Conditions favouring the introduction of positive switching costs for adopters of abstract compatibility standards

Research shows vendors manipulate open standards to introduce positive switching costs for product users. This article explores the possibility of manipulating abstract vertical compatibility standards based on the eXtensible Markup Language (XML) to create switching costs for adopters. Vertical standards formalise business processes and data formats unique to specific industries. Manipulating vertical standards does not optimise or enhance proprietary hardware capabilities since vertical standards are not embedded in physical products, and any manipulation is easily detected and quite correctable, so it is unclear whether positive switching costs can be introduced by any supplier. This paper describes why vertical standards are not immune to manipulation, and explores some conditions which may make the manipulation of purely abstract compatibility standards possible. A series of testable propositions are presented, and evidence that shows asymmetries exist to permit the introduction of positive switching costs is discussed. Further research in this area is discussed.

[1]  Stanley M. Besen.  AM versus FM: The Battle of the Bands , 1992 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[3]  Robin L. Wakefield,et al.  Measuring switching costs in IT outsourcing services , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Vertical E-Business Standards and Standards Developing Organizations: A Conceptual Framework , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[5]  P. Klemperer,et al.  Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects , 2006 .

[6]  Juha-Miikka Nurmilaakso,et al.  EDI-based and XML-based business-to-business integration: a statistical analysis , 2009, Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Arun Rai,et al.  Standardization in Vertical Industries: An Institutional Analysis of XML-Based Standards Infusion in Electricity Markets , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[8]  M. Delmas,et al.  The Diffusion of Voluntary International Management Standards: Responsible Care, ISO 9000, and ISO 14001 in the Chemical Industry , 2007 .

[9]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Total Quality Management in Information Systems Development: Key Constructs and Relationships , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  P. David,et al.  The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research 1 , 1990 .

[11]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Enhancing value via cooperation: firms' process benefits from participation in a standard consortium , 2012 .

[12]  Chris Forman,et al.  Can Vendors Influence Switching Costs and Compatibility in an Environment with Open Standards? , 2006, MIS Q..

[13]  Vittorio Chiesa,et al.  Standard-Setting Processes: Evidence from Two Case Studies , 2002 .

[14]  Jørn Braa,et al.  DEVELOPING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES THE FLEXIBLE STANDARDS STRATEGY , 2006 .

[15]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[16]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  ERP systems implementation success factors: IS and non-IS managers' perceptions , 2009, Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Organizational assimilation of complex technologies: an empirical study of component-based software development , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[18]  Judy K. Frels,et al.  Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences , 2003 .

[19]  Jungjoo Jahng,et al.  Adoption of XML Specifications: An Exploratory Study of Industry Practices , 2003, AMCIS.

[20]  Rebecca T. Mercuri.  Standards insecurity , 2003, CACM.

[21]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Industry-Wide Information Systems Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the U.S. Residential Mortgage Industry , 2006, MIS Q..

[22]  Rubén A. Mendoza,et al.  Switching Costs and Abstract Compatibility Standards: Are Vertical Standards as Vulnerable as Physical Products? , 2010, AMCIS.

[23]  Christine Legner,et al.  Leveraging Web Services for Implementing Vertical Industry Standards: A Model for Service-Based Interoperability , 2008, Electron. Mark..

[24]  Rubén A. Mendoza,et al.  Business Intelligence 2.0: The eXtensible Markup Language as Strategic Enabler , 2010, Int. J. Bus. Intell. Res..

[25]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[26]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  Success and failure in IT outsourcing by government agencies: two Australian case studies , 2008, Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst..

[27]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Dynamic Competition with Switching Costs , 1988 .