The response of fawn survival to changes in habitat quality varies according to cohort quality and spatial scale

Summary 1. Temporal and spatial variation can strongly affect life-history traits, but few studies to date have quantified the importance of the interplay between temporal and spatial components of population dynamics. 2. We analysed spatiotemporal variation in early survival of roe deer fawns over 15 years (1985‐99) in an intensively monitored population in western France at two spatial scales: the maternal home range (a few tens of hectares) and the forest stand (a few hundreds of hectares). 3. Spatial variation in resource availability interacted with temporal variation to shape fawn survival. In good years, survival was not influenced by habitat quality (being 0·68 in the rich oak stand with hornbeam coppices vs. 0·64 in the poorer part of the reserve). At the home range scale, early survival of fawns during good years decreased with increasing occurrence of preferred plant species in the rich habitat; there was no effect in the poor habitat. 4. During bad years, however, there was a positive relationship between the occurrence of preferred plant species and survival of fawns in the poor habitat, whereas no relationship occurred in the rich habitat. Spatial variation in early survival during bad years was significant at the plot scale (from 0·19 to 0·40 in the poor habitat and from 0·49 to 0·61 in the rich habitat) even after accounting for the forest stand variations (from 0·27 to 0·51). The occurrence of key plant species therefore limits female reproductive success only in the poor habitat under harsh conditions. 5. Our findings highlight the crucial role of spatiotemporal interactions in shaping individual fitness in mammalian populations, and underline the importance of the scale of analysis when characterizing ecological processes.

[1]  S. Juliano,et al.  POPULATION DYNAMICS , 2007, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[2]  Erlend B. Nilsen,et al.  Individual access to preferred habitat affects fitness components in female roe deer Capreolus capreolus , 2004 .

[3]  J. Gaillard,et al.  TEMPORAL VARIATION IN SURVIVAL OF MAMMALS: A CASE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CANALIZATION? , 2003 .

[4]  Nathalie Pettorelli,et al.  AGE AND DENSITY MODIFY THE EFFECTS OF HABITAT QUALITY ON SURVIVAL AND MOVEMENTS OF ROE DEER , 2003 .

[5]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Effects of hurricane lothar on the population dynamics of european roe deer , 2003 .

[6]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Spatial variation in springtime food resources influences the winter body mass of roe deer fawns , 2003 .

[7]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Spatio–temporal dynamics of the grey–sided vole in Hokkaido: identifying coupling using state-based Markov–chain modelling , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Cohort effects and deer population dynamics , 2003 .

[9]  C. Dormann Consequences of manipulations in carbon and nitrogen supply for concentration of anti-herbivore defence compounds in Salix polaris , 2003 .

[10]  Nathalie Pettorelli,et al.  Matching data sets from two different spatial samples , 2002 .

[11]  L. Eberhardt A PARADIGM FOR POPULATION ANALYSIS OF LONG‐LIVED VERTEBRATES , 2002 .

[12]  Margaret T May,et al.  Regression Modelling Strategies with Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. Frank E Harrell Jr, New York: Springer 2001, pp. 568, $79.95. ISBN 0-387-95232-2. , 2002 .

[13]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Variations in adult body mass in roe deer: the effects of population density at birth and of habitat quality , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Nathalie Pettorelli Variabilité individuelle et dynamique de population : importance de la composante spatiale , 2002 .

[15]  S. Focardi,et al.  Spatial patterns and density dependence in the dynamics of a roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population in central Italy , 2002, Oecologia.

[16]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Plant phenology, migration and geographical variation in body weight of a large herbivore: the effect of a variable topography , 2001 .

[17]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Population density and small-scale variation in habitat quality affect phenotypic quality in roe deer , 2001, Oecologia.

[18]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2001 .

[19]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Relationships between sex ratio, climate and density in red deer: the importance of spatial scale , 2000 .

[20]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Temporal Variation in Fitness Components and Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores , 2000 .

[21]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Factors affecting maternal care in an income breeder, the European roe deer , 2000 .

[22]  T. O’Connor,et al.  Resource heterogeneity and ungulate population dynamics , 2000 .

[23]  R. Andersen,et al.  The European roe deer: the biology of success. , 2000 .

[24]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  On harvesting a structured ungulate population , 2000 .

[25]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach , 2001 .

[26]  R. Nisbet,et al.  POPULATION DYNAMICS AND SPATIAL SCALE: EFFECTS OF SYSTEM SIZE ON POPULATION PERSISTENCE , 1999 .

[27]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  The relationship between habitat choice and lifetime reproductive success in female red deer , 1999, Oecologia.

[28]  Tim Coulson,et al.  Small‐scale spatial dynamics in a fluctuating ungulate population , 1999 .

[29]  C. Thomas,et al.  The spatial structure of populations , 1999 .

[30]  O. Hjeljord,et al.  Range-body mass interactions of a northern ungulate – a test of hypothesis , 1999, Oecologia.

[31]  John D. C. Linnell,et al.  Family effects on growth and survival of juvenile roe deer , 1998 .

[32]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Early survival in roe deer: causes and consequences of cohort variation in two contrasted populations , 1997, Oecologia.

[34]  D. Hosmer,et al.  A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  Tim Coulson,et al.  POPULATION SUBSTRUCTURE, LOCAL DENSITY, AND CALF WINTER SURVIVAL IN RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) , 1997 .

[36]  K. I. Jönsson,et al.  Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction , 1997 .

[37]  John D. C. Linnell,et al.  Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid : the roe deer , 1996 .

[38]  A. Hastings,et al.  Density dependence : are we searching at the wrong spatial scale ? , 1996 .

[39]  John D. C. Linnell,et al.  Who killed Bambi? The role of predation in the neonatal mortality of temperate ungulates , 1995, Wildlife Biology.

[40]  O. Liberg,et al.  Patterns of dispersal and seasonal migration in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) , 1995 .

[41]  Daniel Chessel,et al.  L'analyse des correspondances décentrée : application aux peuplements ichtyologiques du Haut-Rhône , 1995 .

[42]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Roe deer survival patterns: a comparative analysis of contrasting populations , 1993 .

[43]  B. Sæther,et al.  Ecological correlates of individual variation in age at maturity in female moose (Alces alces): the effects of environmental variability , 1993 .

[44]  W. S. Fairbanks Birthdate, Birthweight, and Survival in Pronghorn Fawns , 1993 .

[45]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[46]  R. Harris,et al.  Productivity and early calf survival in the porcupine caribou herd , 1992 .

[47]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination , 1991 .

[48]  C. Maizeret,et al.  Influence de la composition chimique des végétaux sur les choix alimentaires des chevreuils , 1991, Revue d'Écologie (La Terre et La Vie).

[49]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1994 .

[50]  J. Rameau,et al.  Flore forestière française, Plaines et collines , 1989 .

[51]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[52]  J. Jullien,et al.  Intérêt de l'étude de la période juvénile pour le suivi de l'évolution d'une population de chevreuils (Capreolus capreolus) , 1988 .

[53]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Early development and population dynamics in red deer. II: Density-independent effects and cohort variation , 1987 .

[54]  C. Maizeret,et al.  Etude du régime alimentaire et recherche du déterminisme fonctionnel de la sélectivité chez le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) des Landes de Gascogne , 1984 .

[55]  G. Högstedt Evolution of clutch size in birds: adaptive variation in relation to territory quality. , 1980, Science.

[56]  A. Łomnicki,et al.  Regulation of population density due to individual differences and patchy environment , 1980 .