The Quality and Characteristics of Leading General Hospitals’ Websites in China

This paper focuses on the evaluation of quality of hospital websites in China. Leading general hospitals’ websites in China are increasingly used by the public, but research on the quality of these websites in China is few and far between. In this article, we conducted a cross-sectional descriptive infodemiology study to assess the quality and to describe the characteristics of these websites. Using a pre-defined objective criterion based on content, function, design, and management & usage, two well-trained reviewers independently reviewed and analyzed websites of 23 nationally prominent leading general hospitals of China from April to June 2009. Hospital election is on the basis of the best Chinese hospitals published by official and non-official sources combined with experts’ experiences and the research purpose. Results show that websites of most hospitals showed a good performance in website content, showed a normal performance in website function and design, but showed a bad performance in website management & usage. As the public increasingly looks to hospital websites for information and services, leading general hospitals in China need to keep up with increasingly high standards and demands of health-care consumers.

[1]  G. Duclos.  New York 1987 , 2000 .

[2]  J. Boscarino.  The public's perception of quality hospitals II: Implications for patient surveys. , 1992, Hospital & health services administration.

[3]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[4]  G D Lundberg,et al.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. , 1997, JAMA.

[5]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Consumer health informatics , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Tsuang Kuo,et al.  Measuring users' perceived portal service quality: An empirical study , 2005 .

[7]  Wang Dao-lin.  THE APPLICATION OF AHP AND FUZZY SYNTHETIC EVALUATION IN UNIVERSITY WEBSITES EVALUATION , 2005 .

[8]  M Pallen,et al.  Guide to the Internet: The world wide web , 1995, BMJ.

[9]  R. J. Cline,et al.  Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. , 2001, Health education research.

[10]  J J Mira,et al.  A Comparison of Websites from Spanish, American and British Hospitals , 2008, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[11]  J C Wyatt,et al.  Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the world wide web , 1997, BMJ.

[12]  T R Eng,et al.  Review of published criteria for evaluating health-related websites. , 1999, The Western journal of medicine.

[13]  T. Ferguson,et al.  Online patient-helpers and physicians working together: a new partnership for high quality health care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Data Triangulation in Action: Using Comment Analysis to Refine Web Quality Metrics , 2005, ECIS.

[15]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Assessing the quality of auction Web sites , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Jan Norum,et al.  Evaluation of Norwegian cancer hospitals' Web sites and explorative survey among cancer patients on their use of the Internet , 2001, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  Roberto J Rodrigues,et al.  Ethical and Legal Issues in Interactive Health Communications: A Call for International Cooperation , 2000, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  Ge Wei-qi.  A Study on the Readability of Accounting Narratives of Chinese Listed Companies , 2007 .

[19]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[20]  Kenneth G Adler,et al.  Web Portals in Primary Care: An Evaluation of Patient Readiness and Willingness to Pay for Online Services , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[21]  Laura O'Grady,et al.  Accessibility compliance rates of consumer-oriented Canadian health care Web sites , 2005, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[22]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  WebQual: An Exploration of Web-Site Quality , 2000, ECIS.

[23]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  E-health and assurance: curing hospital websites , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Heal..

[24]  Manish Latthe,et al.  Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  W M Tierney,et al.  Can raters consistently evaluate the content of focus groups? , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[26]  Beverley G. Hope,et al.  Perceived Service Quality in a University Web Portal: Revising the E-Qual Instrument , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[27]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  Internet Privacy Concerns and Social Awareness as Determinants of Intention to Transact , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[28]  Thomas S. Gruca,et al.  Hospital web sites: Promise and progress , 2004 .

[29]  M. Gardiner,et al.  Applying cognitive psychology to user-interface design , 1987 .

[30]  Michael D Cabana,et al.  Do the Leading Children's Hospitals have Quality Web Sites? A Description of Children's Hospital Web Sites , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[31]  Steve W. Chu.  Using Chopsticks and a Fork Together: Challenges and Strategies of Developing a Chinese/English Bilingual Web Site. , 1999 .

[32]  E Ernst,et al.  Assessing websites on complementary and alternative medicine for cancer. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[33]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A conceptual framework for understanding e-service quality : implications for future research and managerial practice , 2000 .

[34]  K. Dyer,et al.  Ethical Challenges of Medicine and Health on the Internet: A Review , 2001, Journal of medical Internet research.

[35]  Stuart J. Barnes,et al.  Information and interaction quality: evaluating Internet bookshop web sites with WebQual , 2000 .

[36]  Boscarino Ja.  The public's perception of quality hospitals II: Implications for patient surveys. , 1992 .

[37]  D Charnock,et al.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[38]  A R Jadad,et al.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? , 1998, JAMA.