dada The Failure of E‐Government in Developing Countries: A Literature Review , 2006, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[22]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  E-government around the world: lessons, challenges, and future directions , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..