The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem

Keeping track of employees’ time and attendance is difficult and time-consuming task for the companies. Today many companies are performing the digital time and attendance systems that automatically track and process the data to improve their operations and save money. There are many alternatives for the time and attendance systems in the market and appropriate selection among them is not easy in the presence of multiple, usually conflicting, criteria. So this selection may be considered as a Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) problem. In this paper, the new combined decision making approach based on Criteria Importance Through Inter criteria Correlation (CRITIC) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) methods is used for the time and attendance software selection problem of the private hospital. The weights of the criteria are determined by CRITIC method and the alternatives are ranked by WASPAS method for finding the most suitable alternative. The novelty of this paper to the literature is to combine CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the first time.

[1]  S Adewole Kayode,et al.  Fingerprint Biometric Authentication for Enhancing Staff Attendance System , 2013 .

[2]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Application of WASPAS Method as an Optimization Tool in Non-traditional Machining Processes , 2015, Inf. Technol. Control..

[3]  Fernando García,et al.  Spanish Savings Banks and their Future Transformation into Private Capital Banks.Determining their Value by a Multicriteria Valuation Methodology , 2011 .

[4]  Romualdas Bausys,et al.  Sustainable Assessment of Alternative Sites for the Construction of a Waste Incineration Plant by Applying WASPAS Method with Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set , 2015 .

[5]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment , 2012 .

[6]  Xianglian Zhao,et al.  Method and Application for Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation with Subjective and Objective Information , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  Nilgun B. Harmancioglu,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making for water resource management: a case study of the Gediz River Basin, Turkey , 2010 .

[8]  Kiyun Yu,et al.  AREAL FEATURE MATCHING BASED ON SIMILARITY USING CRITIC METHOD , 2015 .

[9]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Multi-criteria Assessment of Facades’ Alternatives: Peculiarities of Ranking Methodology☆ , 2013 .

[10]  Mohammad Alemi-Ardakani,et al.  Enhancing impact characterization and multi-criteria design optimization of glass fiber reinforced polypropylene laminates , 2014 .

[11]  M. Nalls,et al.  Genome-Wide Association Study of Retinopathy in Individuals without Diabetes , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[13]  Ayşegül Tuş,et al.  CODAS ve PSI Yöntemleri İle Personel Değerlendirmesi , 2018 .

[14]  Chun Lu,et al.  Application of Combination Weighting Method to Weight Calculation in Performance Evaluation of ICT , 2015, 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[15]  Jurgita Antuchevičienė,et al.  Using QSPM and WASPAS methods for determining outsourcing strategies , 2014 .

[16]  Esra Aytaç Adalı,et al.  Critic and Maut Methods for the Contract Manufacturer Selection Problem , 2017 .

[17]  Halim Kazan,et al.  Financial Performance Assessment of Large Scale Conglomerates Via Topsis and Critic Methods , 2014, International Journal of Management and Sustainability.

[18]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Decision making on business issues with foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Applications of WASPAS Method in Manufacturing Decision Making , 2014, Informatica.

[20]  G. Mavrotas,et al.  Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[21]  Süleyman Çakir,et al.  Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleriyle Lojistik Firmalarinda Performans Ölçümü Performance Measurement of Logistics Firms with Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods , 2013 .

[22]  Wang Yanfang,et al.  An Empirical Study of Evaluation Index System and Measure Method on City’s Soft Power: 17 Cities in Shandong Province , 2013 .